[00:49] is there a PPA or some other low-hassle method to get kernel 3.2 on 10.04? [00:49] I need it for driver reasons [02:13] any way I can move /lib to its own partition post-install? [02:15] /tmp /usr /boot /var and /home are all on their own partitions.. [02:16] I just forgot /var [02:16] derr.. I mean /lib [03:46] hey guys [03:46] im trying to setup multi nic cards on my box [03:46] and my issue is , I cant get the default route to stay added [03:46] I understand you can not have 2 default routes on the same gateway [03:46] sorry subnet * [03:47] and to me It doesnt make sense , you cant have 2 default gateways, But When the 1 NIC fails, how can I have the second nic take over like it should.. [03:54] ? [03:54] anyone? [03:54] home? [03:55] you have to do one of a number of things to make it work [03:55] you either have to set metrics so one route is always preferred [03:56] or configure the kernel to recognize which interface traffic is coming from, and send it back out that way [03:56] or configure load balancing [03:56] I don't have time to go into the details of how to do those things, but hopefully that will set you in the right direction [03:58] without doing one of the above, having more than one default gateway will not work correctly [03:58] tdotr6, ^ [04:02] Hello, I am having problem with updates: linux-image-server depends on linux-image-3.2.0-37-generic; however: Package linux-image-3.2.0-37-generic is not installed. Would appreciate if anybody could help, here is my session dump: http://pastebin.com/dFpvBVFb [04:07] mistigi: Do sudo apt-get dist-upgrade [04:08] k, let me try that [04:09] same issue: root@system:/boot# sudo apt-get dist-upgrade [04:09] Reading package lists... Done [04:09] Building dependency tree [04:09] Reading state information... Done [04:09] You might want to run 'apt-get -f install' to correct these. [04:09] The following packages have unmet dependencies: [04:09] linux-image-server : Depends: linux-image-3.2.0-37-generic but it is not installed [04:09] linux-server : Depends: linux-headers-server (= 3.2.0.37.44) but 3.2.0.39.47 is installed [04:09] E: Unmet dependencies. Try using -f. [04:10] oh, let me try that with -f, one moment [04:22] its pretty much the same, it forced some packages to upgrade and kernel too, from .38 to .39, after reboot kernel is on .39. But still any apt operation complains " linux-server depends on linux-image-server (= 3.2.0.37.44); however: Package linux-image-server is not configured yet." [04:23] "linux-image-server depends on linux-image-3.2.0-37-generic; however: Package linux-image-3.2.0-37-generic is not installed." [04:28] The correct version is published: linux-image-server | 3.2.0.39.47 | precise-updates | amd64, i386 [04:30] Next I'd try, sudo apt-get -f install linux-image-server [04:30] k, one sec [04:32] sudo apt-get -f install linux-image-server ... "The following packages have unmet dependencies: linux-server : Depends: linux-image-server (= 3.2.0.37.44) but 3.2.0.39.47 is to be installed Depends: linux-headers-server (= 3.2.0.37.44) but 3.2.0.39.47 is to be installed" [04:33] Try sudo apt-get -f install linux-image-server linux-headers-server [04:33] Actually, run sudo apt-get update first. [04:33] k [04:33] I just installed this kernel off the US mirror and it's there. [04:33] (at least for i386) [04:36] still same error, like apt is stuck on .37 though I am running .39 "The following packages have unmet dependencies: linux-server : Depends: linux-image-server (= 3.2.0.37.44) but 3.2.0.39.47 is to be installed Depends: linux-headers-server (= 3.2.0.37.44) but 3.2.0.39.47 is to be installed" [04:37] would it make sense to copy /etc/apt/sources.list from another machine running .39 ? [04:38] No. It does appear that you've got the right entries. [04:43] mistigi: Try this and pastebin what you get: grep linux-server /var/lib/apt/lists/* [04:43] k [04:44] http://pastebin.com/PiQhfwut [04:47] Try taking the i386 entries out of your sources.list, apt-get update, and try again. [04:47] k [04:49] You can see you've got the correct version in your Packages files, so I am wondering if things are somehow confused due to multi-arch. [04:49] (it's a guess) [04:49] hmm, all 386 are commented out already in sources.list [04:50] They were being checked in your first pastebin. [04:50] Check isn sources.list.d too. [04:50] k [04:52] By comparison to your