[00:15] <ScottK> jtaylor: Your other option is file a removal bug.
[06:45] <dholbach> good morning
[06:50] <geser> good morning
[15:52] <ScottK> New version of openmsx-catapult needs to be packaged to allow openmsx to transition from proposed.  FFe pre-granted if someone wants to work on it.
[16:50] <jtaylor> ScottK: removal is an option, but on the other hand besides the easily fixed ftbfs there seems to be nothing wrong with it
[16:50] <jtaylor> (re cssed)
[16:53] <jtaylor> oh well with thinking about it probably wasted more time than necessary to fix it, yay me :)
[16:55] <lfaraone> A new version of libhesiod0 (DNS-based directory information, used by MIT, CMU, and some other institutions) was released that adds IDN support, resolves issues with setuid users, and removes GPL-incompatible code. The MIT Athena team would really like to see it in Raring. Based on the changelog, http://sprunge.us/ZKEN , is this likely to be approved for a FFe?
[16:55] <lfaraone> ScottK: and before you ask, I'm talking with the fd about Barry :)
[18:20] <ScottK> jtaylor: Sure.
[18:23] <ScottK> lfaraone: I hope "talking with FD" isn't something ominious.
[18:23] <lfaraone> filed as LP: #1164044
[18:24] <ScottK> lfaraone: Look at the output of reverse-depends -b libhesiod-dev and tell me (in the bug) what teting you've done with them.
[18:24] <lfaraone> ScottK: will do.
[18:24] <ScottK> If the answer is "not tested" you odds go way down.
[18:24] <lfaraone> there's also some licencing stuff fixed here. previously libhesiod0 had 4-clause BSD code, which is... probably a problem since pidgin depends on it. (via libzephyr0)
[18:28] <lfaraone> ScottK: we have tested some but not all of the reverse bin depends.
[18:29] <ScottK> Right, I'm pretty open to approve it as long as you've tested stuff.
[18:55] <ScottK> Elbrus: I don't mind sync'ing motif into raring.  If you can get someone to do the initial sync, I'll push it through New (count this as your FFe approval).
[18:56] <Elbrus> ScottK: great, so I just have to find a motu to sync when motif becomes available?
[18:56] <ScottK> Elbrus: yes.
[18:57] <Elbrus> I think I already know somebody...
[18:59] <Elbrus> ScottK: actually, we are already slightly further in the packaging of motif (collab-maint), if I upload a newer version soon, would that also do?
[18:59] <ScottK> If you upload it to Debian, yes.
[18:59] <Elbrus> ok.
[23:19] <chilicuil> hi there, I'm trying to test a package on pbuilder, but I'm unable because pbuilder doesn't mount sysfs by default, do you know of any way to add sysfs to the fs pbuilder mounts?
[23:19] <RAOF> chilicuil: You could add it to the list of bind-mounts; I know how to do that with sbuild, but I've forgotten how to do that with pbuilder.
[23:20] <chilicuil> RAOF: thanks for the fast reply!, that's all need, I'll look further at it
[23:24] <maxb> ~/.pbuilderrc is a shell fragment, and is probably where you want to do this (unless you only want it as a one-off)
[23:28] <chilicuil> maxb: yep, I've edit it, the exact syntax was, BINDMOUNTS="/first/path /additional/path" , pretty simple =)