[05:37] <Logan_> ScottK: I'm looking at the build log for armhf, and I'm not seeing the issue...
[05:42] <Logan_> Responded on LP.
[08:15] <dholbach> good morning
[12:20] <yuckfou> I have a noob question: If I package a new software will it only be included in the universe of raring? Or is there a way to include it to older versions too, like precise ?
[12:21] <Zhenech> you could offer backports via a ppa
[12:21] <Laney> hmm?
[12:21] <Zhenech> or even real backports, if its really worth it
[12:21] <Laney> you could offer backports via -backports, indeed
[12:23] <yuckfou> no i think it will not be so much in use. on sourceforge there are 100 downloads per months. so i think i will put that into my ppa. thanks.
[12:41] <yuckfou> if a [need-packaging] bug in LP is assigned to MOTU, can I assign it to myself, or does that mean that a MOTU guy will will do that?
[12:46] <geser> yuckfou: have you a bug number to check?
[12:47] <yuckfou> there are many. for example this one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/99299
[12:50] <geser> yuckfou: Assign it to you if you want to work in it. Having such a bug assigned to MOTU doesn't make much sense (IMHO).
[12:51] <yuckfou> Yes it also appeared strange to me. ok thanks for the info
[13:27] <yuckfou> in Testdrive: I want to have a daily update of the raring ISO. So when I launch it in the virtual machine, should I click "Try Ubuntu" or "Install Ubuntu" ?
[17:48] <ESphynx> 'afternoon :)
[17:58] <jtaylor> wtf why is there a scilab upload in proposed ...
[17:59] <jtaylor> untested before upload of course ._.
[18:00] <jtaylor> oh well that at least saves me from filing an ffe
[18:00] <jtaylor> as now it counts as bugfix right?
[19:27] <jtaylor> hm my mail to the pyqt list has still not appeared :(
[19:34] <Logan_> ScottK: I'm turning that FFe into a merge per what you said about the armv7l target - testing it out in my PPA now.
[19:35] <ScottK> Logan_: I don't know for sure either way, all I'm saying is you need to check the build logs "It built" is not sufficient.
[19:36] <Logan_> I just figured that the only reason they added the target was because it wasn't building on armel, and, since it now builds on armhf, I figured it was unnecessary. But let's see if it builds in the PPA with the armv7l target.
[19:36] <Logan_> I might contact the person who added the target to see if he thinks it's necessary, but he hasn't been active on LP recently.
[19:38] <ScottK> I think you'll be able to tell from comparing the build logs.
[19:39] <Logan_> Okay, cool.
[19:40] <ESphynx> ScottK: So my 64 bit support Ecere version is in raring-proposed. But it broke ppc builds... (but fixes amd64)
[19:40] <ScottK> Fix it then ...
[19:40] <ESphynx> ScottK: I'm guessing there are more amd64 users than ppc users though? :)
[19:40] <ESphynx> ScottK: I have a SunSPARC here (also big endian) that I plan to set up today...
[19:40] <ScottK> Right, but you should be able to make it work fr both ...
[19:41] <ESphynx> ScottK: I should and I will, just not sure when :P but I'm gonna try to get it running on the SPARC this weekend and then we can retry the build on the ppc buildbot...
[19:41] <ESphynx> ScottK: but if I do get it running within a week, it can still make it?
[19:46] <ScottK> For a bug fix like that, certainly
[19:50] <ESphynx> cool. I'll try on the SPARC, and otherwise I'll try to get my hands on a PPC
[19:51] <ESphynx> thanks
[21:24] <sharms> if my screen brightness lowers fine via echo to /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video/brightness, but my hot keys do not, which package should I look to fix it in?
[21:42] <chilicuil> sharms: it may be gnome-settings-daemon.., but it could also be other package.., I'd suggest to look at: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Hotkeys/Troubleshooting
[22:13] <arand> How likely is it for an updated leaf game package to get into Raring at the moment, 10% or just zilch? (I'm looking for sponsors for experimental atm)
[22:26] <ScottK> arand: For a game, probably pretty decent.
[22:27] <arand> Ok, then I'll scale the nagging of sponsors accordingly :)