/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2013/03/16/#lubuntu.txt

miglois there anything like kaffeine for Lubuntu to watch tv (dvb-t)?00:12
migloand another question ... where can configure proxy settings at Lubuntu to access the web?00:14
phillwmiglo: usually kde stuff does not try to pull in 20 million dependancys in. I'd suggest asking synaptic package manager to install it; it will then tell you everything else it needs to work. We do not have a dvb-t system native to lubuntu.00:18
lxletvtime still works for me00:22
miglotvtime looks promising - thanks for the hint00:26
migloI'm thinking about to switch completely from kubuntu to lubuntu, so I'm checking how to replace my favorite applications00:28
BWMerlinIs Lubuntu likely to use wayland or ill it follow ubuntu into Mir?01:37
lxlenot sure, but it seems like mark wants to follow google and start making major components of the os in house, in my eyes it looks like taking the hardwork of others and trying to proprietize it01:41
lxleand i know thats not a word lol01:41
phillwBWMerlin: what ubuntu do for their desktop is for them, we do not use unity, Mir etc.02:11
keithclarkI like Lubuntu and teh possibility of using it on my machines but the following really concerned me:  Please note that Lubuntu 12.04 is not an LTS (5 years support), but a 'standard' release, supported for 18 months. This is simply due the fact there is insufficient 'man-power' to commit to 5 years of support.04:38
lxlethat is true,04:39
lxlehowever, since its built off the same source code, the guts of that os will be supported for 5 years, maybe not offically but at least through updates04:39
keithclarkI would think that this would match a rolling release perfectly then.04:40
keithclarkEven if not stated, that is actually what it is04:40
lxleto some extent yes, however updates will not continue past what is appropriate for the lts release04:41
keithclarkMaybe that statement then could be stated another way?  To build confidence rather than disuade it>?04:42
keithclarkTo me that statement says here is a release, it is as good as we have people to maintain it.04:43
keithclark>Hey, just my thoughts04:43
keithclarkBuild confidence in=actual confidence performed04:44
lxleyou can always install ubuntu or xubuntu etc04:44
lxleif you want the confidence04:44
lxlealthough to me its not that much different04:45
keithclarkYup, I'm just adding my opinions here04:45
lxleare you going to calling canonical for a lubuntu machine?04:45
keithclark?04:45
lxlein other words, how many people will being paying canoncial for professional support on a lubuntu pc04:46
lxlemost lubuntu computers are made up from older machines, usually personal machines,04:46
lxleto me, being an average person, besides the updates and stability04:47
lxlelts means nothing04:47
lxlei'm not a company needing canonicals paid support04:47
keithclarkI'm still not sure what that has to do with my comments04:47
lxleneeding reassurance of lubuntu being supported for five years,04:47
lxlethe guts of it are naturally supported04:47
keithclarkOk, then go rolling04:47
keithclarkDon't claim to be aroung for 5 years.  Claim to support the best you can now.04:48
lxlei heard it explained like this, lets say there is a new version of lxterm, it might not be updated and or backported to lubuntu 12.0404:49
lxleu must seperate in your mind the desktop from the os04:50
keithclarkand?04:50
lxlethey compliment eachother , they are not the same, no LTS support is for the Lubuntu desktop, not for the core ubuntu system04:51
keithclarkLook, you produce a very good o/s.  You have a great repository. Why waste that with revisions and long term supports?.  You will always support the current, rolliing release.04:51
keithclarkKeep the vision in mind of course04:52
keithclarkSet your goals of how lightweight you wnat to be.04:52
keithclarkhow old the minimum hardware can be >(that is the oldest the oldest revision can be)04:52
lxleyou must look at the inbetween releases as betas04:52
lxleand the lts release as the commercial product04:53