output, here's what mine (for an i386 server) shows: http://paste.ubuntu.com/5627289/ [04:54] I see what you mean about 386 being check out, but I do not see them anywhere under /etc/apt [04:55] OK. [04:56] Here's what I'd do then ... [04:56] wget https://launchpad.net/~canonical-kernel-team/+archive/ppa/+build/4332112/+files/linux-server_3.2.0.39.47_amd64.deb [04:56] sudo dpkg -i linux-server_3.2.0.39.47_amd64.deb [04:56] sudo apt-get -f install [04:56] k, let me try that [04:57] It's kind of doing it the hard way, but I don't see why you aren't gettting the new one. [04:59] same error: http://pastebin.com/7n2btqpL [05:00] Progress. Not quite the same error. [05:01] Do the same thing with https://launchpad.net/~canonical-kernel-team/+archive/ppa/+build/4332112/+files/linux-image-server_3.2.0.39.47_amd64.deb [05:04] right, that did not display any errors, one sec [05:05] wow, it looks like it worked :-) Really appreciate your help :-) === mikehale__ is now known as mikehale [05:08] Except I was giving you the wrong version. Crap. [05:08] Somehow I ended up on the kernel team PPA. [05:09] its a VM, i have a snapshot I can rollback to [05:09] Acutally, it's fine. [05:09] k [05:09] I forgot the kernel updates are all built in a special PPA for testing. [05:09] So those are actually the right ones. [05:10] sweet, thanks for your time, really apreciate it :-) Saves me a lot of effort so I do not have to rebuild this box from scratch [05:25] What is the best option for quickly building new test servers for either home setup or a test env, have been looking at Cobbler or considering fog for images? [05:25] I would also like to build both Ubuntu servers and CentOS [06:50] How has your guys' luck with Ubuntu MaaS been? [07:59] jamespage: swift milestone-proposed branch cut [08:03] ttx, marvellous - thanks! [08:03] jamespage: in the process of tagging 1.8.0-rc1 [09:09] hey there === security is now known as fire === smb` is now known as smb [09:40] I followed ubuntu's practice of putting the images under /var/lib/libvirt/images//ubuntu-kvm/*.qcow2 - is there any suggested practice about snapshots (i.e., where to place them on the host filesystem)? [09:48] * RoyK wonders what sort of genius that came up with moving to a new kernel release at 12.04.2 [09:53] the policy of supporting new HW with newer point releases [09:54] (complain in #ubuntu-kernel instead of -server though) === phretor_ is now known as phretor [10:12] koolhead17: o/ [10:13] alex88: my friend. howdy/ [10:14] just configured some new servers for mysql and storage, finally with hw raid, it flies :) you? [10:19] btw, why I need to install a package to set as manually installed? === island219_ is now known as island219 [10:33] is there a way to set a package as installed from source in apt-get? === phretor_ is now known as phretor [10:34] hi, anyone here using qemu-kvm with libvirt on raring who is still able to live migrate with virsh? I can't do so after upgrading two hosts for testing, trying to work out if it is a bug or me [10:38] alex88: no [10:38] ikonia: just found https://help.ubuntu.com/community/CheckInstall [10:40] alex88: I very strongly advise against that [10:40] but of course it's up to you [10:40] ikonia: usually generated problems? [10:40] no, I just feel the whole process is bad [10:40] but it's a personal opinion [10:40] it's a sloppy package basically [10:41] smb: Do you have that xen dsc/debdiff? [10:42] mardraum: Hmm, yeah it should still work.. What are you seeing? [10:42] Daviey, if that means the one between 4.2.0 and 4.2.1... maybe not yet but simple to create [10:42] smb: raring current, to what you are proposing :) [10:43] alex88: what source is it? [10:45] Daviey, its now where the src pkg is [10:45] smb: thaks [10:46] Daviey: I get "error: operation failed: migration job: unexpectedly failed" from something like "virsh migrate --live --verbose somevm qemu+ssh://somehost/system" - nfs shared storage, openvswitch networking [10:46] dns is still ok, same as it was before upgrade, forward and reverse ok for both hosts [10:48] mardraum: Ah, i haven't played with shared storage migration as much.. In a few hours, hallyn will be around.. he will be a much better person to help work this out. [10:48] Daviey: cheers [10:51] Daviey: vips (package is libvips-tools) [11:06] I should do the same also for libtiff since I need 4.0.3 on ubuntu 12.04 [11:06] and that