[04:05] <vibhav> j #ubuntu-community-team
[04:06] <vibhav> oops, sorry :)
[07:42] <Whoopie> debfx: Hi, I just wanted to remind you that the virtualbox unresolved symbol issue is still present with 4.2.10 (libGL error: dlopen /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dri/vboxvideo_dri.so failed (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dri/vboxvideo_dri.so: undefined symbol: XCompositeQueryExtension)).
[10:40] <doko> xnox, do you take care about the Tcl/Tk multiarch ftbfs?
[10:55] <doko> bdrung_, are you going to fix libarchive? sponsored by you
[10:57] <debfx> Whoopie: right, I completely forgot about that. I have done way too many virtualbox uploads yesterday ...
[11:08]  * mitya57_ wonders what MANUALDEPWAIT is
[11:13] <mitya57_> doko, bdrung_: looks like we need a MIR for lrzip to fix libarchive
[11:13] <doko> mitya57_, or drop the lrzip b-d
[11:19] <mitya57_> that'll introduce a delta that I don't think anybody wants to carry
[11:57] <didrocks> probably a stupid question, but does anyone know if we have a debhelper/dpkg command to know from a source package all archs from all the binaries file generated by this source?
[11:58] <didrocks> or should I do the parsing by hand?
[12:40] <debfx> Whoopie: I've uploaded a fix.
[13:11] <jdstrand> @pilot in
[13:29] <ScottK> ogra_: Congratulations on the chromium-browser build for armhf.
[13:29] <ogra_> ScottK, well, it was a one char fix
[13:29] <ScottK> It's not the size of the fix, it's finding where to make it.
[13:29] <ogra_> (the effort to get it into the package was way bigger than the fix itself)
[13:40] <mitya57> can we use "lite" version of upstream tarball (which probably has less embedded libraries)?
[13:40] <mitya57> https://gsdview.appspot.com/chromium-browser-official/?marker=chromium-21.0.1168.0.tar.bz%40
[13:44] <ogra_> well, that will likely also have less functionality
[13:44] <ogra_> err
[13:44] <ogra_> lite ?
[13:46] <ogra_> the saved 50M wont really help so much i guess
[13:59] <highvolt1ge> ogra_: very funny ;)
[13:59] <ogra_> :)
[14:16] <Riddell> ogra_: winding up my poor community! https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kubuntu-devel/2013-April/006928.html
[14:16] <ogra_> yeah, just heard about it :)
[14:16]  * ogra_ giggles 
[14:16] <ogra_> to sad he isnt aroudn to clearify
[14:17] <ScottK> Humor is apparently wasted on the young.
[14:17] <ogra_> yeah, i hope he isnt venting too much now
[14:19] <ScottK> Where did he fail to see the humor?  I must not be reading the right place?
[14:20] <dobey> ScottK: maybe he thinks the euro really is a stable currency
[14:20] <ScottK> Found it.
[14:21] <ScottK> That should have been enough of a clue right there.
[14:25] <ScottK> Apparently I try to trick my 10 year old daughter far too often on other days to make April Fools any fun at all.  She's sufficiently skeptical to start with, I didn't pull one off yet.
[14:33] <Riddell> dobey: that's the Hong Kong British legacy, euro is stable from the view of those of us using Sterling
[14:33] <ogra_> heh
[17:23] <infinity> siretart: Bah.  mplayer is FTBFS in raring and I didn't notice until after I uploaded an unrelated change.  Do you have a fix for the current failure?  Looks like it needs a bit of porting to a new API, maybe?
[17:49] <jdstrand> @pilot out
[18:49] <mterry> doko, why does component-mismatches point cinder to python-babel?  I can't see it from the source
[19:30] <doko> mterry: python-cinder depends on python-babel
[19:31] <mterry> doko, yar, I get that, but I'm just not sure how.  I grepped cinder source for babel, but got no hits
[19:33] <mterry> doko, ah...  in requires.txt, there is Babel.  But it's not used in the source I don't think
[19:33] <mterry> ah...  I get it now.  babel.cfg
[19:51] <mdz> soren, is TB in 10 minutes?