keithclarkI understand that.  I also understand that if I use older hardware, I 'm not interested in the latest and greatest.  How much can really change over the short term if I'm really looking to keep my older hardware alive?04:55
lxleplenty, older hardware gets dropped in support on with each new release04:56
keithclarkIt seems to me as though you have a philosophy of keeping an Ubuntu version for the older machines current, but you don't have to release as many changes as the true Ubuntu does.  It would serve no purpose.04:57
lxlecase in point the last release to lubuntu 12.10 dropped support for many older graphics cards04:57
lxlenot lubuntu's fault but nvidia and ati04:57
lxlein the older release the older drivers were available and worked without issue04:57
keithclarkAh, I understand you now.  Be Ubuntu, just 5 releases ago.04:58
lxleexcept for the fact that there needs to be testing releases and development04:58
keithclarkAll the time, just shifting\04:58
lxlenot much can be done without feedback04:58
lxlei'm not sure what your purpose here is04:58
keithclarkJust idea tossing04:59
keithclarkYou make a great distro btw04:59
lxlenot me, lubuntu team04:59
lxlei'm just hanging out04:59
keithclarkhey, just my thoughts04:59
keithclarkLubuntu/Xubunu....I have a tough time deciding05:00
lxlekick ass linux promo http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=njos57IJf-005:05
keithclarkphillw around?05:08
keithclarkWell I guess my bottom line is that adding that paragraph onto you front page does not instll confidence to use Lubjuntu as you main o/s.05:13
holsteinkeithclark: whats that?05:14
lxlewithout the sticker of approval from canoncial about lubuntu being lts he thinks its inferior05:14
keithclarkNo, this one<:05:14
keithclarkPlease note that Lubuntu 12.04 is not an LTS (5 years support), but a 'standard' release, supported for 18 months. This is simply due the fact there is insufficient 'man-power' to commit to 5 years of support.05:14
holsteinkeithclark: you dont have to use it. you can use ubuntu and add lxde05:15
holsteinkeithclark: the idea is, the team/community doesnt want to commit to supporting lubuntu for 5 years05:15
keithclarkOk, I understand.  Hey, it was just my impression as a user05:15
lxletalk about splitting ends05:15
keithclarkLook like your eyes are new05:16
lxlemy question is of course then, how does canonical know if you called them up, whether your running lubuntu or ubuntu with lxde05:16
lxleseems like symantics to me05:16
holsteinkeithclark: its a very small team that actually puts out a nice polished product that feeds other projects05:16
keithclarkDon't be defensive05:17
keithclarkLook as if your eyes were new05:17
holsteinkeithclark: i'll be as i choose05:17
holsteinkeithclark: im stating facts.. however, i mean it not to be combative05:17
keithclarkOk, take care folks.  I hope I could at least offer an opinion05:17
holsteinkeithclark: you can do more than that05:18
holsteinkeithclark: you can actually join and fix/suggest05:18
keithclark>I am right now05:18
holsteinkeithclark: its an open community.. but to "solve" the situation would take addressing the manpower05:18
lxlenah, complaining is easier :)05:18
keithclarkYes, but don't state it that way upfront.05:18
keithclarkNot a confidence builder05:19
keithclark"Come with us but we might not be arount"05:19
holsteinkeithclark: i dont think the lubuntu project has "build confidence" as a goal05:19
keithclark*around05:19
keithclarkGet the bad idea?05:19
lxlemight not be around?05:19
keithclarkMaybe I shoud restart05:19
lxlelubuntu is about the most consistent lxde distro available05:19
holsteinkeithclark: i dont actually.. i see it like this.. we are a small team that are comfortable providing 18 months support.. not 5 years05:20
lxleand long standing at this point05:20
keithclarkHold on05:20
lxlerest assured they will be around05:20
keithclarkHold on05:20
keithclarkOk, I'm just trying to portray one version of your wording05:20
holsteinkeithclark: the statment is not "we might not be here, use caution".. its just, "we are small, and provide 18 months, not 5 years"05:20
