[07:26] <ppisati> moin
[08:48]  * apw waves ...
[08:54] <ppisati> apw: moin
[08:56] <smb> moin
[08:57] <apw> ppisati, moin
[09:02] <ppisati> brb
[09:51] <czajkowski> would anyone be able to share any light on why I do an update on Raring, it's breaking my virtual Box so I have to kick it each time via http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/5624797/
[10:06] <smb> czajkowski, It looks like whatever vboxdrv does, it has broken or got out of sync with DKMS. Maybe if you re-create the initrd you get around it for now, but likely the next kernel update with a newer abi number breaks it again.
[10:08] <czajkowski> smb: yup as soon as update the setup each time I cna get the virtual box up and running, just kinda annoying 
[10:09] <czajkowski> as I left it wrking on Friday, do an update this morning and it's broken 
[10:13] <smb> Primarily it should be dkms that re-compiles the kernel modules because that is triggered automatically when a new kernel is installed and also should update the initrd. So when dkms got broken in some way the experience won't be nice. But I do not use virtualbox that much, so I don't know the latest status there or how any scripts have changed.
[10:13] <czajkowski> smb: cheers
[11:51] <tjaalton> hey, we need 20afbda209d708 from upstream to fix a regression with the i915 driver on stable series
[11:51] <tjaalton> bug 1156310 and friends
[11:51] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1156310 in xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) "xrandr detects too many displays" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1156310
[12:01] <lool> happy to test a kernel for LP #1156310
[12:01] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1156310 in xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) "xrandr detects too many displays" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1156310
[12:01] <tjaalton> I could build one
[12:02] <lool> happy if you do  :-)
[12:02] <lool> I have a workaround
[12:02] <lool> just trying to speed up the inclusion of the speed in any way I can
[12:06] <tjaalton> huh, doesn't apply as-is
=== mitya57_ is now known as mitya57
[14:08] <apw> tjaalton, isn't that one in stable now ?
[14:09] <tjaalton> apw: let me check
[14:11] <tjaalton> apw: I don't see it there?
[14:16] <apw> tjaalton, i thought it saw it in 3.8.3 ... hmm
[14:21] <tjaalton> no that's 52d7eceda which then needs this additional commit or gen4 is busted :)
[14:40]  * ogasawara back in 20
[14:50] <tjaalton> lool: ok, kernel built and available at http://people.canonical.com/~tjaalton/lool
[14:50] <tjaalton> hope you have amd64 installed
[14:57] <tjaalton> can't reproduce the problem on my old laptop
[15:04] <tjaalton> lool: new link http://people.canonical.com/~tjaalton/lp1156310
[15:19] <rsalveti> ogasawara: guess we need to mark https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/foundations-1303-phablet-kernel-maintenance to a series
[15:19] <rsalveti> the work would land for s-series, so I guess it should be fine to target to that
[15:19] <rsalveti> and let the milestone to the one it's already assigned
[15:20] <ogasawara> rsalveti: ack, will do
[15:20] <rsalveti> things are kind of under discussion atm, as the series x milestone usage is still not clear for the touch based work items
[15:20] <rsalveti> but guess that for it to show at status it needs at least a valid series
[15:20] <rsalveti> ogasawara: cool, thanks
[15:24] <rtg_> tjaalton, re: bug #1156310. Daniel Vetter is suggesting to revert a couple of 3.8.3 stable patches. Are they the root of lool's problems ?
[15:24] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1156310 in xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) "xrandr detects too many displays" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1156310
[15:25] <rtg_> tjaalton, https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/18/180
[15:25] <lool> tjaalton: just grabbed installed your kernels will reboot in a minute
[15:25] <lool> unless you tell me otherwise  :)
[15:25] <tjaalton> yeah reverting makes sense
[15:26] <rtg_> tjaalton, ok, I'll push that out and upload today.
[15:29] <tjaalton> there's also 202adf4b9f5957 to fix bug 1135668
[15:29] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1135668 in xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) "Intel graphics fails when bringing monitor out of sleep" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1135668
[15:29] <rtg_> tjaalton, is that a different bug ?
[15:29] <tjaalton> yes
[15:30] <tjaalton> just wondering if you could add that there :)
[15:30] <rtg_> tjaalton, I mean, is that bug the result of these 2 patches ?
[15:30] <tjaalton> no, older, fixed in 3.9rc now
[15:30] <tjaalton> feel free to add it after the revert & upload
[15:30] <tjaalton> no rush
[15:30] <rtg_> tjaalton, ack
[15:31] <tjaalton> another one, 21ad833075801a7 should fix bug 1116587
[15:31] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1116587 in linux (Ubuntu) "Lenovo T400: With external monitor the system is rarely working for more than 10 minutes" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1116587
[15:31] <rtg_> tjaalton, you're just full of patches today :)
[15:31] <tjaalton> nah, just sick of my todo-list :)
[15:33] <tjaalton> as it looks we're doing raring these became a bit more important
[15:33] <rtg_> it certainly does look like we're doing raring
[15:34] <tjaalton> right..
[15:42] <lool> tjaalton: Your kernel fixes the bug for me
[15:43] <lool> tjaalton: xrandr output now correct and lightdm showing up in native res again
[15:43] <lool> rtg_: ^
[15:43] <rtg_> lool, ack
[15:44] <tjaalton> lool: thanks for testing, but we'll revert the patches anyway
[15:45] <lool> tjaalton: BTW system crashed this morning with Ubuntu -13; seemed to be possibly related to graphics
[15:45] <lool> as in, system hung after some heavy browser rendering
[15:45] <lool> didn't happen in months
[15:46] <tjaalton> could be the same
[15:47] <tjaalton> try to break it with the updated kernel
[15:59] <rtg_> tjaalton, any other goodies on your todo list  ?