version is just on ubuntu 12.10 [11:06] maybe I'll just install its dev [11:06] maybe I'll just install its deb [11:07] alex88: if that doesn't work (quite likely), grabbing the source package from a newer release.. and rebuilding it for 12.04 is better [11:07] alex88: out of interest, what is it you need a later version for? [11:07] Daviey: bigtiff support [11:07] files more then 4gb [11:07] ah [11:08] btw, I need the dev package [11:09] Daviey: http://packages.ubuntu.com/quantal/libtiff5-dev this is what I need to install, can you advice me how to do that? [11:09] 'apt-get install libtiff5-dev' [11:10] Jeeves_: I'm not on 12.10 [11:10] I'm on 12.04 [11:11] alex88: I'm sorry, but this is going to take longer than I have time to spare right now. [11:11] Daviey: oh sure, no worries [11:21] w [11:21] oops [11:29] the problem is that installing from source installs both libtiff4 and libtiff4-dev pacakges [11:29] I mean, the same contents of both [11:32] exactly what do you mean, installing from source? [11:33] patdk-lap: downloading source package from authors site, ./configure, make, make install [11:33] well, that wasn't the right way to do it [11:33] mmhh no? [11:34] not if you ever planned to uninstall it or needed to fix your system [11:34] patdk-lap: well, I'm using checkinstall [11:34] instead of make isntall [11:34] *install [11:36] you should have downloaded the source from 12.10 [11:36] done a dpkg-buildpackage [11:36] then installed the .deb [11:37] patdk-lap: from where? http://packages.ubuntu.com/quantal/libtiff5-dev -> [tiff_4.0.2-1ubuntu2.1.debian.tar.gz] ? [11:37] yes. atleast 3 files are needed [11:37] the debian.tar.gz, the source(.tar.gz?) and the .dsc [11:38] ok so all o fhtem [11:38] *of them [11:38] but if you did a make *install* [11:38] not sure what it did to your system [11:38] and how hard it will be to put it back to normal [11:39] patdk-lap: I didn't, just checkinstall, then dpkg -r [11:39] and it's now clean [11:39] since no traces of libtiff in /usr/lib [11:39] you shouldn't ever :) [11:40] patdk-lap: btw, it's still clean now, also, what should I do with those 3 files? [11:40] even when it is installed, there will be no traces of it there (except maybe if you use i386?) [11:40] dpkg-source -x [11:40] patdk-lap: it's not installed, no files, no packages installed [11:41] find /usr -name 'libtiff*' [11:41] just in /usr/local/src that's where I'm working on [11:41] ok [11:42] btw, did dpkg-source -x tiff_4.0.2-1ubuntu2.1.dsc [11:42] extracted, unpacked, applied patches and so on [11:42] go into that folder [11:42] done [11:42] apt-get build-dep libtiff4 [11:43] patdk-lap: version 4.0.2 from quantal is libtiff5, should I apt-get build-dep libtiff5? [11:43] is there a libtiff5 in your os version? [11:43] libtiff4 is version 3.9.2 from precise, libtiff5 is this one 4.0.2 from quantal [11:43] nope [11:43] then it won't work [11:43] use libtiff4 [11:43] as build-dep right? [11:43] yes [11:44] your just installing what it needs to build [11:44] the differences between libtiff4 and libtiff5 are normally nothing [11:44] btw [11:44] Picking 'tiff' as source package instead of 'libtiff4' [11:44] E: Unable to find a source package for tiff [11:44] btw, ./configure already works [11:44] since I've already installed packages [11:44] who said to use ./configure? [11:44] (i think it works, it does for the 4.0.3 I manually downloaded) [11:44] now it's probably messed up and need to delete that folder and do dpkg-source again [11:45] ok [11:45] nope, haven't run it here [11:45] just said that it worked for the other source I downloaded by hand [11:45] dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc [11:45] k, trying [11:45] dpkg-checkbuilddeps: Unmet build dependencies: cdbs (>= 0.4.106~) libxmu-dev libglu1-mesa-dev freeglut3-dev libxi-dev libjbig-dev [11:45] ok, trying to install those [11:46] damn, libjbig-dev is not there on 12.04, just libjbig2dec0-dev [11:46] same thing [11:47] or maybe [11:47] just give it a try [11:48] try? I get http://pastie.org/pastes/6625376/text [11:48] btw, I've installed all the other packages [11:48] heh? [11:49] patdk-lap: I get that running dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc [11:49] it says that libjbig-dev is missing [11:51] maybe I need to do the same thing for libjbig-dev? [11:51] build from source? [11:52] as it just depends on libjbig0 which just needs libc6 