/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2013/03/08/#ubuntustudio-devel.txt

* smartboyhw is unhappy that he will be filing dozens of FFes....11:33
smartboyhwzequence, I thought Rick Spencer gave up getting 13.04 rolling11:41
smartboyhwPart of the straw man proposal was to convert 13.04 into a Rolling11:41
smartboyhwRelease in order to allow us to go faster on the converged OS starting11:41
smartboyhwimmediately. Given the work that is left to achieve a proper proposal11:41
smartboyhwfor the tech board, I don't foresee such a proposal being completed in11:41
smartboyhwtime to make such a radical change to 13.04.11:41
smartboyhwCheers, Rick11:41
smartboyhw................................11:41
zequencesmartboyhw: I'm not making any assumptions about that. 11:45
smartboyhwzequence, eh?11:45
zequencesmartboyhw: What do mean, filing FFes?11:46
smartboyhwzequence, anyway it turns out i only need one FFes:P11:46
smartboyhwzequence, BTW: now that you've managed to get everything working on wiki, I think for 13.10 we should start working on offline docs13:42
smartboyhwAnd hey scott-work 13:42
scott-workgood morning smartboyhw , everyone13:43
scott-worki like off-line docs13:43
smartboyhwscott-work, :)13:44
scott-worki have been thinking about that for a while now, not all docs mind you, just some important ones perhaps13:44
scott-workbut we'd need a new package, which isn't a big deal13:44
scott-workbut we could also include release notes in that package if we so chose13:44
smartboyhwscott-work, OK:)13:44
smartboyhwscott-work, zequence sent otu a call for artworks:)13:45
smartboyhwAnd here's our current status: http://status.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-raring/group/topic-raring-flavor-ubuntustudio.html13:45
scott-workhmmm, we are not bad off actually. much better than i expected13:46
smartboyhwscott-work, because we marked most of them as BLOCKED:P13:46
smartboyhwLOL13:47
scott-workoh, LOL13:47
smartboyhwscott-work, :P13:47
scott-workand a lot as postponed as well, i see13:47
smartboyhwscott-work, yes13:48
smartboyhws/BLOCKED/POSTPONED/ actually13:48
kubotusmartboyhw: You did something wrong... Try s/you/me/ or tell me "help sed"13:48
smartboyhwLOL13:48
zequencescott-work: What do you think of my attempt at some sort of unified theme for Ubuntu Studio? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/Artwork/CarbonTheme14:05
zequenceThe background is too dark. I'm going to fix that14:05
zequenceLearning as I do. Using inkscape a bit more now14:06
smartboyhwzequence, makes me think of the movie Troy....14:06
zequenceNot a bad thing, I suppose14:06
smartboyhwProbably at the same time change the plymouth theme too (possible?)14:06
* smartboyhw wonders how could zequence actually being able to do SO many things.14:06
zequenceThe plymoth theme is really nice. I wouldn't want to change anything but the wallpaper until we're really sure about it14:07
smartboyhwzequence, OK14:07
zequencewhile I'm doing this, I want to lay out a structure for how we work with artwor14:07
zequenceartwork*14:07
zequencefor each release, we'll see if we can do something new. and at least for LTS, we do a new makeover of everything14:08
smartboyhwzequence, nice one14:08
smartboyhwzequence, but will we have 13.10 ?14:08
zequenceDoesn't need to be a total rework. Just a fresh-up14:08
smartboyhw13.04 is now basically un-deleted (even Rick Spencer says that)14:08
zequenceI'm wondering why there hasn't been a feature freeze announcement though, so I guess they are still talking. 14:09
zequenceIf there's no 13.10, we'll make custom releases now and then14:10
smartboyhwzequence, BTW I think ~ubuntustudio-release still hasn't been added in ISO QA Tracker. And also, I saw the annoucement:P14:10
smartboyhwzequence, that's the plan14:10
smartboyhwzequence, you did subscribe to ubuntu-devel-announce mailing list do you?14:10
zequencehmm, perhaps I'm not14:11
smartboyhwzequence, https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-announce/2013-March/001021.html14:12
zequenceUsually there's an announcement on ubuntu-release14:12
smartboyhwHmm it didn't this time14:12
zequenceThe problem with my dark background has a lot to do with me doing those in the evening14:13
smartboyhwzequence, uh14:13
zequenceGraphic artists would be aware of those things from experience14:14
zequenceThe contrast is too low. There should be more light with the dark14:14
smartboyhwscott-work, will Dick Macinnis still do artwork for us?14:14
