| hatch | Makyo: I was thinking the juju terminal console - wouldn't he be able to get it from there? Improv should be dumping that sort of stuff no? | 03:32 |
|---|---|---|
| === free`` is now known as free` | ||
| * mariusko thinks he hits bug #1149410 again... | 08:20 | |
| _mup_ | Bug #1149410: Stuck on "Trying to connect to the Juju environment" <juju-gui:Incomplete> <juju (Ubuntu):Incomplete> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/1149410 > | 08:20 |
| frankban | mariusko: what provider are you using? | 08:21 |
| frankban | mariusko: and what version of the GUI? | 08:22 |
| mariusko | frankban: AWS | 08:25 |
| mariusko | I changed back to a stable version. That is juju-api-branch: lp:~hazmat/juju/rapi-rollup and juju-gui-source: stable | 08:26 |
| mariusko | Worked for some time. I also sometimes have more success using IP address that DNS name | 08:26 |
| frankban | mariusko: you switched back to stable using "juju set"? | 08:53 |
| mariusko | frankban: nope, it was a new installation | 08:57 |
| mariusko | new deployment | 08:57 |
| frankban | mariusko: any javascript console errors? | 09:02 |
| mariusko | frankban: "Application Cache Error event: Master entry fetch failed (-1)" | 09:09 |
| frankban | mariusko: humm.. are you using chrome/chromium? | 09:10 |
| mariusko | frankban: chromium. Isn't FF still not supported? | 09:10 |
| frankban | mariusko: try to delete the appcache: go to chrome://appcache-internals/ and remove the entry corresponding to your ec2 machine | 09:17 |
| === andrewdeane is now known as awd | ||
| mariusko | frankban: same problem with FF. Python process on the machine is using a lot of CPU | 10:01 |
| mariusko | but it has 1,7 GB RAM | 10:02 |
| mariusko | "WebSocket connection to 'wss://x.x.x.x/ws' failed: WebSocket is closed before the connection is established" | 10:56 |
| mariusko | frankban: debugging further, /ws gives "503 Service Unavailable: No server is available to handle this request." | 11:02 |
| mariusko | I see that there is a haproxy there, and "http://127.0.0.1:8080/" gives nothing | 11:03 |
| mariusko | Uhm, even "/var/lib/juju" is gone on the server now | 11:06 |
| frankban | mariusko: any error in /var/log/upstart/juju-* | 11:44 |
| rick_h_ | did something change with the tests? The ones loading json are failing for me as the paths to the test/data/xxx seems to have changed? | 12:25 |
| rick_h_ | bah, some test is monkeying with the url adding a / to the end in chrome causing the paths to fail | 12:25 |
| frankban | rick_h_: make test-server works well for me in trunk | 12:29 |
| rick_h_ | frankban: yea, there's a test half way through that's adding a / after index.html and causes all the relative paths to test data files to be index.html/data/xxxx.json | 12:30 |
| rick_h_ | frankban: might be an interaction with chrome I've got here | 12:30 |
| rick_h_ | hmm, does it for me in test-prod as well though so must not be a chrome thing | 12:31 |
| rick_h_ | nvm, guess it's something in this branch. | 12:33 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: when you get a chance can you peek at/QA the button fix you noticed yesterday? https://codereview.appspot.com/8363043 | 12:43 |
| mariusko | frankban: killed the instance. Will check next time. New instance working. | 12:44 |
| frankban | mariusko: ack | 12:45 |
| bac | hatch: ping when you're around | 13:25 |
| rick_h_ | bac: looks like the branch yesterday went ok then? Caught the reviews after EOD. | 13:25 |
| bac | rick_h_: yeah, just doing some clean up | 13:26 |
| rick_h_ | bac: I didn't lead you too far astray when what they meant I hope? | 13:26 |
| rick_h_ | cool | 13:26 |
| bac | thanks for your advice | 13:26 |
| Makyo | hatch, re juju terminal/improv - that was a live install, not improv, but there is a chance the bootstrap node would have it in its logs; I don't know if that all gets logged. | 13:32 |