holsteinkeithclark: its not my wording05:20
lxlei think you like being difficult just to be difficult, no rhyme or reason, just wanting to win some arbitrary argument05:20
keithclarkOk, then I shall go, I just thought you would appreciate some feedback.05:21
holsteinkeithclark: there are no versions of it though.. its just a statement to answer the question "why is lubuntu 12.04 not lts"05:21
lxleappreciated05:21
holsteinkeithclark: the #lubuntu-offtopic channel is the unofficial dev channel.. also, try the mailing list05:22
keithclarkIWhy so angry though?05:22
holsteinkeithclark: anger?05:22
lxlewho is angry? when explanations aren't enough, what else can you do?05:22
keithclarkOk, sorry then.  I'm just a user05:22
holsteinkeithclark: i am not angry, i am just reinforcing what i read in that sentence.. which is just what it says05:23
wxlwasn't that a line in tron?05:23
lxlemaybe think about becoming a helper05:23
holsteinkeithclark: i dont see the fear and doubt in it..05:23
lxleme either holstein05:23
holsteinkeithclark: i would like to keep this constructive though, and make sure you can feel like there is no doubt there either05:23
lxlei think he believes that in 18 months everything will stop working or something05:24
wxllots do05:24
wxli don't agree05:24
wxlbut lots do05:24
lxlehmmm weird05:24
holsteinkeithclark: the 12.04 repos will be up.. just, the lubuntu specific things are not supported, or tested, or guaranteed to work by this team05:25
lxlewhat do they think when they are using an xp machine then?05:25
wxlhowever to me lts seems like lip service, really05:25
lxleto me it also seems like, whats the difference, like was said earlier, lubuntu or ubuntu with lxde05:25
holsteinfor me, LTS is just the time the servers are up for the repos.. and the package maintenance by the community in them05:26
lxleuhmmm...... same base code, therego same updates pushed for five years, for the most part05:26
keithclarkHey, I just came here looking for an alternative to Ubuntu.  I've tried Xubuntu and Knoppix.  Knoppix was impressive but wanted to stay more to the Ubuntu family.05:26
wxlwell, lubuntu IS an alternative05:26
keithclarkSo I came along Lu bjntu.  The only concern I had was your disclaimner05:27
wxlproblem solved :)05:27
lxlewhen is the last time you called canonical for support?05:27
wxlit's an issue of semantics05:27
lxleif never then problem solved05:27
wxl↑ good point, lxle !05:27
keithclarkI don't think you get my point here05:27
holsteinkeithclark: i would just try it, and see if it fits your needs.. see first hand if its what you are looking for05:28
wxlsure we do05:28
lxlethe point is moot if the reason is never used05:28
wxlwe've dealt with this time and time again why is why the disclaimer is there :)05:28
holsteinkeithclark: the team will not extend the support of 12.04.. though, if you'd like to ask for another sentence about why its not supported to be there, that might be able to be arranged05:28
wxllet me add to what holstein said05:29
keithclarkThen why claim/disclaim it at all?05:29
wxlthe team will not OFFICIALLY support 12.0405:29
wxldoesn't mean you can't get support05:29
holsteinkeithclark: so users know that 12.04 is not an LTS, like the other flavors05:29
lxleunofficially is a different story, in other words, your good dude, stop sweating it05:29
keithclarkDon't addres it05:29
wxlthe volunteers like us are generally content with helping anyone05:29
keithclarkThis seems to be a major problem with your distro05:30
wxland we do have folks that because of their hardware use 10.0405:30
holsteinkeithclark: its different.. all the other 12.04 flavors are LTS.. actively supported by larger teams and communities.. the fact that lubuntu is not needs to be mentnioned05:30
holsteinkeithclark: its not a problem.. its a difference05:30
keithclarkThen live it05:30
lxlecan you show me another lxde distro that has 5 year support?05:30
keithclarkDon't deny it05:30
wxlwe do live it05:30
wxlwe all use it :)05:30
lxlewould love to see it05:31
keithclarkBe proud, don't deny it.05:31
