[03:29] <tigrang> Is there a way to get hover and mouse click event on dbusmenu_menuitem?
[04:20] <micahg> jamespage: is there any hope with Java 7 and packages that use the sun image libraries?
[06:01] <Whoopie> debfx: Hi, running ubuntu raring in virtualbox, I get the following message with "LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose glxinfo": "libGL error: dlopen /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dri/vboxvideo_dri.so failed (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dri/vboxvideo_dri.so: undefined symbol: XCompositeQueryExtension)"
[06:01] <Whoopie> debfx: does it influence the 3d part?
[07:25] <smartboyhw> Any patch pilots?
[09:42] <mitya57> DktrKranz: Hi again, will you review ubuntu-packaging-guide? It's not urgent, but I'd like to know if we should do a separate upload to Ubuntu or if we'll be able to sync it...
[10:00] <DktrKranz> mitya57: sync time, it's been just ACCEPTED :)
[10:05] <mitya57> DktrKranz: yay, thanks again!
[11:41] <debfx> Whoopie: probably. I think I have a fix for that.
[12:30] <c_korn> hello, although there is hardening enabled in my debian/rules file (compat 9) lintian still gives the warning "W: libcxx-gtk-utils-2-2.0-0: hardening-no-fortify-functions usr/lib/libcxx-gtk-utils-2-2.0.so.0.2.1"  http://0bin.net/paste/ef491bada67a2b7f6595695322aa696a6de67c35#aIvncN5nMQRYT4bsyjIrR8XOxrYmcDYV+aH5apTdlbI=
[12:32] <jtaylor> c_korn: that check has many false positives, check that the flags are correctly passed to gcc (via bhlc) and override or ignore it
[12:36] <c_korn> interesting idea to check the build flags in the log file. seems I have to make it verbose first: http://0bin.net/paste/a4c538a4d6a76c825dcb97bb0f748d6d9e193a2a#v4sWp0kMj2hQkvPIkGKVog7Wm4zalpHISKIsgopVYos=
[12:36] <jtaylor> always make package builds verbose
[12:44] <c_korn> ok, now blhc outputs nothing
[12:47] <c_korn> hum, but even when I comment out the hardening lines in debian/rules blhc does not output anything
[12:50] <jtaylor> how does a compilation line look like then?
[12:51] <c_korn> ah, ok. "blhc --all" reports lines when I comment out the hardening in debian/rules. "blhc --all" outputs nothing when I uncomment it again. thanks, jtaylor.
[12:53] <c_korn> so I think it is save to write a lintian override
[14:13] <Whoopie> debfx: nice
[14:14] <Whoopie> debfx: btw, is it okay that glxinfo shows llvmpipe instead of chromium with vbox 4.2.8? previous versions showed chromium.
[14:15] <debfx> Whoopie: the other problem is: the kernel module is loaded too late (after the X server started)
[14:15] <debfx> no, it should say chromium
[14:16] <Whoopie> debfx: ah, as a workaround, could I put vboxvideo into /etc/modules to fix it?
[14:17] <debfx> yeah that should work
[14:17] <Whoopie> ok
[14:54] <Whoopie> debfx: fyi, I backported your 4.2.8 package to precise and glxinfo also shows llvmpipe.
[14:54] <Whoopie> debfx: even though /var/log/Xorg.0.log shows that vboxvideo is loaded by X.
[14:56] <debfx> Whoopie: you're talking about the backported X stack, right?
[14:57] <Whoopie> debfx: no, it's still the old X stack which came with precise.
[14:58] <debfx> the X Server 1.11 auto-loads vboxvideo so missing the kernel module can't be the problem there
[15:01] <Whoopie> debfx: right
[15:31] <cjwatson> bdmurray,ev: I have a crash that I'm still experiencing frequently that was marked Invalid in the middle of last year due to an alleged lack of continuing reports.  I'd like to try to find out whether there are more reports of it on errors.  Is there a way to figure out the bucket for a given Launchpad bug number so that I can refer to that, or failing that to get a list of all the reports for a given package rather than ...
[15:31] <cjwatson> ... just the top 100?
