[05:37] ScottK: I'm looking at the build log for armhf, and I'm not seeing the issue... [05:42] Responded on LP. [08:15] good morning === bdrung_ is now known as bdrung === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away [12:20] I have a noob question: If I package a new software will it only be included in the universe of raring? Or is there a way to include it to older versions too, like precise ? [12:21] you could offer backports via a ppa [12:21] hmm? [12:21] or even real backports, if its really worth it [12:21] you could offer backports via -backports, indeed [12:23] no i think it will not be so much in use. on sourceforge there are 100 downloads per months. so i think i will put that into my ppa. thanks. [12:41] if a [need-packaging] bug in LP is assigned to MOTU, can I assign it to myself, or does that mean that a MOTU guy will will do that? [12:46] yuckfou: have you a bug number to check? [12:47] there are many. for example this one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/99299 [12:48] Launchpad bug 99299 in Ubuntu "[needs-packaging] exist" [Wishlist,Confirmed] [12:50] yuckfou: Assign it to you if you want to work in it. Having such a bug assigned to MOTU doesn't make much sense (IMHO). [12:51] Yes it also appeared strange to me. ok thanks for the info === mitya57_ is now known as mitya57 [13:27] in Testdrive: I want to have a daily update of the raring ISO. So when I launch it in the virtual machine, should I click "Try Ubuntu" or "Install Ubuntu" ? === barry` is now known as barry_ === barry_ is now known as barry === yofel_ is now known as yofel [17:48] 'afternoon :) [17:58] wtf why is there a scilab upload in proposed ... [17:59] untested before upload of course ._. [18:00] oh well that at least saves me from filing an ffe [18:00] as now it counts as bugfix right? [19:27] hm my mail to the pyqt list has still not appeared :( [19:34] ScottK: I'm turning that FFe into a merge per what you said about the armv7l target - testing it out in my PPA now. [19:35] Logan_: I don't know for sure either way, all I'm saying is you need to check the build logs "It built" is not sufficient. [19:36] I just figured that the only reason they added the target was because it wasn't building on armel, and, since it now builds on armhf, I figured it was unnecessary. But let's see if it builds in the PPA with the armv7l target. [19:36] I might contact the person who added the target to see if he thinks it's necessary, but he hasn't been active on LP recently. [19:38] I think you'll be able to tell from comparing the build logs. [19:39] Okay, cool. [19:40] ScottK: So my 64 bit support Ecere version is in raring-proposed. But it broke ppc builds... (but fixes amd64) [19:40] Fix it then ... [19:40] ScottK: I'm guessing there are more amd64 users than ppc users though? :) [19:40] ScottK: I have a SunSPARC here (also big endian) that I plan to set up today... [19:40] Right, but you should be able to make it work fr both ... [19:41] ScottK: I should and I will, just not sure when :P but I'm gonna try to get it running on the SPARC this weekend and then we can retry the build on the ppc buildbot... [19:41] ScottK: but if I do get it running within a week, it can still make it? [19:46] For a bug fix like that, certainly [19:50] cool. I'll try on the SPARC, and otherwise I'll try to get my hands on a PPC [19:51] thanks [21:24] if my screen brightness lowers fine via echo to /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video/brightness, but my hot keys do not, which package should I look to fix it in? [21:42] sharms: it may be gnome-settings-daemon.., but it could also be other package.., I'd suggest to look at: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Hotkeys/Troubleshooting [22:13] How likely is it for an updated leaf game package to get into Raring at the moment, 10% or just zilch? (I'm looking for sponsors for experimental atm) [22:26] arand: For a game, probably pretty decent. [22:27] Ok, then I'll scale the nagging of sponsors accordingly :) === echidnaman is now known as JontheEchidna