so not that many dependencies to go trough [11:53] ya, looks like you need that [11:53] the one in precise is 0.11 vs 2.0 [11:54] though it seems to compile with it, it's probably going have bugs [11:54] what? libc6? [11:54] and you will need to edit cdbs to say 0.4.100 [11:54] libjbig-dev [11:55] edit debian/control [11:55] ok, let me try to build libjbig first [11:55] I've already downloaded source [11:55] doing dpkg-source -x jbigkit_2.0-2ubuntu1.dsc [11:55] now dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc [11:56] ya [11:56] good, I've the debs (party) [11:56] now install jbigkit debs [11:56] yes [11:56] I have a question about munin can it be used that the munin and munin-node is installed on the same server? and what is munin-node anyway? [11:56] dpkg -i *.deb [11:56] done, now back to tiff [11:57] ok, just dpkg-checkbuilddeps: Unmet build dependencies: cdbs (>= 0.4.106~) [11:57] I said you needed to edit that [11:57] sure, going to do that now (was just to do step by step) [11:58] k, I'll set 0.4.100~ as version [11:58] since precise has that [11:58] ok building [11:59] there we go.. I've the deb :) [11:59] all debs installed, great! [12:00] thanks patdk-lap! [12:00] thanks alot! [12:00] now to see if things will, just use it [12:00] or if they need to be recompiled based on that new version [12:00] patdk-lap: well, vips now says tiff is installed correctly [12:01] the problem is that libmagick++-dev installs libtiff4.. [12:01] I think it will replace mine [12:01] isn't possible to say that libtiff5 is the same and just "use that"? [12:01] oh, probably uninstall the deb, make another change and rebuild [12:01] say that it provides libtiff4? [12:02] btw, quantal has both packages, so maybe they can work together? [12:03] btw, sorry patdk-lap, have to go to lunch, I'll talk to you later if you still have time.. thanks alot anyway for now!! [12:04] they can *work together*, but everything in precise will default to the old package :) [12:05] what you can do is edit the control file again, and change tiff5 to tiff4 [12:05] that should do it [12:05] forget how to say, also provides === cronus__ is now known as cronus [13:14] jamespage/yolanda: https://code.launchpad.net/~zulcss/python-keystoneclient/0.2.3/+merge/154076 [13:15] ok [13:23] Daviey: ping...can you review python-ceilometerclient its still stuck in binary-new [13:24] zul: src new? [13:24] zul, swift rc'ed btw [13:24] Daviey: yeah [13:25] jamespage: ill get to it next [13:27] patdk-lap: "forget how to say, also provides"? [13:27] jamespage: tarball was cut? [13:27] zul, no idea - I switch to the milestone-proposed branch for ci [13:27] zul, I think 1.8.0-rc1 was being prepared [13:27] jamespage: oh ok [13:28] yeah they actually havent caught a tarball for it yet though :) === wedgwood_away is now known as wedgwood === luminous_ is now known as luminous [13:38] jamespage: http://people.canonical.com/~chucks/ca/ [13:41] jamespage: I think you helped me once before with a libvirt regression, do you have any vm hosts running raring you can try some live migrations? [13:42] mine are failing since I started testing beyond 12.10 [13:43] mardraum, give me 20 mins and I can switch my testing from precise->raring for grizzly [13:43] thanks. if you scrollback you'll see what I am getting using virsh migrate [13:44] zul, typo in changelog btw [13:44] zul, 'releaes' [13:44] jamespage: frigging [13:48] mardraum, I don't have a rig with shared storage; but I should be able to test it with live-block migration I think [13:49] ok, thanks. if that works for you I'll try that too [14:07] mardraum: I don't have a rig with shared storage either, but usually reproduce with some cloud instances with nfs when I need to. But for something like this with so many variables, a launchpad bug where we can track info is usually best [14:07] mardraum: do you mind opening one, with xml files for your vms and storage, and your exact commands? [14:08] sure. also I just finished testing using --copy-storage-all after creating the img on the receiving end and got the same error. [14:14] heh, the attempt also makes the vm mount ro, sigh [14:14] and a bsd vm panic as a filesystem disappears [14:15] I'm going to rule out openvswitch too first [14:15] I'll go back to the old bridging and see if that works === phretor_ is now known as phretor [14:31] can anyone help me with postfix+courier-imap ? i