holsteinkeithclark: i dont think anyone is trying to deny.. its in an effort for information.. so one doesnt assume 12.04 lubuntu is supported for 5 years05:31
* wxl is proud05:31
holsteinkeithclark: ?05:31
keithclarkState that.05:31
holsteinkeithclark: no one is denying anything05:31
lxleif you can find another lxde distro with 5 years support then i'll hear the rest of this pointless argument05:31
holsteinkeithclark: thats what the statement states05:31
keithclarkWhat is with the 5 year support?05:31
keithclarkIgnore that05:31
lxlethats what your upset about05:31
lxlelubuntu not having five year support05:32
keithclarkState what you do support instead05:32
holsteinkeithclark: that is what *all* other 12.04 versions are05:32
holstein!lts05:32
lxlethey did05:32
ubottuLTS means Long Term Support. LTS versions of Ubuntu will be supported for 3 years on the desktop, and 5 years on the server; with the exception of 12.04 (Precise Pangolin), which will be supported for 5 years on the desktop. The current LTS version of Ubuntu is !Precise (Precise Pangolin 12.04)05:32
lxle18 months05:32
holsteinkeithclark: see that output ^^ that is what *all* other 12.04 flavors are05:32
holsteinkeithclark: the statement is framed in this way 'why is lubuntu not lts like the others?'.. which is a valid question, and a reason to mention the 5 years05:33
lxlei'm still waiting for a link to this mysterious lxde distro with years and years of support to surface05:33
keithclarkWell I'll tell you what, if you get this question over and over again.  If you get agitatged by this question over and over again then there is a perception issue thart you need to solve.  It is not us users that is the issue.  We just download and use the o/s, not the philosophy.05:33
lxlein other words, regarless if its only 18months, i bet you can't find another lxde distro that even gives you that much05:33
holsteinkeithclark: it cant be simply ignored, because stating that its supported for 18 months would raise the question "well, not the lts one, not 12.04, right?"05:34
holsteinand that is wrong05:34
holsteinkeithclark: we actually dont05:34
holsteinkeithclark: folks look, and see that the 12.o4 is *not* and lts05:34
holsteinkeithclark: its not that im asking you to subscribe to a philosophy either.. just to understand that there is already an LTS system in place, and lubuntu is not offering that05:35
holsteinkeithclark: if you are new to the ecosystem and community, and the concept of an LTS is new, then that is understandable05:35
keithclarkOk, then I don't get the whole thing.  Fair enough.  I've offerd my views. Take them as you need.05:36
holsteinits uncessarily complex, and actually being actively discussed upstream.. not having an LTS.. or when to do them or why05:36
holsteinbut, here is the fact.. there *is* a 12.04 LTS.. *every* other ubuntu.. but lubuntu is not doing that.. so that must be addressed in the statement you read05:36
lxlefrom what i gather, it will be lts release, with rolliing releases in between05:36
holsteinits not meant to either gain nor influence your "trust"05:37
holsteinits only stating that "unlike the other 12.04 versions, this one is not supported for 5 years, so dont expect that"05:37
keithclarkholstein: no trust is required but that with which I'd trust with my personal information.05:37
lxleits like , the rest of the ubuntu team signed up to work 3 jobs, the lubuntu team was small and could only sign up for 2 jobs consistently, however that doesn't mean that lubuntu won't work part time at the 3rd job :)05:38
holsteinkeithclark: you are not offerering a view though05:38
holsteinkeithclark: you offer a better sentence, and i'll read it05:38
lxlehey keith this is easy05:38
lxlego get another distro05:38
lxlesolved05:38
lxlenow go05:38
holsteinkeithclark: this is an open community.. but, as i said, the 5 years need be mentioned..05:38
keithclarklxle: ok, thanks and have a great night.05:38
lxlewhats the point of saying i can't use this cuz i'm scared, when other options are available05:39