scott-worksmartboyhw: he might. i haven't contacted him though. he seems pretty busy with dream studio, talking about rewriting stuff like sound-applet for control jack, etc14:18
smartboyhwscott-work, yep14:19
scott-workzequence: i really like the second image14:19
zequencescott-work: The second is more of a cover for social sites, etc. And more of an example at that too.14:20
zequencescott-work: You'll need to look close to see the details, since it's really too dark14:20
scott-workzequence: one thing i would suggest for the first image, if it is to be used for a desktop wallpaper, is to make the CoF lighter or faded so that it does draw the eye too much, become too much of a focus, and dominate the desktop14:20
scott-workbut that is just my personal opinions, doesn't make anyone right or wrong14:21
zequencescott-work: I'm also considering the web theme we have. There's a slight correlation between that and Ubuntu artwork. I'm thinking about looking at using the background of our website to do something too14:21
zequencescott-work: CoF?14:21
scott-workCircle of Friends (or in our case, Circle of Sound Waves)14:22
zequenceI don't think the website background patter is good for a desktop wallpaper as is, so it would need to be redone. Just thinking about patterns, and how they could be used14:22
zequencescott-work: Aha :)14:22
zequenceOne could also have the same pattern have different materials, so while the website is glowing like lights, a desktop wallpaper could be carbon, etc14:23
zequenceAlso, that would make it easier to keep a distinct Ubuntu Studio look for the future, being able to quite easily refresh it without too much work14:24
zequenceOne thing about the pattern in the website background is that the dots are really small14:26
zequenceI'd like them to be bigger14:26
zequenceBut, maybe that wouldn't work.. I don't know14:27
zequenceAt least I'll have a wallpaper ready this weekend14:27
smartboyhwzequence, but then do we want to implement it for 13.04 or?14:28
zequenceAfter 13.04, I'd want us to develop some kind of unified theme14:28
zequenceWe need a new wallpaper for 13.0414:28
zequenceWhich one isn't imporant to me, as long as it's a nice one14:28
smartboyhwzequence, well maybe we can ship multiple wallpapers (like Lubuntu) and let them choose....14:30
smartboyhwzequence, XD Ralf called your wallpaper Sexist (LOL)14:30
zequencesmartboyhw: We usually do ship multiple. Perhaps not for a while now. we just need to get together more than one wallpaper14:44
smartboyhwzequence, :)15:09
scott-workzequence: that's an interesting concept: keep the base the same but adjust the hue depending on usage location15:44
smartboyhwzequence, we are having problems into getting newest version of blender in.15:44
scott-work(or saturation)15:44
smartboyhwpowerpc build is always the one  breaking things15:44
scott-workmy personal preferences for a desktop (and by extension the wallpaper) is not a fancy, blingy thing. it should muted, perhaps dark-ish but not dark, and should not distract or draw attention15:47
* smartboyhw says good night15:47
scott-workgood night smartboyhw 15:47
zequencescott-work: Those are things I agree on too. It should be practical, yet give the feeling of completeness15:49
scott-workzequence: right!15:50
zequenceWell, not "yet"15:50
scott-workmy vision upon a time was to make a wallpaper that looks "stonish" (i.e. the a fine stone pattern, one piece almost indistinguishable from the other almost to the point of being uniform gray) with the ubuntu studio CoF on the lower right corner looking like a chiseled relief15:51
scott-workthe CoF would look slightly worn as if by time15:52
scott-workthe over all tenor would be one of lasting or sustainable stength, something enduring all weathers15:52
zequenceThat would not work together with the idea of a pattern, but it sounds like something that would look really great on a wallpaper, yes15:55
zequenceThere are many things that you can draw from just being inspired by anyone of our workflows, but I'm finding it hard to find something that represents them all15:55
zequencepatterns are great in that way, cause they don't need to symbolize anything. 15:56
zequenceWell, a stonish pattern would also be a pattern15:56
zequenceYou could make a wallpaper that looked like a 2x12 speaker, and it would be dark, and simplistic, but would also mainly represent the audio workflow15:58
zequenceIt would even include patterns15:58
zequenceWould make a lot of sense to have many new wallpapers for each release15:59
