=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
=== wedgwood_away is now known as wedgwood | ||
=== wedgwood is now known as wedgwood_away | ||
=== Whoopie_ is now known as Whoopie | ||
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
=== jacky- is now known as jacky | ||
infinity | pitti: The new udev-udeb has a non-udeb dependency (libacl1). | 08:44 |
---|---|---|
infinity | pitti: Either need to build it in a way to drop that dep, or we need a libacl-udeb. | 08:45 |
=== tkamppeter_ is now known as tkamppeter | ||
infinity | pitti: unping, re: udev/acl. Uploaded a fix. | 10:21 |
=== sgnb` is now known as sgnb | ||
chrisccoulson | infinity, chromium finished building on arm overnight \o/ | 12:07 |
chrisccoulson | (i'll try to run it later) | 12:08 |
infinity | chrisccoulson: Oh, that's good news. I just finished force-hinting the broken stack into raring, so udev/systemd could migrate, but an upload that actually builds would be FAR better. :P | 12:15 |
ogra_ | chrisccoulson, ! | 12:19 |
infinity | ogra_: Don't get your hopes up, it still might not run. :P | 12:20 |
ogra_ | yeah | 12:20 |
ogra_ | but its at least one step forward | 12:20 |
ogra_ | i still dont get why though ... given that chromeos/chrome runs just fine so it *must* be possiblle to get it working | 12:21 |
infinity | There seems to be some serious left-hand/right-hand lack of communication there. | 12:21 |
ogra_ | yes | 12:22 |
infinity | I don't know if jbailey still works on that, but I should talk to him about WTF is up. | 12:22 |
infinity | Though, that mostly just accounts for failures to build (the right/left thing). | 12:22 |
infinity | The failures to RUN could be v8 having bugs with armhf register usage, etc. | 12:22 |
ogra_ | qwell, and there are Keybuk and kees too | 12:22 |
infinity | Unless ChromOS is now armhf too? | 12:22 |
ogra_ | it is | 12:23 |
infinity | Ahh, so even fewer excuses now. Lovely. | 12:23 |
ogra_ | i'm using their flash plugin in my ubuntu chromium all day here | 12:23 |
ogra_ | and i can run the whhole chromeos desktop in a window under unity too :) | 12:23 |
ogra_ | by just firing it up from /opt | 12:24 |
ogra_ | not that unity would be very useful (doesnt get along with mali drivers to use HW accel it seem ... everything else does though) or that chromeos in a window would | 12:25 |
ogra_ | but for laughs and testing it is fine :) | 12:26 |
jtaylor | slangasek: you m-a'ed tcl recently, will you also do tk for raring? | 12:50 |
infinity | jtaylor: That was xnox, actually. | 12:54 |
infinity | Or maybe wookey, sponsored by xnox, looking at the changelog. | 12:55 |
xnox | that. | 12:56 |
xnox | i guess everyone is pieced off about it, so i should multiarch tk & ship compat shell config script. | 12:56 |
jtaylor | having tk and tcl in the same state would be good | 12:57 |
infinity | There needs to be a compat script? What broke? | 12:57 |
jtaylor | as they are kind of related | 12:57 |
jtaylor | just a bad configure check in a science package | 12:57 |
xnox | infinity: TkConfig.sh script moved from /usr/lib/ to /usr/lib/$(multiarch) | 12:57 |
xnox | (and tcl) | 12:58 |
jtaylor | my concern is just if I fixx it for tcl now, do I need to revisit it for tk in a few days? | 12:58 |
infinity | Oh. That's arch-specific? :/ | 12:58 |
xnox | infinity: but those config scripts can totally be dpkg-architecture & call the right script. | 12:58 |
xnox | not to break stuff that expects that config script to be there. | 12:59 |
infinity | Yeahp, that would work. | 12:59 |
xnox | jtaylor: well, you can totally test for tk m-a, and try that, if not try normal one, and then bail. | 12:59 |
jtaylor | thats what the bad configure dos | 13:00 |
infinity | I'm not sure there's any value in patching upstream sources to look for the M-A config script at all, if you're going to put the compat one in. | 13:01 |
jtaylor | a enormous list of possible locations it checks :) | 13:01 |
jtaylor | instead of just doing a try link | 13:01 |
* infinity gets the kernels and d-i to migrate and calls it a night. | 13:01 | |
jtaylor | the simplest fix for thix package is just add --with-tcl-library=/usr/lib/$(DEB_HOST_ARCH) | 13:02 |
jtaylor | but do I need to do that for tk too in a few days or not? | 13:02 |
infinity | DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH even. | 13:02 |
jtaylor | yes | 13:02 |
infinity | But if xnox adds the compat scripts, you don't need to change anything. | 13:03 |
infinity | And it'll all just work again. | 13:03 |
infinity | Which seems like a whole lot less effort. :P | 13:03 |
jtaylor | the configure does not sue the script | 13:03 |
infinity | Oh. | 13:03 |
infinity | It's looking for the .so? | 13:03 |
jtaylor | yes | 13:03 |
infinity | People who do that should be shot. | 13:03 |
infinity | I'd switch to either the config script or a try link and forward it upstream, instead of adding to the brain damage. | 13:04 |
jtaylor | the funny thing is they do that too | 13:05 |
jtaylor | but only after checking for the so in the hardcoded locations | 13:05 |