[16:01] <tjaalton> heh, not yet
[16:01] <tjaalton> I'll ask ickle
[16:10] <rtg_> jsalisbury, I think bug #1156548 is likely a duplicate of bug #1156310 (which appears to cause multiple issues)
[16:10] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1156548 in linux (Ubuntu) "With Kernel 3.8.0-13 Intel GPU/screen size not recognized, works correctly with old 3.8.0-12" [Critical,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1156548
[16:10] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1156310 in linux (Ubuntu Raring) "xrandr detects too many displays" [Medium,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1156310
[16:11] <jsalisbury> rtg_, ack.  I'll request the test kernel in bug 1156310 to be testing in 1156548
[16:11] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1156310 in linux (Ubuntu Raring) "xrandr detects too many displays" [Medium,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1156310
[16:11] <jsalisbury> rtg_, thanks
[16:14] <rtg_> jsalisbury, how about building raring master-next (HEAD==874b4285c51a2a77486f0556d513fee52a2587db) and have bug reporters test that ?
[16:14] <jsalisbury> rtg_, even better.  I'll do that.
[16:24] <jsalisbury> rtg_, I forget, which repo has the master-next branch?  It doesn't seem to be in git://kernel.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ubuntu-raring.git
[16:24] <rtg_> jsalisbury, 'git branch -a'
[16:24] <jsalisbury> rtg_, I only see:
[16:24] <jsalisbury> jsalisbury@gomeisa:~/bugs/lp1156548/ubuntu-raring$ git branch -a
[16:24] <jsalisbury> * master
[16:24] <jsalisbury>   remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/master
[16:24] <jsalisbury>   remotes/origin/master
[16:25] <infinity> ikepanhc: Do I get an upload for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-armadaxp/+bug/1153649 ?
[16:25] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1153649 in linux-armadaxp "linux-armadaxp: <version to be filled> -proposed tracker" [Medium,In progress]
[16:25] <rtg_> jsalisbury, re-fetch, e.g., git fetch git://kernel.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ubuntu-raring.git
[16:26] <infinity> zequence / apw: lowlatency for quantal is behind too.
[16:26] <jsalisbury> rtg_, Still don't see it.  Let me try on tangerine
[16:26] <apw> infinity, hmmm that might be my fault i guess
[16:26] <apw> infinity, or has it been rev'd
[16:26] <apw> in the last few days
[16:27] <infinity> apw: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-lowlatency/+bug/1153652
[16:27] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1153652 in kernel-sru-workflow "linux-lowlatency: 3.5.0-26.27 -proposed tracker" [Medium,In progress]
[16:27] <infinity> apw: That's not been a few days, no... But the bug's stalled on prepare-package.  I assume it never landed in the PPA?
[16:27] <ikepanhc> infinity: no, I dont think we shall upload it before we find out the root cause for regression descript in bug 1133586
[16:27] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1133586 in linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu Quantal) "linux-armadaxp: 3.5.0-1610.14 -proposed tracker" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1133586
[16:27] <apw> infinity, ok will poke 
[16:28] <jsalisbury> rtg_, hmm.  I clone my tree with: git clone --reference /usr3/ubuntu/ubuntu-raring.git/ /usr3/ubuntu/ubuntu-raring.git/ ubuntu-raring  
[16:29] <ikepanhc> infinity: find out the update https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-armadaxp/+bug/1133586/comments/14
[16:29] <infinity> ikepanhc: That looks like bad hardware, not a regression.
[16:29] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1133586 in linux-armadaxp "linux-armadaxp: 3.5.0-1610.14 -proposed tracker" [Medium,In progress]
[16:29] <jsalisbury> rtg_, maybe I need to clone a different way
[16:29] <rtg_> jsalisbury, yeah, wrong origin
[16:29] <ikepanhc> infinity: yes, agree, will upload soon
[16:29] <rtg_> jsalisbury, git clone --reference /usr3/ubuntu/ubuntu-raring.git git://kernel.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ubuntu-rearing.git
[16:29] <jsalisbury> rtg_, great.  thanks!
[16:29] <rtg_> except you gatta spell it right
[16:30] <jsalisbury> heh
[16:30] <zequence> apw: Seems like I forgot to update the bug description after updating the package. It's in ppa:ubuntustudio-kernel/linux-lowlatency-sru
[16:31] <jsalisbury> rtg_, that did the trick.  thanks!
[16:31] <rtg_> jsalisbury, np
[16:33] <apw> zequence, thanks will check
[16:46] <infinity> jjohansen: Any progress on 1145234?
[16:47] <jjohansen> infinity: progress yes I think so, but I'm not done with it
[16:48] <jjohansen> infinity: the backport was good, unfortunately, its some of the logic in between that is missing
[16:48] <infinity> jjohansen: Mmkay.  Well, I guess I don't have to feel bad that your security update is being held up by your bug. ;)
[16:48] <jjohansen> yeah no one to blame but me
[17:25]  * rtg_ -> lunch
=== rsalveti_ is now known as rsalveti
[20:13]  * rtg_ -> EOD
=== rsalveti_ is now known as rsalveti