[00:48] <sharms> I have a very small fix for gnome-system-monitor, so it supports CTRL-Q if someone could take a look: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-system-monitor/+bug/1155385
[00:52] <micahg> sharms: that looks like the sort of thing that should be pushed upstream and accepted there before patching
[01:05] <sharms> micahg: It is already upstream, but getting it in before 13.04 is released sounds like a good idea
[01:06] <sharms> ie 12.10 supported CTRL-Q, and nearly all apps do in 13.04 that I use atleast
[01:06] <micahg> sharms: so, it's a regression over 12.10?
[01:07] <micahg> and, you're saying it's already upstream, do you have a link to the cgit commit?
[01:08] <micahg> the upstream bug shows as open still
[01:14] <aboudreault> looks like something is missing in my rules: dpkg-genchanges: error: cannot read files list file: No such file or directory
[01:18] <aboudreault> good, fixed.
[01:24] <sharms> micahg: If I can get it accepted before release we can just pull the newer upstream version in, but if I can't it doesn't make a ton of sense not to put it in 13.04, as I do believe it's a regression
[01:25] <micahg> sharms: the ctrl+q functionality was in 12.10?
[01:25] <micahg> sharms: I'm just saying it should be committed upstream, not necessarily released
[01:26] <sharms> micahg: yes I can confirm CTRL-Q works as expected and shows up in the menu as expected in 12.10
[01:27] <micahg> the upstream bug doesn't say anything about regression either, that might make it be accepted faster
[01:28] <micahg> or at least looked at
[01:28] <micahg> I'll mark up our bug based on your feedback
[01:29] <sharms> ok, I am going to send an email to the maintainer to explain and see if I can get them to take a look
[07:26] <dholbach> good morning
[16:35] <xnox> friday is a day when one finds out about qt4-x11 build-depending on libgtk2.0-dev and is not surprised and finds it acceptable.
[16:41] <micahg> xnox: it's not unreasonable if you read the changelog either :)  http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/q/qt4-x11/current/changelog#version4.5.0_rc1-1
[16:44]  * xnox was starring at an app and thinking why is it using gtk2 theme and it hit me.
[16:44] <xnox> it was just a confirmation really ;-)
[17:51] <roaksoax>  /win 13
[19:40] <ESphynx> xnox:  qt4-x11 build-depending on libgtk2.0-dev -- This is 'exactly' why the Linux world needs to adopt Ecere :P
[19:40] <ESphynx> that's the cherry on top of the dependency nightmare of the bulky GUI toolkits ;)
[19:41] <ESphynx> theme support... GUI toolkits looking 'native'... meh ;)
[20:40] <jtaylor> is there hidden trick to get a raw diff from code.google?
[20:41] <jtaylor> the github way of doing it does not work :/
[21:44] <ScottK> Someone ought to merge lighttpd from Debian.  New security upload needs merge.
[22:41] <jtaylor> ScottK: can we get this fix for pyqt in raring? http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/pipermail/pyqt/2013-March/032457.html
[22:41] <jtaylor> breaks ipython qtconsole :/
[22:41] <ScottK> jtaylor: If you can figure out which commit it is ....
[22:42] <ScottK> I looked at the next snapshot after he said he was going to fix it and couldn't find anything that made sense.
[22:42] <jtaylor> you already know about it?
[22:42] <ScottK> Yeah, I just couldn't figure the fix.
[22:42] <jtaylor> hm
[22:42] <ScottK> I didn't know it broke anything anyone cared about though.
[22:42] <ScottK> I'm subscribed to the list.
[22:43] <jtaylor> it also breaks ninja ide
[22:43] <ScottK> You could always write the list and ask for the patch.
[22:43] <jtaylor> yes I wanted to do that
[22:43] <ScottK> ipython and ninjas to particularly move my personal caring needle, so please go for it.
[22:44] <jtaylor> does sip have a vcs?
[22:45] <ScottK> It does, but I don't know if it's public.
[22:45] <ScottK> The developer is not particularly into collaboration.
[22:50] <jtaylor> also no archived snapshots :/
[22:54] <jtaylor> someone should check the site every day and put the snapshot on github ._.
[22:54]  * jtaylor hates upstreams with no vcs
[22:57] <ScottK> jtaylor: I still have the snapshot.  Want it?
[22:57] <jtaylor> yes
[22:59] <ScottK> jtaylor: http://kitterman.com/kubuntu/PyQt-x11-gpl-4.9.5.tar.gz
[22:59] <ScottK> Wait.
[22:59] <ScottK> That's wrong.
[22:59] <ScottK> jtaylor: http://kitterman.com/kubuntu/sip-4.14.5-snapshot-c65a525a0a17.tar.gz
[22:59]  * ScottK should really clean that out.
[23:00] <jtaylor> according to the changelog the fix is in pyqt
[23:02] <ScottK> Hmmm.
[23:02] <jtaylor> this should be it: http://paste.ubuntu.com/5617940/
[23:03] <jtaylor> of course its generated code :/
[23:04] <ScottK> OK.  I'm thinking of a different issue then.
[23:04] <ScottK> Feel free to fix.
[23:04]  * ScottK didn't get around to uploading to Debian yet anyway.
[23:05] <jtaylor> I know nothing about pyqt and sip
[23:05] <jtaylor> does the package regenerate the sip files?
[23:05] <ScottK> Probably not.
[23:25] <jtaylor> hmpf to slow with resizing my partition ._.
[23:55] <jtaylor> did not seem to help