[19:52] <mdz> we're out of the DST triangle now right?
[19:52] <stgraber> my phone says it's in 10min
[19:52] <ogra_> europe is on summer time now
[19:53] <stgraber> and it's 21:00 in London in 10min, so yeah, TB meeting is in 10min
[19:53] <stgraber> (well, more like 7 by now)
[19:56] <mdz> has anyone heard from soren? he wasn't at the previous meeting
[19:57] <stgraber> mdz: he recently sent an e-mail to the TB mailing-list (27th)
[19:58] <mdz> I wonder if he knows he is chairing
[19:58] <stgraber> ah, yeah, looks like you didn't mention it in the minutes
[19:59] <siretart> infinity: bah, that looks like some change in liblivemedia is responsible for that
[19:59] <stgraber> mdz: anyway, if soren doesn't show up I'll chair
[20:00] <mdz> ok, thanks for that
[20:00] <mdz> I should have emailed him but didn't
[20:01] <siretart> infinity: when looking at the upstream's commits, this patch might fix it: http://paste.debian.net/246471/
[20:06] <soren> bryce: Can you join us in #ubuntu-meeting to talk about the Xserver MRE?
[20:20] <siretart> infinity: nope, that patch is obviously not enough :(
[20:42] <siretart> infinity: i think i have a workaround: disable live555 support completely for now. my testbuild is still running, but if it works, I'm going to upload that to raring. at least for the time being
[21:08] <infinity> BenC: New kernel based on 3.8.5, if you have the time to quickly rebase PPC.  If not, it can wait until post-beta.
[21:09] <BenC> infinity: Should I expect an ABI bump from 3.8.4?
[21:09] <infinity> Dunno.  Master had one, but that could be unrelated.
[21:10] <infinity> BenC: Not that it would hurt to artificially bump ABI, if you don't want to bother with a testbuild to find out.
[21:10] <infinity> (Of course, every time you skip a test build, upstream breaks one of your drivers...)
[21:12] <infinity> zequence / apw: Anyone going to get linux-lowlatency caught up?
[21:13] <zequence> infinity: I've prepared package sources in our team ppa. Not sure if I'm missing something still
[21:13] <infinity> zequence: For SRU or raring?  (I realize my question was originally ambiguous, since we're behind on a few releases)
[21:14] <zequence> infinity: SRU. I don't do raring yet
[21:16] <ScottK> If there's a desktop'ish person around you may want to rmadison unity-2d|grep raring and see if maybe something's getting auto updated that shouldn't.
[21:16] <infinity> ScottK: Looks fine to me...
[21:17] <ScottK> infinity: unity-2d is still being developed?
[21:17] <infinity> ScottK: No, it's just a transitional package that depends on unity for "smooth" upgrade purposes.
[21:17] <infinity> ScottK: And needs to be in place until 14.04.
[21:17] <ScottK> Ah.
[21:17] <ScottK> Forgot to check that bit.
[21:17] <ScottK> Thanks.
[21:18] <infinity> I use the term "smooth" very loosely here, since the world comes crashing down if you have no useful OpenGL support, but...
[21:19] <ogra_> in 14.04 unity will depend on Mir anyway ...
[21:53] <ScottK> http://techland.time.com/2013/04/01/google-april-fools/?hpt=hp_t4 <-- "We tried orange; brown: brown was a disaster."
[22:57] <infinity> BenC: So, yea or nay on the linux-ppc rebase?  Trying to decide if I hold off on a d-i upload for it or not.
[22:58] <infinity> BenC: (ARM has about 5 hours to go in its build, so sometime before that would be nice)
[22:59] <BenC> infinity: In about 30 minutes