holsteinkeithclark: so, if you have a constructive change to offer, you can offer that here, or in the other channel, or the mailing list05:39
lxleuse what your not scared to use05:39
keithclarkholstein: I thought I did05:39
lxleexplanations have been given05:39
holsteinkeithclark: otherwise, if the issue is just with your "trust".. try the disto, and if it works for you, go for it05:39
lxleenough said05:39
holsteinkeithclark: i didnt see it.. where is your suggestion?05:39
cerebrategentle heartedness @ freenode05:39
lxlethis will take a while05:39
lxlelol05:39
lxleya, i'm not too good at that after about an hour or so of explaining05:40
lxleespecially when its not really tracking down a "problem"05:40
holsteini would like to move this the the #lubuntu-offtopic channel keithclark05:40
keithclarkok, nevermind.  Thanks for the great night.  I've tried to explain my initlial reaction to a paragraph on your website that I found interesting.   If you choose not to use that, then fine.05:41
holsteinkeithclark: use what?05:41
cerebratehes insight perhaps05:42
holsteinkeithclark: we cant use a reaction.. just a suggestion05:42
lxlehe thinks we are going to use complaining about something trivial to change something trivial05:42
keithclarkHoly cow, I was just suggesting05:42
holsteinkeithclark: where?05:42
holsteinkeithclark: i see no sentence05:42
keithclarkOk, never mind.  Have a great evening folks.05:42
holsteinkeithclark: cheers!05:42
lxlethere isn't one constructive idea, only complaints of the lubuntu team not doing what ubuntu is doing, although we explained why and that he is free to use another distro the convo continues05:43
holsteinkeithclark: in the future, use this channel for support only, and /join #lubuntu-offtopic for suggestions05:43
keithclarkIn the future, be more understanding of newer users, their opinions and where they came from.  Understand that they might just want to help and if you don't wnat their help, let them down slowlyl.05:46
wxlkeithclark: i would similarly encourage you to accept that not everyone is going to agree with you05:47
keithclarkI agreed to disagree several times.05:47
wxlso then we're done talking about it, cool.05:47
keithclarkOk, so this help session is recorded>?05:48
wxleverything is recorded :)05:48
holsteinkeithclark: i welcome your help.. please take it to the proper channel.. #lubuntu-offtopic05:48
keithclarkOk, thanks.05:48
holsteinkeithclark: join there and share what sentence you would like to see instead.. but we need a sentence05:48
jaredkeithclark: are you referring to the wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu ?05:49
keithclarkholstein: why so negative?05:49
wxlkeithclark: holstein is encouraging your feedback, so why do you see it as negative?05:49
lxleholstein has been incredibly patient and positive,,05:50
holsteinkeithclark: i am positively, and non-combatively inviting you to the proper channel.. #lubuntu-offtopic ,and i look forward to reading your suggestion05:50
keithclarkI'll join.05:50
jaredI think his main point is the prominence of the information than anything. I updated the front page as it's not even the most currently release anyway.05:56
keithclark#/join lubuntu05:58
holsteinjared: i like it05:58
jaredkeithclark: was the problem only on the wiki page?05:58
holsteinkeithclark: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu was just updated by jared05:58
jaredIf so have a quick look and let me know what you think. If it's elsewhere I can't really help (no access)05:58
jaredholstein: I think he had a fair point, possibly slight language issues prevented understanding.05:59
lxlenot buying that05:59
lxlethere are those that like to argue and won't stop until concession06:00
holsteinjared: i like what you have much better, thanks!06:00
jaredlxle: have a look and see what you think - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu?action=diff&rev2=231&rev1=23006:00
lxlejared thats good06:01
lxlevery good actually06:02
jaredI believe that was essentially the main point the user was suggesting. I didn't read the scrollback line by line but the top and bottom bits.06:02