| Makyo | Also, frankban, last daily for the tablet just about bricked the thing, so I was screwing with that all yesterday, sorry I didn't get more review done; I'll do that first thing. | 13:36 |
| frankban | Makyo: no problem, and thanks. | 13:36 |
| * frankban fighting against allhands | 13:38 | |
| benji | hatch: do you need a review for "implement unexpose"? | 13:55 |
| hatch | benji yeah looks like i need one more | 13:57 |
| benji | hatch: I'll be glad to. I don't see the URL on the card, do you have it at hand? | 13:57 |
| hatch | https://codereview.appspot.com/8339044/ | 13:57 |
| hatch | thank yas | 13:57 |
| hatch | bac: I'm here | 13:58 |
| bac | hey hatch | 13:58 |
| bac | thanks for the excellent review. i only had one question about one of your comments. i think my question is in the review now. | 13:59 |
| hatch | alright lemme check | 13:59 |
| bac | first comment at https://codereview.appspot.com/8338043/diff/5001/app/store/endpoints.js#newcode24 | 13:59 |
| hatch | the endpoints map and subscriptions is the properties I was talking about - if you define them in the initializer then they are local to the instance not on the prototoype | 14:00 |
| hatch | that's what I mean | 14:00 |
| hatch | wrt 'following properties' | 14:00 |
| hatch | so judging from your comments you already did that | 14:02 |
| hatch | brb | 14:03 |
| bac | hatch: cool. please update the review if you think it is landable | 14:04 |
| hatch | bac: endpoints.js has a syntax error... | 14:17 |
| hatch | lol how did that get through the linter | 14:18 |
| hatch | ln 44 | 14:18 |
| bac | hatch: it is a style issue but not syntax i think | 14:20 |
| bac | fixed | 14:20 |
| hatch | oh right | 14:21 |
| hatch | that's what i meant :) | 14:21 |
| hatch | LGTM'd | 14:22 |
| bac | thx | 14:22 |
| bac | hatch: i still have an open question about reset as i'm unsure when that is called. | 14:22 |
| bac | hatch: should reset call unbind? | 14:23 |
| hatch | if there aren't any endpoints in there would you still want to listen to those events? | 14:25 |
| hatch | if reset calls unbind then you'll need to rebind them again no? | 14:26 |
| bac | yes | 14:30 |
| bac | i'll land as is and pick ben's brain later. | 14:31 |
| frankban | benji: do you have some notes re missing go watcher attrs? I am filing a bug I will work on after my current handlers/converters refactoring branch is merged | 14:35 |
| benji | frankban: I turned the ones I found into cards. | 14:36 |
| frankban | benji: are they in story 1? I cannot find them in the board | 14:39 |
| benji | frankban: I only found two and one is done now. | 14:39 |
| benji | perhaps you found a treasure trove of missing data that I missed. | 14:40 |
| frankban | benji: no, I am just trying to figure out what's missing. | 14:43 |
| hatch | rick_h_: is huw using OSX and that's why he can't lbox? | 14:53 |
| frankban | benji: do you have a minute for a quick call? | 14:58 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: no, he's had a few diff errors. A couple look like LP timeouts. Another was just problem figuring our linting. CSS rules matching xxx_yyy vs xxx-yyy don't actually output a message | 14:58 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: so he's just not spent time figuring it all out so he's getting a pass | 14:58 |
| benji | frankban: sure | 14:59 |
| benji | frankban: the normal hangout? | 14:59 |
| frankban | benji: yes, I am there | 14:59 |
| benji | frankban: hold on, the Google hangouts plugin isn't working | 15:00 |
| hatch | rick_h_: ahh ok | 15:01 |
| hatch | rick_h_: I'm a little confused as to why we are using images for that add button - I don't see anything there that coudln't be done with a icon font and some css | 15:05 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: I'm not sure at all. Since we're getting .pngs from UX I'm not sure if it's a time thing to pull it out or if there's something about it. We can bring it up. | 15:06 |
