[08:51] <qt> hello all
[08:51] <qt> I've a problem with my project on Launchpad
[08:52] <qt> I had a commercial subscription which has expired on March, 23th
[08:52] <qt> and now, I can't push a new branch on this project
[08:54] <qt> A ticket was opened to fix the problem (#31200) but I come to you today because this project is for a professional purpose and I need the possibility to push new branches on this project.
[08:55] <qt> Anyone can help me ?
[08:57] <czajkowski> project needs to be made active again
[08:57] <czajkowski> you will also need to change the licence
[08:57] <czajkowski> qt what is the name of the project please
[08:58] <qt> unifield-wm
[08:58] <czajkowski> wgrant / stevenk could one of you please make that project active. currently not at desktop
[08:59] <czajkowski> qt are yiubgoing to buy anothher commercial voucher
[08:59] <czajkowski> ?
[09:00] <qt> no, the project is now open source and I don't want to buy another commercial subscription
[09:00] <czajkowski> ok once its active again yiubwill need to change licence.
[09:01] <qt> The licence is already 'GNU Affero GPL v3'
[09:03] <czajkowski> well if wgrant or stevenk cant get to it I will do it shortly
[09:03] <qt> ok, thanks a lot
[09:06] <qt> plus, I feel some configurations are lost (code hosting, branding…)
[09:06] <qt> Is there a possibility to revert that or I should configure again the project ?
[09:10] <czajkowski> nothing should be lost qt
[09:11] <czajkowski> like isaid it's inactive  it just needs to be made active however i am currently not at my desktop
[09:12] <qt> ok
[10:21] <czajkowski> qt: your project is active
[10:25] <qt> thanks czajkowski, but the configuration has been lost !
[10:26] <czajkowski> I'm not sure what you mean tbh.
[10:28] <qt> on https://code.launchpad.net/unifield-wm i have this message : "A development focus branch hasn't been specified, set it now." while it was configured in the past
[10:33] <czajkowski> qt: https://launchpad.net/unifield-wm/trunk/+setbranch
[10:43] <qt> thanks, but it does mean that we have lost all series and milestones configuration !
[10:43] <qt> and need reconfigure all of them
[10:53] <czajkowski> I've not seen that happen before but I'll ask wgrant or StevenK if this is known since you had a commercial ac before hand
[10:58] <qt> ok, thanks for your support
[16:13] <jonrafkind> I have been getting launchpad chroot build errors on maverick and karmick for a while: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/135181576/buildlog_ubuntu-maverick-i386.racket_5.3.3.7-20130325~maverick_CHROOTWAIT.txt.gz
[16:15] <dobey> jonrafkind: maverick and karmic have not been supported for a while. you should disable any builds you have configured to run on them
[16:15] <jonrafkind> so why are they options in launchpad
[16:16] <dobey> jonrafkind: they aren't. they only look like options if you already had them selected while they were supported. if you disable them, they should no longer appear as options
[16:16] <dobey> (i do agree that the lack of obviousness/automatedness of all that is annoying though)
[16:16] <jonrafkind> which distros should i disable
[16:17] <jonrafkind> i mean whats the last supported one
[16:18] <dobey> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases
[16:20] <dobey> 11.10 will EOL next month. i guess 10.04 will still work on launchpad as server won't be EOL (but desktop will). precise will be active for 4 more years still. quantal for another year, and raring for another ~10 months
[16:20] <jonrafkind> the narwhal build still somehow works even though its EOL
[16:20] <jonrafkind> im guessing maverick and karmick just happen to not work due to some misconfiguration error rather than someone explicitly flipping some switch
[16:21] <dobey> no, maverick and karmic don't work because the archive has been deleted off the server. i guess maybe that hasn't happened yet for natty. when it does though then build failures will happen for anything configured to build on natty on launchpad
[16:22] <jonrafkind> ok
[16:34] <crass> anyone know why https://code.launchpad.net/~crass/libtorrent/trunk is saying its importing changes, but no changes are found?
[16:40] <dobey> crass: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/135215599/crass-libtorrent-trunk.log
[16:41] <dobey> crass: i think you need to use the git:// URL for github branches. iirc there's a problem with using https, because github wants a specific user-agent value from git, which is not what bzr uses.
