[13:16] hey micahg, have you had any luck with catfish? Is there anything I can look at? [14:43] micahg, mr_pouit: could one of you please update Greybird to v1.1.1 in shimmer-themes in order to fix bug #1158431 in Raring? [14:43] bug 1158431 in shimmer-themes (Ubuntu) "lightdm graybird login issues on raring" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1158431 === J21_ is now known as J21 [16:19] articles! [16:22] how many pages did we have all in all? [16:23] 16 [16:23] "Installing Themes" and "Managing Themes and Styles" still need authors [16:24] I can reach out beyond our -devel list if needed [16:24] mmh [16:24] i'm wondering if we should combine those [16:24] i don't think they easily make 2 pages on their own [16:24] ah, good point [16:24] there [16:25] will we link to the pad urls from the wiki ? [16:25] yeah, I don't think we have to worry too much about vandalism [16:26] yeah, good [16:26] when would you have some time to work on "our" article? [16:27] or think if there's something else we should cover [16:28] should have some time over the weekend, sunday morning around this time [16:28] or you can get started and I can pitch in during the evenings this week as I have time [16:29] (I am mostly working during knome awake times during the week, like now) [16:29] heh, yeah [16:29] what about the latter stuff? [16:30] i think at this point it would be better if we played editors and thought what we still need [16:30] and possibly do some estimates on how many pages would each article cover [16:31] I don't know that we can do the estimates, I don't know what people intend to write [16:31] but yeah, we should mostly be editors, I don't know what other articles to add though [16:31] mmh [16:31] i'll try to think about them and post to the channel [16:32] wanna create pads and link to wiki? I need to dive into work [16:32] mmh, i can [16:32] hf [16:32] +follow up on list [16:32] thanks [16:32] sure [16:32] np [16:49] done [17:04] I have a question about reporting bugs during testing. I download an ISO, install it, test it, and run across a bug. I search, can't find it already reported so I create a new bug report. But the next day, on the next ISO, the bug is no longer there. I then go and change the bug status to invalid. Is this the correct way to go about it? I am checking md5 so I'm confident in the ISO integrity but maybe I sho [17:05] yes, that is correct, if the problem persist then you have pinpointed its origin [17:06] scottbomb, for possible future regressions, i'd comment the date the bug appeared and the date when it disappeared [17:12] So I do report it the first time I see it? [17:12] scottbomb, sure, as usual [17:12] Cool thanks. [17:13] scottbomb, then if it disappears, mark it invalid and comment "this no longer exists in image from xxxxxxxx" [17:21] Will do, thanks. [19:57] is it possible to use gnome-screensaver instead of xscreensaver, it's not pretty either, but the pic is less scary [20:06] Noskcaj: Have you looked at the depends of that package or even installed it? [20:06] is there a not-crazy way for us to patch xscreensaver with a less scary picture? [20:07] "amagad computer on fire... no wait just screen lock, what?" [20:08] Unit193, i have it installed, forgot what else it installed though [20:09] looks like we can edit the colors with a config, but not the image [20:09] pleia2, no, there's a lot of discussion on the ubuntu forums about it [20:09] libgnome-desktop-3-4, which depends on gnome-desktop3-data and many more fun things. [20:09] yeah, gnome-screensaver pulls in like half of gnome :( [20:13] Just replace the xscreensaver-5.15/utils/images/logo*xmp files and recompile. :P [20:15] Unit193, you say it as though that's easy [20:16] Well, I was kidding, but not too bad with pbuilder. [20:20] I think it would be easy, but it is a patch we'd have to carry and that's never delightful (looks like we just sync from debian now?) [20:20] and I don't think the rest of ubuntu would love us if we stuck a mouse on it :) [20:20] maddernick: plz make us a xubuntu-xscreensaver [20:21] wasn't ochosi working on something like that? [20:21] lol, maybe if you make it look for an external photo, lubuntu won't hate us [20:22] maddernick: I know he was reviewing alternatives a while back [20:22] ah [20:22] maybe for 13.10 :) [20:22] it is something people complain about though, I watched my fiance go through the "whoa, what the" moment when he installed xubuntu [20:23] "oh that's just the lock screen" "with FIRE?!" [20:24] hehe, iirc its quite a pain to make screensavers, and image formats etc complicate matters [20:24] not screensavers, just changing the image on the lock dialog [20:24] the screensavers are fine :) [20:25] same thing applies :P [20:26] There was, iirc, this one little thing that made it horrid, I may have to look into what that was again ;) [20:26] pleia2: He was looking for lockers. [20:26] there's /usr/share/pixmaps/xscreensaver.svg & /usr/share/pixmaps/xscreensaver.xpm [20:26] http://www.swanson.ukfsn.org/xss/ explains how to make them [20:26] (and has a patch) [20:26] (It never really worried me, I don't get the big fuss over it.) [20:27] Unit193: we put all this work into making xubuntu beautiful :) [20:27] and then have a crunchy looking flaming computer pop up [20:28] yeah [20:29] pleia2: Sure, but that's a given. :P [20:40] maddernick, pleia2: yes, i'm working on a locker for lightdm [20:40] hopefully we can use it in R+1 [20:40] (it's already working though) [20:45] ochosi, can we have it in a PPA for testing purposes [20:46] if you put it in one, then yes :) [20:46] based on some of the things I've seen requested and my own experience, i think it would be worthwhile to make a basic proxy app for xubuntu/xfce [20:46] as soon as we've done a first release, i'm considering packaging [20:46] but not really before that [20:46] bluesabre_: +1 [20:47] bluesabre_: +2 [20:47] I might play with that with all the extra time I'll have while in NY next month [20:47] as well as learning java and who knows what else [20:50] bluesabre_, +3 [20:53] (Though, I wouldn't personally use such a tool.) [20:54] bluesabre_: Have you seen the "LXProxy" ? It doesn't seem to have gone much of anywhere, buuut. [20:54] I'll look into that. Thanks Unit193 [20:55] hullo. [20:55] hey knome [20:55] march 26, the official worldwide day of confused clients [20:55] :) [20:56] (not in a bad way, i've just been explaining stuff to several ones today) [20:59] ho-humm [21:11] knome, but it's the 27th. stupid timezones [21:12] i've added some stuff to most of the magazine articles, if anyone wants to look over them [21:12] i think it was 26th even in your TZ when i had those calls/discussions ;) [21:13] fortunately my clients don't call me at 11pm [21:13] (usually) [21:13] lol, it's 8am, so possibly [21:13] yeah, i just went them through. looks good === OutOfControl is now known as benonsoftware [23:22] bluesabre_: shouldn't a proxy-settings UI be rather simplish to do? basically just setting the ENV_VAR or is there more to it?