[15:43] <xnox> hmm... there was a magic errors url for reverse lookup.
[15:47] <smartboyhw> xnox, are you operational on Sundays?
[15:49] <bdmurray> cjwatson: https://errors.ubuntu.com/api/1.0/most-common-problems/?format=json&package=apport&limit=250
[15:49] <bdmurray> you can adjust limit there
[15:50] <bdmurray> and I thought I had some code to find the bucket from an apport report
[15:53] <bdmurray> I'm not finding it right away but will look around later today or Monday
[15:55] <xnox> cjwatson: or if you submit that crash, you can open firefox 'http://errors.ubuntu.com/user/'$(printf $(sudo cat /sys/class/dmi/id/product_uuid) | sha512sum) find your crash which should get you to the bucket....
[16:00] <debfx> hm how do I change the runlevels of an init script in postinst? update-rc.d remove before adding the symlinks again?
[16:05]  * penguin42 wonders if all ASRock motherboards have the UUID 03000200-0400-0500-0006-000700080009  like mine
[16:08] <xnox> penguin42: hm. we are product_uuid buddies! \o/ 03000200-0400-0500-0006-000700080009
[16:08] <penguin42> :-)
[16:09] <xnox> penguin42: basically errors.u.c times out and crashes when I try to view it since probably us two are not the only onces with that product_uuid.
[16:09] <xnox> penguin42: is your computer "microsoft windows certified" machine?
[16:10] <penguin42> xnox: Mine the manufacturer, product name, version, serial number, sku number and family are all 'To Be Filled By O.E.M.'
[16:10] <xnox> penguin42: same here.
[16:10] <penguin42> xnox: It's an ASRock P55M Pro
[16:11] <xnox> I'm using Latvian PC manufacturer Gauja, so I guess a few OEM can't be bothered to change those values, extra work for no gain.
[16:11] <penguin42> xnox: Yeh, I just bought the board and built the machine
[16:14] <xnox> ev: ^^^^ we have a clash,  03000200-0400-0500-0006-000700080009 should be blacklisted product_uuid, as that is a placeholder.
[16:15] <penguin42> xnox: any reason you don't use an install time generated UUID instead?
[16:15] <xnox> penguin42: good point. the other alternative was to use MAC address.
[16:16] <penguin42> yeh, MAC isn't bad as long as you're consistent about which one you use on a machine with multiple cards
[16:22] <ogra_> xnox, does that mean you got it booting now ?
[16:23] <xnox> ogra_: =( still using my laptop.
[16:23] <ogra_> ah :(
[16:23] <xnox> ogra_: it's my laptop which is latvian, my new pc is of a mixed origin.
[16:23] <ogra_> yeah, i saw the pics :)
[16:24] <xnox> ogra_: so far i have recommendations that it's either dodgy power supply or dodgy memory.
[16:24] <ogra_> i would bet on the latter
[16:25] <xnox> ogra_: i am pondering to test with http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/2GB-2x1GB-Hynix-240-pin-PC3-10600-DDR3-SDRAM-DIMM-Desktop-Memory-Dell-Supplied-/140925738374?_trksid=p5197.m1992&_trkparms=aid%3D111000%26algo%3DREC.CURRENT%26ao%3D1%26asc%3D14%26meid%3D6147530541338586150%26pid%3D100015%26prg%3D1006%26rk%3D1%26sd%3D140925738374%26
[16:41] <Joshun> hi
[16:41] <Joshun> anyone know how to get this to compile in ubuntu 12.10:
[16:41] <Joshun> https://developer.gnome.org/gnome-devel-demos/unstable/button.c.html.en
[16:41] <Joshun> I have libgtk-3-dev installed
[16:42] <Joshun> is it just not new enough?
[16:44] <Joshun> is gtk3 just a bad choice or something
[18:22] <cjwatson> bdmurray: hm, I can't find it there, and xnox's link returns a mostly-blank page with just the header and footer.  Can you find a bucket for bug 905582 or else figure out why it isn't getting reported?
[18:23] <cjwatson> (it's private)
[18:27] <cjwatson> I guess it could be bug 888036 instead, but I'm not sure why apport redirected me to 905582 then