just need a correct mysql database structure [14:36] :< [14:37] f4c3p4lm: Are you following a guide in particular? flurdy.com has one [14:37] patdk-lap: btw, got everything to work.. it seems..thanks man! [14:38] histo, i followed a guide cant recall which one [14:38] i just need the database [14:38] all the rest is OK [14:38] my db is incorrect [14:38] i know that there are missing tables [14:39] dont know the names and fields [14:39] f4c3p4lm: i would look to flurdy.com for examples. How are we going to guess what sort of tables your configs use etc... [14:39] ill look for the guide but [14:39] f4c3p4lm: each guide is different they could have used any format/table name they wanted [14:40] isnt there a generic one? [14:41] http://flurdy.com/docs/postfix/edition8.html [14:41] would this be the one? [14:44] f4c3p4lm: http://flurdy.com/docs/postfix/index.html [14:45] f4c3p4lm: specifically http://flurdy.com/docs/postfix/index.html#config-simple-database section [14:45] hum [14:45] thanks [14:46] my database looks exactly like that one :D [14:46] hey guys i have dvecot setup using sieve which conf file do i need to look at to ensure its enabled [14:46] !sieve === dduffey_afk is now known as dduffey [15:27] zul, http://people.canonical.com/~jamespage/ca-updates/ [15:27] quantum and cinder [15:29] jamespage: +1 [15:30] I'm setting up a mail server for a small client. SHould I use virtual mailbox maps? Or just linux accounts with nologin [15:31] So far I've installed the mail-stack-delivery package and my self generated certs [15:32] Just looking for someone's opinions [15:54] hallyn: ping, I got a weird error while trying to create a kvm since I upgraded to raring, can you help me refining the diagnosis ? virt-install (which was working fine with quantal and even on raring on my laptop) is now failing with: error: ERROR An error occurred, but the cause is unknown [15:55] vila: do you mind opening a bug? add teh full command line you're using, and /var/log/libvirt/libvirtd.log and /var/lib/libvirt/qemu/.log if it exists. [15:56] i don't actually use virt-install, so not sure offhand if it'd be a bug in that, or libvirt, or qemu [15:56] hallyn: ~/.virtinst/virt-install.log is slightly more helpful: http://paste.ubuntu.com/5628501/ [15:56] oh, ok, usually it isn't :) checking [15:56] oh you're using virtualbox [15:56] hehe, at least there is a stacktrace [15:56] hallyn: no, not anymore, but it's still installed [15:58] hallyn: but I too found it weird that vbox appeared there [15:58] vila: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 16:48:26 virt-install 15392] DEBUG (cli:333) Received libvirt URI vbox:///system [15:58] vila: waht command line are you using for virt-install? [15:59] hallyn: it's in the paste, second line [15:59] vila: oh, or you might look through /etc/libvirt/libvirtd.conf for any defaults set to vbox [16:02] hallyn: only comments there (so only default values ?) and I didn't touch it. The only thing I can remember changing are: /etc/libvirt/storage/default.xml to use /caviar3/libvirt/images and using br0 (though I can't remember whre exactly), but I made these changes while running precise I think [16:04] vila: allr ight, please open a bug aginst lbivirt. lbivirt is telling virtinst that vbox is the default uri. i dont' know why offhand [16:04] * hallyn must move to server meeting [16:04] hallyn: ack [16:04] thx [16:12] hallyn: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/1157272 [16:12] Launchpad bug 1157272 in libvirt "fail to create vm since upgrade to raring" [Undecided,New] === tsaavik_ is now known as tsaavik [16:23] hallyn: uninstalling vbox worked around the issue, comment added to the bug [16:41] vila: thanks much [16:42] note, i don't t hink you canrun kvm and vbox at the same time [16:42] hallyn: my pleasure. It may still be worth fixing this bug, my team has use cases where kvm is not appropriate yet [16:42] hallyn: yup, fully understood [16:43] hallyn: but in the past, I could at least run one or the other [16:43] hallyn: which was crucial to allow me to migrate to kvm... [16:43] vila: but if you install vbox, but don't have any vobx instances running, [16:43] oh wait, lemme go check the code... [16:44] hallyn: that was the case, I tried uninstalling vbox by supersitition and because you mentioned you didn't expect to see vbox there [16:44] hallyn: but I haven't started a vbox vm for.. months