autoditac | hey everyone. is this the right question to ask questions regarding nfs on ubuntu? | 01:38 |
---|---|---|
autoditac | s/question/channel | 01:39 |
xnox | autoditac: #ubuntu-server sounds more appropriate channel. | 01:39 |
autoditac | xnox, thanks! | 01:39 |
ppisati | moin | 07:11 |
=== smb` is now known as smb | ||
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
Eimann | https://lwn.net/Articles/542664/ | 11:12 |
henrix | rofl | 11:17 |
Eimann | :) | 11:17 |
=== kentb-out is now known as kentb | ||
rtg_ | ogasawara, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1011449/comments/7 | 14:22 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1011449 in linux "[Feature] Include support for Intel Bordenville chipset (i2c (SMBUS), Watchdog timer and PCI IDS)" [Medium,Fix committed] | 14:22 |
ogasawara | rtg_: ack, thanks | 14:28 |
rtg_ | ogasawara, also https://bugs.launchpad.net/intel/+bug/1031162/comments/2 | 14:28 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1031162 in linux "[Feature] Haswell-ULT UART DMA support" [Undecided,Fix committed] | 14:28 |
rtg_ | ogasawara, prolly time for an upload today | 14:29 |
ogasawara | rtg_: indeed | 14:29 |
rtg_ | now that I've attached a giant bag of shit to our kernel | 14:29 |
ogasawara | hehe | 14:29 |
rtg_ | I'll get some boot testing done first | 14:30 |
ogasawara | ack | 14:30 |
* ppisati back in ~20 | 14:32 | |
* ogasawara back in 20 | 14:40 | |
dhanasekaran | Hi Guys How to debug glic package | 15:22 |
=== rsalveti_ is now known as rsalveti | ||
infinity | plars: You've had a regression-testing task for linux/lucid open for 12 days. Did it get forgotten? | 15:57 |
plars | infinity: no, I commented about the bug that I opened, last I talked to john I wasn't clear if this was a bug in the tests or in one of the patches from the CVE. He's still trying to hunt it down. | 15:58 |
plars | infinity: I can go ahead and just mark it failed if that makes things go easier | 15:59 |
plars | infinity: this is https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1136526 you are talking about right? | 15:59 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1136526 in kernel-sru-workflow/regression-testing "linux: 2.6.32-46.105 -proposed tracker" [Medium,In progress] | 15:59 |
infinity | plars: Ahh, I didn't notice it was blocking on another bug. All good. I'll let jjohansen deal with it. | 16:03 |
ppisati | guess what? | 17:10 |
* ppisati -> gym | 17:10 | |
* rtg_ -> lunch | 17:55 | |
* henrix -> EOD | 18:08 | |
* cking -> EOW | 18:18 | |
* smb -> EOW | 18:26 | |
* rtg_ -> EOW | 19:19 | |
* ogasawara lunch | 19:24 | |
kirkland | is it possible to force usb down to usb1 only? | 20:02 |
kirkland | I have a device that's not cooperating with usb2 | 20:02 |
kirkland | and I don't see an ehci_hcd module | 20:03 |
JanC | kirkland: you can blacklist USB2 modules of course | 20:06 |
kirkland | JanC: and what's that module called? | 20:07 |
sforshee | much of the core USB stuff is built-in for stock ubuntu kernels | 20:09 |
kirkland | sforshee: yeah, that's what it's lookin' like | 20:10 |
JanC | hm, maybe it's still possible to disable USB2 for particular devices using udev? | 20:10 |
sforshee | JanC, not sure. I don't think it's as simple as turning off a piece of software. | 20:11 |
sforshee | iirc negotiation between full- and high-speed USB starts way down at the signaling level | 20:11 |
JanC | sforshee: I know in the past you could disable it | 20:11 |
JanC | but maybe not on a per-device level :-/ | 20:12 |
JanC | also, USB 1.0 or 1.1 are quite different AFAIK | 20:14 |
JanC | USB 1.1 devices should be compatible with USB 2.x & 3.x | 20:14 |
JanC | USB 1.0 OTOH... | 20:14 |
sforshee | kirkland, I'm not finding anything other than rebuilding with ehci_hcd as a module and blacklisting it, of course then you lose high-speed usb for all ports | 20:16 |
JanC | or maybe finding an usb 1.0 controller | 20:17 |
kirkland | sforshee: okay, thanks | 20:22 |
kirkland | sforshee: yeah, I understand | 20:23 |
kirkland | sforshee: this is for debugging, mainly | 20:23 |
kirkland | sforshee: I'll get a debug kernel together; cheers! | 20:23 |
sforshee | kirkland, np | 20:23 |
JanC | kirkland: is this device listed in e.g. usb-devices output? | 20:23 |
kirkland | JanC: oh, yeah, absolutely; it's just the communications are wonky and I've read by some that they've had better success when disabling usb2 | 20:24 |
kirkland | fwiw, I'm debugging a long standing problem i've had with irregularaties reading solar data from my PV inverter | 20:24 |
JanC | so in theory it's at least USB 1.1, I suppose | 20:25 |
JanC | or 1.10 or whatever | 20:25 |
mjg59 | stgraber: Oh hey all my woes today turn out to be your fault | 20:36 |
mjg59 | Makes a change :) | 20:36 |
mjg59 | stgraber: Oh, I tell a lie | 20:48 |
mjg59 | stgraber: It's actually James Leddy's fault | 20:48 |
wmp | hello, i kabe installed 3.8.3 on 12.10 from packages, how to install nvidia drivers on this kernel? | 21:38 |
stgraber | mjg59: what happened? :) | 21:54 |
mjg59 | stgraber: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/trousers/+bug/1155780 | 21:54 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1155780 in trousers "Postinst fails in chroot environments" [Undecided,New] | 21:54 |
stgraber | mjg59: ah, sounds like it's still my fault for having introduced that code in the dev release even if I wasn't the one SRUing it... | 21:56 |
stgraber | mjg59: can you confirm that the following works: http://paste.ubuntu.com/5617788/ | 21:58 |
stgraber | mjg59: that's the logic in current trousers. If that works, we should get that uploaded to 12.04 and 12.10 | 21:58 |
mjg59 | stgraber: Hrm. I /suspect/ that that would still trigger in the chroot | 22:11 |
mjg59 | stgraber: We're actually building images, so udev will have been installed | 22:11 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!