[07:35] <dholbach> good morning
[12:26] <c2tarun> can anyone please in figuring out that why is my 91% RAM is full? http://paste.ubuntu.com/5604638/   when I took this data only steam was running with downloading a game. But my 91% RAM is full.
[12:26] <c2tarun> sorry wrong channel :(
[12:27] <Zhenech> its not
[12:27] <Zhenech> it's about 1/3 full
[12:27] <Zhenech> rest is buffers, cache, which gets cleaned when needed
[12:28] <jpds> !ram | c2tarun
[12:28] <Zhenech> jpds, cheater ;)
[12:31] <c2tarun> Zhenech, jpds thanks :)
[15:11] <lfaraone> ScottK: Could you copy over the OpenAFS SRU?
[15:11] <ScottK> Sure.
[15:15] <ScottK> lfaraone: Done.
[15:22] <lfaraone> Thanks!
[18:35] <ESphynx> 'morning
[20:04] <Logan_> Does anyone know why ghc 7.6.2-1 hasn't migrated from raring-proposed to raring yet? There doesn't appear to be a reason for it in the excuses.
[20:04] <Laney> look in output, not excuses
[20:05] <Logan_> The output doesn't make much sense to me. :/
[20:05] <Laney> perhaps not, but it does explain why
[20:05] <Laney> "huge gnarly transition"
[20:05] <Laney> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/ghc.html is a better view
[20:05] <Logan_> Oh, I see.
[20:06] <Logan_> But those builds are against the current ghc version in raring, no?
[20:06] <Laney> that page shows raring and raring-proposed
[20:06] <Laney> the highest version
[20:09] <ESphynx> ScottK: hi :)
[20:09] <ScottK> Hi ESphynx
[20:10] <ESphynx> ScottK: So I released 0.44.04 yesterday, put it on mentors.debian.net :) I'm hoping it will make it into Raring =)
[20:10] <ScottK> Is it bug fix only over what we have now or are there new features?
[20:10] <ESphynx> ScottK: that's the new features .
[20:10] <ESphynx> ScottK: 64 bit support
[20:11] <ScottK> Then you'll need to file a feature freeze exception request.
[20:11] <ESphynx> before it didn't have 64 bit support
[20:11] <ESphynx> ScottK: it's not integrated into Debian yet though... not sure if xnox will have time to sponsor it
[20:11] <ScottK> See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess
[20:12] <ESphynx> ScottK: so I should go ahead and file a LP bug before the package is into Debian?
[20:12] <ScottK> Yes.  You can go ahead.
[20:16] <ESphynx> ScottK: How's that https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ecere-sdk/+bug/1153763
[20:17] <ScottK> ESphynx: That's a start.  There's other information asked for.
[20:18] <ESphynx> I suck at reading.
[20:18] <ESphynx> An explanation of the testing which has been performed on the new version in Ubuntu, including verification that the new package: ... You mean this?
[20:19] <ScottK> IIRC build logs too.
[20:20] <ESphynx> ScottK: I have a ppa that built with it on Debian, would that be good?
[20:20] <ESphynx> on Raring*
[20:20] <ScottK> Yes.
[20:22] <Logan_> Gah, is there a setting for pbuilder so that it doesn't use old cached versions of packages if the requested Build-Depends doesn't exist?
[20:23] <jtaylor> export APTCACHE=""
[20:24] <Logan_> But that turns off the cache altogether, no?
[20:24] <ESphynx> ScottK: how's that https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ecere-sdk/+bug/1153763
[20:24] <ScottK> ESphynx: I'm doing $work at the moment, so I can't really look at it in detail.  Just make sure you provide all the information asked for.
[20:25] <ESphynx> ScottK : thanks.
[22:53]  * Laney wonders why Haskell library developers bump dep version requirements for no apparent reason
[23:13] <LordOfTime> can i get a bugfix into raring for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nginx/+bug/1132678 due to "high" priority?  It doesn't modify features, so I"m not sure it needs FFe
[23:14] <TheLordOfTime> assuming I upload the debdiff that is
[23:23] <ScottK> TheLordOfTime: bug fixes don't need an FFe.
[23:30] <TheLordOfTime> ScottK, so they'll still get through sponsorship given freeze?
[23:37] <jtaylor> how does one get access to error reports on errors.ubuntu.com?
[23:40] <cjohnston> jtaylor: bugsquad
[23:40] <cjohnston> iirc
[23:41] <jtaylor> I am in bugsquad but it tells me no access :(
[23:43] <cjohnston> bugcontrol then maybe?
[23:45] <jtaylor> in there, not bugsquad
[23:45] <jtaylor> control > squad I guess?
[23:47] <cjohnston> looks like maybe it got taken away
[23:47] <cjohnston> ask ev
[23:54] <TheLordOfTime> cjohnston, bugcontrol.
[23:55] <TheLordOfTime> (confirming your second sttement)
[23:55] <TheLordOfTime> statement*
[23:56] <TheLordOfTime> at the minimum, i think.