=== mohits1 is now known as mohits [17:13] fss: oie [20:34] boring airport lounge is boring [21:10] hi davecheney [21:28] hello everyone [21:34] davecheney: I'm thinking of returning to contribute to the local provider [21:35] what is the best way? [21:35] to send small code to review? or work in a branch? [21:37] andrewsmedina: we always do work on an lp branch [21:37] andrewsmedina: how is your bzr fu ? [21:39] andrewsmedina: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~juju/juju-core/trunk/view/head:/CONTRIBUTING [21:39] should be a first step to get you going [21:44] davecheney: I already contributed with juju [21:45] andrewsmedina: the new Go port ? [21:45] I wanted to know the best approach (small or big patches) [21:45] davecheney: yes [21:46] andrewsmedina: I would say small patches is always a good start [21:46] but a better start is to discuss your idea first on the mailing list [21:46] to save time and rework [21:47] davecheney: some times ago I started the local provisioner for juju-core [21:47] davecheney: now I have time to continue this work [21:48] for OpenStack provisioner is being kept a branch? [21:48] that is great, frank (themue) has been doing some work on the local provider during this sprint we had this week [21:49] so i would email him via the juju-dev mailing list to see where the gaps are [21:49] its nice [21:49] the openstack provider is done in two parts [21:49] the first is the goose package, which is like goamz, it is a general, go based, openstack library [21:49] the second part, the openstack provisioner lives in environs/openstack [21:49] and uses goose as its backend, in the same way the ec2 provider uses the goamz pacakge [21:50] ah, ok [21:50] i have heard there is a large Maas provider branch which is being developed [21:50] I will send a email to juju-dev [21:50] and we're hoping those guys will merge their branch soon, as the merge process will prbably be a bit large [21:50] andrewsmedina: excellent, i'll watch for it and be sure to chase folks up when I get back to australia in a few days [21:53] davecheney: thanks :)