| hatch | alright thanks - yeah because that's 3 http requests right there which could be one icon font and some css | 15:07 |
| hatch | I'll approve it but just make a note please :) | 15:08 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: will add a discussion card to our board | 15:09 |
| hatch | (Y) | 15:09 |
| hatch | oh look at that CI broke | 15:11 |
| bac | benji: reviewed your branch. | 15:22 |
| benji | bac: the go-juju one? | 15:22 |
| hatch | oh hmm, doesn't look like I can actually do destroy_service until remove_relation is done | 15:22 |
| bac | benji: yep | 15:22 |
| benji | bac: is your review "binding" (i.e., can I count it as my second review? please say yes, please say yes...) | 15:23 |
| bac | guihelp: i had a pre-existing committment at noon today before we changed our meeting time. i'm going to have to miss the meeting today. | 15:23 |
| hatch | :'( | 15:23 |
| bac | benji: sure. i'll be happy to LGTM it when fixed | 15:24 |
| Makyo | bac, alright. Anything about your current work we ought to know? | 15:24 |
| bac | Makyo: it is stellar | 15:24 |
| frankban | :-) | 15:24 |
| Makyo | \o/ | 15:24 |
| benji | bac: what I mean is, are we appoved as full reviewers for go-juju? | 15:24 |
| bac | Makyo: branch landed. doing misc stuff right now (lp2kanban, reviews, etc) before picking up another item after lunch | 15:24 |
| bac | benji: yes, that is my understanding | 15:24 |
| Makyo | bac, sounds good. | 15:25 |
| benji | excellent | 15:25 |
| bac | Makyo: i'm open to suggestions on what to do next if the crowd has ideas | 15:25 |
| bac | benji: the times i've prefaced reviews with "i'm not an official reviewer" the juju-core guys pushed back and said "you're good enough" | 15:25 |
| hatch | bcsaller: are you in yet? | 15:25 |
| benji | k | 15:26 |
| bac | benji: why the lack of tests on that branch? | 15:26 |
| benji | bac: I'm confused. It has tests, not many, but it doesn't do much and it follows the same pattern as the other branches that do similar things. | 15:27 |
| bcsaller | hatch: yes, mostly | 15:27 |
| bac | benji: did i miss something? i just saw the one api_test | 15:28 |
| bac | i may have missed it due to multiple revisions on the rietveld | 15:28 |
| hatch | bcsaller: ok I THINK the order I need to do things are... add_relation > remove_relation > destroy_service | 15:28 |
| hatch | because you can't destroy a service unless it has no relations | 15:28 |
| hatch | and you need to be able to remove the relations if it has some | 15:28 |
| hatch | but you can't remove any if you haven't added any | 15:28 |
| hatch | yay TDD | 15:29 |
| hatch | :D | 15:29 |
| benji | bac: yep, that's probably all there is; for better or worse that is what has been deemed acceptable. | 15:29 |
| hatch | bcsaller: so what I"m asking is if that order of events makes sense to you | 15:29 |
| bac | benji: ok. i expecte to see something in statecmd. but, as you say, it doesn't do much. | 15:29 |
| bac | "expecte" -- it's like i'm speaking french now | 15:30 |
| Makyo | expecté | 15:31 |
| bcsaller | hatch: that makes sense to me. | 15:31 |
| hatch | word | 15:31 |
| hatch | these look like large tasks | 15:31 |
| bcsaller | hatch: they kind of are, my stuff turned out to be bigger than I thought. W/o relying on the validation juju does (for improv) there is quite a bit to check on any mutation | 15:32 |
| bcsaller | hatch: I need to finish the ones I'm doing but I'm open to pairing on it later if you want that | 15:33 |
| hatch | well last night I was dabbling in some C# so I'm glad to be back in javascript...:) | 15:33 |
| hatch | c# has 4 different 'length' methods depending what type of array you have....cuz that makes sense | 15:34 |
| hatch | :P | 15:35 |