zequenceNot just for variation, but to showcase graphical art done on Ubuntu/Ubuntu Studio15:59
zequenceActually, why not showcase stuff that people did in all our workflows on our website? One would need to find people who used Ubuntu Studio to do their work.16:00
zequenceWell, not a prio anyway..16:01
scott-workzequence: i had thought about featuring ubuntu studio artist on the website before, but not focusing on the work flows16:24
scott-workthat _would_ be a great validation though :)16:24
zequencescott-work: have you seent this? https://www.facebook.com/Ubuntustudio?sk=page_insights16:45
zequenceReally makes you think about the value of PR16:46
scott-worki'll have to look at it on my phone, just a moment16:48
=== jta is now known as jta_afk
scott-workyou mean reaching the 2930 people?  yeah, that is pretty crazy16:52
scott-workin 7 days no less16:53
=== jta_ is now known as jta
=== jta is now known as JTa
* micahg sees the crazy has spilled over to the studio dev list...20:52
zequencescott-work: I think it might be good for us to opt in for the Beta1. We won't loose anything by doing it anyway. Would you care to answer the post "Opt-in beta 1 next week" on ubuntu-release?22:12
scott-worksure, i can do that22:12
scott-workdone and done22:13
zequenceThanks22:13
zequenceI should probably contact ubuntuone people again. Been about two months since I bought some music there, and still no delivery22:33
zequenceWonder why our ISO failed to build over something that all distros have, and seemingly only ours failed?22:45
micahgzequence: hopefully with the recent uploads it'll work tomorrow, if not, feel free to poke, I'll take a look sat night if no one beats me to it22:47
zequencemicahg: Thanks.22:59
len_1304zequence, look at the lmms stuff23:05
len_1304It seems the new one depends on an older lmms-common.23:05
len_1304lmms : Depends: lmms-common (= 0.4.13-0ubuntu1) but 0.4.14-0ubuntu2 is installed23:06
zequencelen_1304: Ok. I only read the bottom.23:08
zequenceThat looks more like US specific in deed23:08
len_1304It is an LMMS bug23:09
len_1304IDK if it is bad in debian as well or just ubuntu23:10
zequencelen_1304: lmms was just updated to a newer version. I'd blame Ubuntu first23:13
zequenceBut, who knows. I should check the source23:14
len_1304It should be a package problem, not source. It would be in the deb control file.23:15
zequenceThe package is source too23:15
len_1304Either on the debian site or ours23:15
zequenceAnd was what I was referring to23:16
len_1304OK23:16
zequenceThere's one patch added by Ubuntu AFAIK23:16
zequencelen_1304: hmm, I thought you were talking about the ISO build23:21
zequenceWhat was the problem you were having with lmms?23:22
len_1304Wouldn't bad depends effect that?23:22
zequenceIt didn't get to that point23:22
zequenceIt's in the build log23:22
zequenceHas to do with print stuff that all the flavors have23:22
len_1304Ok, I am going to bug the lmms thing anyway.23:23
zequenceupgrading did have a problem, yes23:24
len_1304Bug #115280723:31
ubottubug 1152807 in lmms (Ubuntu) "lmms packge asks for older lmms-common, but new lmms-common is installed" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/115280723:31
zequencelen_1304: I didn't have that problem myself. It complained over the newer version wanting to overwrite the desktop file23:33
zequenceapt-get install -f fixed it23:33
len_1304Yes, but depends is still worng23:33
zequencelen_1304: Not here. It looks fine for me23:34
zequenceI'm on amd64 if that makes a difference..23:34
zequenceVersion: 0.4.14-0ubuntu223:35
zequenceDepends: lmms-common (= 0.4.14-0ubuntu2)23:35
len_1304Shouldn't its not a wine thing. after using -f it installed for me.23:35
len_1304Maybe it has been fixed in between when it failed and I used -f23:36
zequenceWell, I didn't have the problem with versions23:36
len_1304Yes it has. your version is ubuntu2, the one that failed was 123:36
zequenceAh, right. It must have been uploaded shortly after then23:37
zequenceer, no23:37
zequenceYou're talking about 0.4.1323:37
len_130414 was looking for 13 instead of 14.23:38
zequenceWell, as I said, I didn't get any dependency problems23:39
zequenceThere was a 0.4.14-0ubuntu1, where 0.4.14-0ubuntu2 only added a patch23:40
zequenceDon't think the former was ever released though23:42
zequenceWas updated before it could23:42
len_1304They are a day apart, but I don't know.23:44

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!