and certainly not since I rebooted ;) [16:44] I've had success in the past unloading the vbox module, modprobing the kvm module, and continuing on... [16:46] vila: oh, sorry, i thought you said somewhere you had two vbox instances up and running, [16:46] sarnold: would have been delicate in my case, most of them were started by jenkins [16:46] sarnold: you're *supposed* to no longer need to do that [16:46] sarnold: but my guess is libvirt simply checks for vbox before kvm [16:46] so that vbox becomes teh default if availab.e zul^ do you know if that's true? [16:46] hallyn: no, two vbox related processes (the services.. can't remember the names) [16:46] hallyn: no kidding! :) There's no end to the wonders in the world... :) [16:47] vila: heh, delicate indeed :) it's not the same as just driving your laptop.. heh. [16:47] vila: oh, got it, thx. never used vbox, didn't realize it left taskshaning :) [16:47] sarnold: hehe [16:48] hallyn: yeah, something may have changed, I thought those services were only started when the first vbox vm was... [16:48] hallyn: but now that you mention it, that may have been libvirt starting them... [16:49] hallyn: like: libvirt: hmm, what do we have here ? Do we have vbox ? vbox: Me ? Let me start ! [16:50] hallyn: AFAIR, those processes were supposed to shut down themselves when inactive and uninstall complained that they were still running and failed, I had to kill-9 them [16:50] vila: right. if you specify '-c qemu:///' it'll use kvm, but if you don't it uses a default [16:50] we would want the default to be kvm though [16:51] heh, perahps a vbox bug is in order [16:51] as in --connect qemu://system ? I tried that but got another obscure error [16:51] oh wait 3 / not 2 ? [16:52] yeah [16:52] it's 'qemu://host/{system,session}' [16:53] * vila reinstalls vbox to try ;) [16:54] vila: can you check /etc/libvirt/libvirt.conf for a uri_default setting? [16:54] and env | grep URI [16:54] libvirt honors those if set [16:54] hallyn: I did, nothing there, ha, well, commented out that is [16:54] #uri_default = "qemu:///system" [16:55] urgh, 3 / there, I hate my tyops :-( [16:55] vila: yeah, that's commented out in the distro file. not sure if we want to uncomment that [16:56] hallyn: virt-install -c qemu:///system will take precedence right ? [16:57] hallyn: I have a script that encapsulates the calls to virt-install so I can fix it there [16:57] hallyn: and yeah, given the comment in libvirt.conf, it's a fallback [16:57] # This can be used to prevent probing of the hypervisor [16:57] # driver when no URI is supplied by the application. [17:02] I've got a Dell Power Edge R515 with an Opteron 4334 6 core processor with 12.04 server installed on it. I'm only seeing 1 core. Anybody have any ideas what I should look at? Uname -a to follow: [17:03] Linux XXXXXXX 3.5.0-26-generic #42~precise1-Ubuntu SMP Mon Mar 11 22:17:58 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux [17:05] Not sure how you "seeing 1 core", but you can check: cat /proc/cpuinfo or start top and press "1" [17:05] cpuinfo is only showing 1 core. [17:05] as is htop [17:06] TristamWrk: is the system bios configured to only run one core? [17:06] sarnold, it better not be or I'm going to smack Dell. I will have to run downstairs and check. [17:08] I will have to do so after this person calls me back. [17:13] How about: cat /var/log/dmesg | grep SMP also: lshw -class cpu === unreal is now known as CaptainBirdseye [17:20] plars: hey, what is the protocol for filing a bug against packages in linaro ppas? [17:21] just email whoever is in the changelog, i assume? :) [17:21] hallyn: what's the project? [17:22] plars: qemu-linaro [17:23] hallyn: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu-linaro [17:23] plars: that pkg doesn't exist in raring though... only in ppa... stillu se it? [17:24] ok, i'll mark it affecting that, thanks :) [17:24] hallyn: probably - it wouldn't hurt to email the package maintainer also though [17:26] hallyn: if nothing else, ping fabo on #linaro - I'm sure he can get you to the right place [17:26] plars: ok, thanks [17:34] alright, I checked the bios and all the cores are enabled. [17:35] Tris: can you check your dmesg log like I posted above [17:42] mistigi, I didn't scroll up when I got back to my desk..sorry [17:42] TristamWrk: < mistigi> How about: cat /var/log/dmesg | grep SMP also: lshw -class cpu [17:43]