| hatch | although the most irritating is the fact that methods AND classes have an uppercase first letter so you have no idea what can be instantiated by looking at the name | 15:38 |
| benji | bac: I have fixed the errors you pointed out and re-proposed the branch. (https://codereview.appspot.com/8366043) | 15:54 |
| frankban | guihelp: the javascript console (trunk) shows this error when double clicking a service: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/5677068/ | 15:54 |
| hatch | that looks like an error caused by bac's changes | 15:55 |
| bcsaller | indeed | 15:55 |
| hatch | bac are you still around? | 15:55 |
| teknico | oh dear gjslint, why do you explode rather than telling what it is that you actually don't like? | 15:56 |
| hatch | frankban: maybe create a ticket and assign to bac so he can fix when he returns? | 15:56 |
| teknico | it's not good for your health, you know | 15:56 |
| frankban | hatch: will do | 15:57 |
| hatch | jujugui guichat in 2 | 15:57 |
| === deryck is now known as deryck[lunch] | ||
| Makyo | bcsaller, rick_h_, luca____ ping | 16:01 |
| teknico | https://codereview.appspot.com/8345046 | 16:10 |
| hatch | teknico: I'll take one | 16:14 |
| teknico | hatch, thanks! | 16:14 |
| hatch | done | 16:18 |
| teknico | hatch, thanks! (remember to tag yourself on the card, actually *before* you make a review :-) ) | 16:21 |
| teknico | speaking of which: benji, did you say you already got two reviews for your branch? I see no tags on its card | 16:21 |
| hatch | tagged | 16:22 |
| teknico | (playing card tag police here :-) ) | 16:22 |
| teknico | hatch, thanks again :-) | 16:22 |
| benji | teknico: only one of the reviewers is on the gui team, the juju-core guys don't use that technique. | 16:23 |
| benji | my self-imposed rule is that only reviews for projects completely "inside" the gui team use tags to claim reviews | 16:23 |
| teknico | benji, but bac said that we can be authoritative reviewers on juju-core too, so why not? | 16:24 |
| teknico | I mean, we could add tags for reviews from the juju-core team in their place | 16:24 |
| benji | if we can get them to participate, then it would be great; partial participation seems worse than non-participation though | 16:24 |
| benji | we could do that | 16:25 |
| teknico | Makyo, thank you too (I added your tag :-) ), landing! | 16:27 |
| Makyo | teknico, good catch, thanks | 16:27 |
| hatch | that moment when you realize you just deleted the wrong folder... | 16:51 |
| teknico | yeah, that one :-) | 16:53 |
| hatch | in python `for pair in endpoint_pairs[1:]:` what does the : inside the [] mean? | 17:13 |
| === deryck[lunch] is now known as deryck | ||
| benji | hatch: that : makes it a slice, so [1, 2, 3, 4][1:] == [2, 3, 4] | 17:19 |
| bac | oy | 17:19 |
| hatch | ahh ok | 17:19 |
| hatch | thanks | 17:19 |
| benji | the first index goes before and a second index goes after, if the first is left off it means 0, if the last is left off it means -1 (last) | 17:19 |
| hatch | bac: https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-gui/+bug/1164589 | 17:20 |
| _mup_ | Bug #1164589: addServiceToEndpointsMap error <juju-gui:Triaged> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/1164589 > | 17:20 |
| * bac looking | 17:20 | |
| hatch | bac: just updated with a new comment on that ticket | 17:24 |
| hatch | bac: that error is actually blocking me so I can help if needed | 17:27 |
| bac | hatch: first one was easy. looking into the other | 17:27 |
| hatch | oh ok excellent - be sure to now write a test to cover that error :) | 17:28 |
| bac | hatch: yes dear | 17:32 |
| hatch | lol | 17:32 |
| bac | hatch: after the fix for the first i cannot replicate the add relation issue | 17:32 |
| hatch | egggggggcelent | 17:32 |
| hatch | is there a special procedure for staff purchases from shop.canonical.com? | 17:34 |