jtaylor | very weird :) | 13:05 |
infinity | So, you could just delete the .so checks? | 13:05 |
infinity | Also very valid. | 13:05 |
infinity | The only argument for .so checks is if you're dlopening a hardcoded path. Which is, in itself, wrong. | 13:06 |
infinity | At least, it's wrong if the library is on the search path, since this isn't 1975, and dlopen() is smart. | 13:06 |
jtaylor | afk 15 min | 13:07 |
cjwatson | jtaylor: I'm in the process of multiarching it - was working on it end of last week | 13:24 |
jtaylor | k so it will be done, thanks thats all I wanted to know | 13:24 |
cjwatson | because it's just madness for one of tcl and tk to be multiarched and the other noe.t | 13:24 |
cjwatson | *not | 13:24 |
jtaylor | yes I though too | 13:25 |
cjwatson | If anyone's really desperate, my current work is http://paste.ubuntu.com/5619256/ | 13:25 |
cjwatson | But I plan to get that uploaded early next week once I've prepared corresponding tcltk-defaults changes and done some testing with the ruby1.8 build | 13:25 |
guest16950 | hello | 17:09 |
guest16950 | question: | 17:09 |
guest16950 | ubuntu XX.04 usually gets released at the end of april | 17:09 |
guest16950 | but windows xp support will end at 8th of april 2014 (beginning of april) | 17:10 |
guest16950 | are you planning to release ubuntu 14.04 prior or on the the 8th of april ;p? | 17:10 |
guest16950 | probably would be a good move, wouldn't it ;)? | 17:11 |
guest16950 | just saying | 17:11 |
ScottK | guest16950: The release date was set almost half a year ago. It's a bit late to change it now. | 17:14 |
ogra_ | ScottK, really ?ho set it ? | 17:23 |
ogra_ | *who even | 17:23 |
* ogra_ wasnt aware we had a 14.04 date | 17:23 | |
ScottK | ogra_: Oh. Sorry, I misread his comment. | 17:23 |
ogra_ | :) | 17:23 |
* ScottK was thinking 13.04. | 17:24 | |
ogra_ | yeah, me too first, i had to read twice | 17:24 |
ScottK | OTOH, 10.10.10 was so annoying, I'm sure I don't want to release at the start of the month. | 17:26 |
ogra_ | well, depends what the TB decides ... if there is actually a six month cycle before yeah ... | 17:27 |
ogra_ | in a rolling model two weeks dont really hurt | 17:27 |
guest16950 | just imagine how many users still are using windows xp ;) | 17:32 |
guest16950 | and on the 8th of april 2014 they have to look for a new os | 17:32 |
guest16950 | because ms won't provide any updates to xp any longer from that date on ;) | 17:33 |
guest16950 | (according to the current plan) | 17:33 |
guest16950 | having 14.04 ready until or on that date sounds like a good idea to me ;) | 17:33 |
guest16950 | btw: i really hope the following bug: | 17:35 |
guest16950 | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/578045 | 17:35 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 578045 in software-center (Ubuntu) "Upgrading packaged Ubuntu application unreasonably involves upgrading entire OS" [High,In progress] | 17:35 |
guest16950 | will be fixed until then ;) | 17:35 |
ScottK | ogra_: I hope the discussion at the TB will coalesce around Mark's latest proposal. It seemed generally reasonable to me. | 17:44 |
ogra_ | well, i dont know how much rick wants to still push his proposal ... so we'll see | 17:44 |
ogra_ | but yeah, marks is definitely sensible | 17:45 |
slangasek | jtaylor: no, I didn't :) | 17:52 |
jtaylor | slangasek: found the "culprit" already | 17:53 |
jtaylor | but you are wookey on oftc or? | 17:53 |
ScottK | jtaylor: He's vorlon on oftc. | 18:00 |
jtaylor | oh | 18:01 |
jtaylor | sorry, mixed that up | 18:01 |
slangasek | yes, wookey is wookey everywhere | 18:01 |
penguin42 | it's the only name he has | 18:16 |
jcastro | If there's a backport request that deals with a major bug in a package with a fix I need to ping .... ? | 18:25 |
jcastro | can someone fill in the blank for me? | 18:25 |
ScottK | jcastro: With a package that's already been backported? | 18:27 |
jcastro | I don't think it's been backported yet | 18:27 |
ScottK | jcastro: It kind of depends on the specifics. | 18:27 |
jcastro | https://bugs.launchpad.net/precise-backports/+bug/1095056 | 18:27 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1095056 in Quantal Backports "Please backport rkhunter 1.4.0-2 (universe) from raring" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 18:27 |
jcastro | is the bug in question | 18:27 |
jcastro | someone pinged me about it, seems like there's a fix available, I just need to know what the next step is | 18:28 |
jcastro | getting people to test the backport? | 18:28 |
ScottK | Someone needs to test unhide and unhide.rb with it. | 18:29 |
ScottK | If those work, then it can be backported. Feel free to ping me and I'll do it if no one else is around. Laney or micahg could too. | 18:30 |
jcastro | ok, I'll get the guy to post his findings on the bug | 18:30 |
jcastro | thanks! | 18:30 |
ScottK | You're welcome. | 18:31 |
=== jtechidna is now known as JontheEchidna | ||
=== Ursinha_ is now known as Ursinha |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!