lxlepublished already?06:02
jaredYeah, if people don't like it they can revert.06:02
jaredI'm just a guy who knows how to write wikis, no special powers here :)06:02
lxlehopefull that will settle some possible fears06:05
lxleand spurn some help06:05
jaredI was never worried, I wouldn't anticipate using any release on my computer for longer than a year or two without update anyway.06:05
jared:D06:06
wxlBUT YOUR SERVER COULD DIE06:06
lxleLOL06:06
jaredI wouldn't be running a GUI on a server either06:06
wxlspeaking of updates, do-release-upgrade is all done, so i'm going to restart06:07
lxlei just realized that synaptic has screwed up my spelling of symantics LOL06:07
jaredAnd my procrastination needs to end, the assignment won't write itself.06:07
wxlwell that was lame06:22
AnalogHi there, can anyone help me please?06:50
wxl!ask06:50
ubottuPlease don't ask to ask a question, simply ask the question (all on ONE line and in the channel, so that others can read and follow it easily). If anyone knows the answer they will most likely reply. :-) See also !patience06:50
AnalogI'm having trouble configuring my monitor resolution, and keeping it permanent.06:50
wxlhow are you doing it?06:50
AnalogI ran a game with WINE, and when it closed, took it down to 1024x7something, when it should be 1360x76806:51
AnalogWelllll.. Can I give you the link I'm using to set it?06:51
Analoghttp://www.sudo-juice.com/change-lxde-screen-resolution-ubuntu-lubuntu/06:51
wxlso you have no problems outside of wine?06:51
AnalogWINE messed it up, and I can't get it back. :(06:51
AnalogAnd the old reso isn't in lxrandr.06:51
AnalogOh, and in the directory the link provides, I know LXDE should be Lubuntu.06:52
wxlhm06:52
AnalogBut before that, I added the new mode in and whatnot... Let me paste the link I used for that info.06:53
Analoghttp://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=198499006:53
AnalogSo, I added the new mode, as such. Then, I followed the instructions on the first link to try and make it permanent, but it's still not working.06:53
wxlso you can get lxrandr to set the resolution?06:54
AnalogI can't...06:54
AnalogIt's not an available option now.06:54
wxlnot permanently06:54
AnalogFreshly rebooted the computer.06:54
wxlbut at all?06:54
wxlcan you just run the command and it works?06:54
AnalogYes, correct. Not permanently, but temporarily, yeah, it was working just fine.06:54
wxlso you've added the command with the @ sign before it to what file?06:54
Analog>_>06:55
Analog To /etc/xdg/lxsession/Lubuntu/autostart06:55
wxlwhich is right06:55
wxlhm06:55
wxlyou do have the @ sign, right? :)06:56
AnalogYes. :)06:56
AnalogI'm quite stumped.06:57
AnalogI'm going to try running the commands in terminal again.06:57
AnalogJust to make sure they keep working.06:57
wxlis this quantal?06:57
AnalogThe latest Lubuntu.06:58
AnalogYes.06:58
AnalogAnd for some reason, the resolution didn't change this time. That's.... Strange.06:58
wxlwell 13.04 is the latest :)06:58
AnalogNone of the commands have been altered or changed in any way.06:58
wxlit's even got an official beta release :)06:58
AnalogOh.06:58
AnalogThen this is Quantal.06:58
wxlindeed that's quite strange06:58
Analog:x06:59
Analog12.10, that is. :P06:59
AnalogShould I go get TeamViewer or something?06:59
wxluh no :)06:59
wxli'm kind of stumped by your issue, really06:59
wxlhowever, i just upgraded to quantal am having my own issues with that file07:00
AnalogBecause at this point I haven't the slightest clue of what to do. It was working.07:00
wxlnot for the same reasons07:00
AnalogWell, I also tried something, that didn't work.07:00
Analog@xrandr --newmode "1360x768_60.00"   84.75  1360 1432 1568 1776  768 771 781 798 -hsync +vsync @xrandr --addmode VGA-1 1360x768_60 @xrandr --output VGA-1 --mode 1360x768_6007:00
AnalogAll those in the autostart.07:01
wxlone thing i might suggest, and this may not work, but it's worth a shot, is to check on the wine channel and see if they have had experience with wine permanently affecting the resolution07:01