[16:47] <crass> thanks dobey, I'll try that
[16:49] <crass> maybe that UA requirement is newish, because as you can see it was importing before
[16:57] <crass> and any ideas why https://code.launchpad.net/~vcs-imports/grub/grub2-bzr says updating branch? it seems to be stuck there
[17:48] <dobey> crass: it seems the mirror is broken so perhaps it caused the branch scanner to fail on that branch for some reason
[17:49] <dobey> crass: yeah, not sure why it was imported before. but the checks are grey, not green. not sure what that means either
[22:02] <Luke-Jr> trying to upload to my PPA - I don't use a Debian-related distro though.. don't seem to get any reaction from LP
[22:02] <Luke-Jr> can anyone check the PPA server and see what I'm doing wrong, or is there any advice for uploading PPA stuff manually?
[22:02] <Luke-Jr> I'm just sftp put'ing the .dsc .tbz2 and .changes files
[22:28] <Luke-Jr> using dput itself seems to be ignored as well :/
[22:29] <StevenK> If your upload is unsigned, it will seem to be ignored because Launchpad can't work out who to mail.
[22:30] <Luke-Jr> it's signed
[22:30] <StevenK> And Launchpad knows about the key it's signed with?
[22:32] <StevenK> 2013-03-25 22:30:11 INFO    Failed to parse changes file '/srv/launchpad.net/ppa
[22:32] <StevenK> -queue/incoming/upload-ftp-20130325-222706-003570/~luke-jr/bfgminer/ubuntu/bfgmi
[22:32] <StevenK> ner_2.10.5-0precise1.changes': Signing key E463A93F5F3117EEDE6C7316BD02942421F48
[22:32] <StevenK> 89F not registered in launchpad.
[22:33] <Luke-Jr> oh, LP only has my old key
[22:33]  * Luke-Jr tries again
[22:35] <Luke-Jr> direct sftp seems to ignored still.. trying dput/ftp now
[22:35] <Luke-Jr> hrm Package has already been uploaded to bfgminer on ppa.launchpad.net
[22:35] <StevenK> That's dput saying it's already uploaded it
[22:35] <StevenK> dput -f
[22:36] <Luke-Jr> any idea what went wrong with the sftp?
[22:38] <StevenK> If you just put three files in the root, that.
[22:38] <StevenK> You need to make directories and make sure they're named correctly, so LP can work out which PPA you're targetting.
[22:39] <Luke-Jr> put bfgminer_2.10.5-0precise1.dsc ~luke-jr/bfgminer/ubuntu/bfgminer_2.10.5-0precise1.dsc
[22:41] <StevenK> I've not seen another upload in the logs.
[22:42] <Luke-Jr> dput finished and still no reaction :/
[22:43] <StevenK> The upload processor runs every five minutes, it isn't instant.
[22:43] <Luke-Jr> I see.
[22:46] <Luke-Jr> hmm, I really need to reupload the files for every arch? :/
[22:47] <StevenK> No, your arch should be 'source'
[22:47] <StevenK> bfgminer_2.10.5-0precise1_source.changes
[22:48] <Luke-Jr> aha
[22:49] <Luke-Jr> StevenK: are the source files deleted after each build, or can I use the same tbz2 for multiple releases?
[22:51] <StevenK> Luke-Jr: If your upload only has two files, you're probably aren't going to convince LP to do so. If you have .orig.tar.gz (or bz2 or whatever), then it can referenced by multiple releases, as long as it isn't rebuilt (IE: it has the same checksum and contents)
[22:52] <Luke-Jr> StevenK: is ~luke-jr the standard /home/luke-jr (can I use the latter if I end up with a FTP client that only supports absolute paths)?
[22:53] <StevenK> It is not
[22:54] <StevenK> Your client is chrooted on connection, so it's /~luke-jr
[22:54] <Luke-Jr> k
[23:09] <Luke-Jr> StevenK: any idea what that last error was about? pretty sure I uploaded the files it's saying are missing
[23:26] <Luke-Jr> StevenK: also getting part of the error from dput :/
[23:44] <StevenK> 2013-03-25 23:40:25 DEBUG   Unable to identify file bfgminer-2.10.5-0precise1_so
[23:44] <StevenK> urce.tbz2 (misc) in changes.
[23:45] <StevenK> Luke-Jr: How did you make this source package? LP is quite strict about what it expects.
[23:48] <wgrant> This isn't just LP
[23:48] <wgrant> This is dpkg