[00:34] <bkerensa> bdmurray: the lack of it being in a ppa will suck but oh well :D
[00:34] <bkerensa> bdmurray: how are the .js's licensed?
[00:41] <bdmurray> bkerensa: I'm gonna have a look at the firefox add on builder
[00:41] <bkerensa> +1
[00:42] <bkerensa> bdmurray: you think its in that code?
[00:42] <bdmurray> something with the extension builder I'm using perhaps
[00:43] <bkerensa> bdmurray: So it seems last year when the version also got bumped it broke then too and you made two changes
[00:43] <bkerensa> one to the version max
[00:43] <bkerensa> and some kind of identifier string?
[00:43] <bdmurray> that was a different issue having to due with it not having a unique id
[00:44] <bkerensa> oh ok
[00:44] <bkerensa> bdmurray: I mean do a lot of people use this ppa?
[00:44] <bkerensa> I love it... it makes work flow on bugs much better
[00:44] <bdmurray> I love it too but don't believe many people use it
[00:46] <bdmurray> there have been 16 downloads of the new version
[00:49] <bkerensa> bdmurray: So I am asking Brian King he is a Community Manager for Mozilla
[00:49] <bkerensa> but a wizard add on maker
[00:49] <bkerensa> maybe he could bundle these into a add-on or give me some advice on it
[00:50] <bkerensa> apparently he has no time :(
[00:50] <bkerensa> 16 people of the new version
[00:50] <bkerensa> thats not bad at all
[01:50] <bkerensa> slangasek: gtk2-engines-pixbuf seems to have bad depends http://paste.ubuntu.com/5648263/
[07:02] <slangasek> bkerensa: nothing there about depends; it shows mismatched contents in a multiarch: same package.  But I can't reproduce the problem here, do you have a locally-built version of the package?
[07:03] <slangasek> bkerensa: workaround: sudo mv /usr/share/doc/gtk2-engines-pixbuf/AUTHORS{,.bak}; sudo apt-get -f install; diff -u /usr/share/doc/gtk2-engines-pixbuf/AUTHORS{,.bak} to see what's going on
[08:32] <bkerensa> slangasek: do you know where we are pulling vala from? I see you did a recent change in it... There is a bug thats fixed in 0.18.1 we have 0.18.0 in raring
[08:32] <bkerensa> looks like Debian abandoned it
[08:33] <bkerensa> slangasek: When I had that issue it was with the Unity Daily PPA that I was testing to see how this FFe is going to go... it broke a mess of stuff
[08:33] <bkerensa> =/
[08:33] <bkerensa> I already purged it
[15:15] <slangasek> bkerensa: we're pulling vala from wherever vala comes from; I'm pretty sure the only thing I touched on it was packaging-related, for multiarch cross-build support
[15:58] <nathwill> happy tuesday everyone!
[16:24] <nathwill> how's everyone doing?
[17:57] <bkerensa> slangasek: ahh
[17:58] <bkerensa> slangasek: did you see I ported xfce4-power-manager to use logind
[18:03] <slangasek> bkerensa: I caught that, nice :)
[18:36] <bkerensa> slangasek: you interested in doing a beering next month since all the Canonical/Ubuntu folk will be in town for OpenStack Summit?
[18:37] <slangasek> bkerensa: are you asking if I'm interested in organizing one or attending one? ;)
[18:37] <bkerensa> slangasek: attending... I can organize
[18:39] <bkerensa> slangasek: also debian folk coming too
[18:39] <bkerensa> pleia2 who runs the Bay Area Debian Dinners will be up
[18:39] <slangasek> sure, I imagine I'm up for a beering that week
[18:40] <bkerensa> slangasek: any preference on time of evening? :)
[18:43] <slangasek> probably not? :)
[22:11] <blkperl> is there a way to search launchpad for debian bugs>?
[22:11] <blkperl> to see if the issue already exhists in launchpa
[22:14] <blkperl> claims to be fixed in debian but ubuntu has the same version and the problem still exhists
[22:20] <bdmurray> blkperl:
[22:20] <bdmurray> https://launchpad.net/bugs/bugtrackers/debbugs
[22:20] <bdmurray> that has "bug watches" for debian bugs which may be what you are looking for
[22:21] <bdmurray> its not easily searchable though