AnalogI haven't seen anything there.07:01
AnalogBut I've looked.07:01
wxlthe irc channel07:01
AnalogOh. Is that also freenode?07:01
wxlno :)07:02
wxlactually yes07:02
wxlhttp://www.winehq.org/irc07:03
AnalogOooooh.07:03
AnalogI may just upgrade to the beta, see if that may fix it. >_>07:04
wxlwell you can use the live cd07:04
wxlAnalog: question07:06
AnalogSure.07:06
wxldoes ~/.config/lxsession/Lubuntu/autostart exist on your machine?07:06
AnalogLet me check, one second.07:06
Analog I don't seem to have a .config directory...07:07
Analog>_>07:07
wxlwell that's not htat probelm then07:08
AnalogFound it.07:08
AnalogBut I do see a desktop.conf...07:08
AnalogI don't see autostart there...07:08
wxlok07:08
wxlagain, not that problem07:08
AnalogSo, it's good, then?07:09
AnalogOr should I copy the autostart to that directory as well?07:09
wxlno07:09
wxlyou don't want it07:09
wxli gotta brb07:09
AnalogOh, I don't want that... Okay.07:10
AnalogI wonder if I should delete that directory you gave me. Lx07:11
Analog:x07:11
wxlnope leave it be07:15
AnalogHmmm...07:16
AnalogWelp. I really have no idea what I should do. :x07:18
wxlcheck in with the wine channel07:18
AnalogAlready have.07:18
wxland?07:18
AnalogStill not answer yet, though. :x07:18
wxl!patience07:18
ubottuDon't feel ignored and repeat your question quickly; if nobody knows your answer, nobody will answer you. While you wait, try searching https://help.ubuntu.com or http://ubuntuforums.org or http://askubuntu.com/07:18
wxl:)07:18
* Analog nods.07:18
wxlreplace those urls with the wine ones XD07:19
AnalogICK.07:19
artreihow to build using cmake?07:19
AnalogThis resolution messed up my telnet client, too. :x Poor MUSHclient. :(07:19
wxltelnet07:19
wxlwtf07:19
wxlyou gopher too?07:19
Analog:P07:20
AnalogI play MUDs. :P07:20
wxli gathered that, i was just being silly07:20
AnalogOh. :(07:20
* cerebrate pAt *pat*07:57
cdoublejjhhmm08:07
AnalogHmm.08:28
AnalogMy max screen resolution is 4096x4096...08:28
AnalogMan, that oughta be fun...08:28
=== IboS_ is now known as IboS
tortik How to manually (what files?)remove extra languages from Lubuntu 12.04?10:47
AnalogOkay, so my screen resolution is being weird... May I have some ideas on how to fix this? After everything I've done, I'm quite clueless as to where to turn.11:47
hpuser4466Problem: Pcmanfm won't show .avi files from my video camera.  How to change default filer to rox-filer ??12:26
hpuser4466join #lxde12:27
phillwAnalog: I've just read the scroll back re: your problem, let me do a bit of further digging12:27
phillwAnalog: as you seem to not had a response from wine on irc, may I suggest that you have a look at http://ubuntuforums.org/forumdisplay.php?f=313 and if the question is not addressed in their 'How To / FAQ' section that you ask on there. They are much more used to wine than us guys :) (Do mention that you are using lubuntu by using the 'tag' so that it states lubuntu).12:30
hpuser4466okaay, maybe I should attack this from another angle:12:32
hpuser4466How to I change the default applications?12:32
hpuser4466ie when I plugin an SDCARD i want rox-filer to open. Not pcmanfm.12:33
hpuser4466pcmanfm has a grip on my pc like a virus.  A virus i want to remove.12:41
hpuser4466for some reason pcmanfm won't show files. But i can see them in terminal.12:42
hpuser4466looks like pcmanfm is coded into the system.12:43
hpuser4466I found something in panel settings > advanced >  File manager.12:50
hpuser4466logging out.12:50
Mortzhey13:04
cerebratehey, g'day13:29
cerebratewelcome to our channel13:30
=== chalced is now known as chalcedony
lammah23:00
lamma#lubuntu23:01
lammaanyone here23:01
phillwadhd?23:02
abhort42Hello all23:48
phillw!ask | abhort4223:51
ubottuabhort42: Please don't ask to ask a question, simply ask the question (all on ONE line and in the channel, so that others can read and follow it easily). If anyone knows the answer they will most likely reply. :-) See also !patience23:51
phillwabhort42: if you'd just like to have a chat, please join #lubuntu-offtopic23:53

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!