| BradCrittenden | hatch: re: purchases - no. if they are still doing the discount code, you should've gotten it when joining. | 18:11 |
| === BradCrittenden is now known as bac | ||
| bac | hatch: proposing fix now | 18:18 |
| hatch | kewl | 18:21 |
| hatch | thanks | 18:21 |
| hatch | hehe fix-goof | 18:26 |
| hatch | bac: a 4 character fix? hehe | 18:34 |
| BradCrittenden | i think it is eight. i had to delete 'null' before adding 'this' | 18:34 |
| === BradCrittenden is now known as bac | ||
| hatch | oh lol - charmStore needs to be destroyed no? | 18:35 |
| hatch | in your test | 18:35 |
| hatch | no codereview url has come by so that's why I mentioned in here :) | 18:38 |
| bac | https://codereview.appspot.com/8364044 | 18:39 |
| bac | hatch: could you qa this branch to see if you can cause the add relation failure? | 18:39 |
| hatch | yep checking it out now | 18:41 |
| rick_h_ | jcsackett: hatch if you guys get a few min please? https://codereview.appspot.com/8356044 it's a step one so you can qa it that it works, but it's fugly and only works via direct url calls (can't click into the view) | 18:42 |
| bac | benji, rick_h_ : could one of you do a quick review on https://codereview.appspot.com/8364044 | 18:43 |
| rick_h_ | bac: sure thing, loading up | 18:43 |
| bac | thx | 18:43 |
| hatch | bac, QA'd and OK | 18:43 |
| benji | missed it | 18:43 |
| bac | thanks hatch | 18:43 |
| hatch | rick_h_: I still don't see a position absolute in this branch :P | 18:45 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: nope :) | 18:45 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: honestly, last thing we'll do. This way we know any bugs are our own and not interactions | 18:45 |
| rick_h_ | well, maybe not last... | 18:45 |
| benji | bac: if you get a second, I could use a +1 on the review from earlier | 18:46 |
| bac | benji: done | 18:48 |
| rick_h_ | bac done | 18:48 |
| hatch | rick_h_: so no more issues with the routing code? | 18:49 |
| bac | thanks rick_h_ | 18:49 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: :/ only issue is the double/triple call which I'm ignoring for now | 18:49 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: goal is to try to get the basics setup for huw to go through and be able to apply UX love to things | 18:49 |
| hatch | oh yeah but that was an issue long before the routing stuff | 18:49 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: ah, well I wasn't really involved before so meh | 18:49 |
| hatch | neither was I :P | 18:50 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: I do forsee one issue I need to work through, but haven't looked awt the problem much yet | 18:50 |
| rick_h_ | I really wish I had a way to generate urls in handlebars based on something with some brains on current state | 18:50 |
| rick_h_ | because if I do the url routing in my views by catching click events I don't get dispatch | 18:50 |
| rick_h_ | but in the templates there's no reall app state to say "oh, you're in /fullscreen so all links should stay in /fullscreen land | 18:51 |
| hatch | rick_h_: create a helper which references the generator in the router code | 18:57 |
| hatch | I generate urls that way in the service views | 18:57 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: cool, will look there then. | 18:57 |
| hatch | but instead of using a helper I do it before passing it in | 18:57 |
| rick_h_ | oh cool, yea dirty thing would be for the master view to set an magic ATTR that's 'whoami' or something but it's nasty/dirty | 18:58 |
| hatch | serviceRemoteUri: this.get('nsRouter').url({ gui: '/service/'}) | 18:58 |
| hatch | for example | 18:58 |
| hatch | so that says, change the url for the gui namespace to /service/ | 18:58 |
| hatch | well....build me a url with the gui namespace with /service/ | 18:59 |
| rick_h_ | hmm, yea the big thing will be the CharmToken widget, when clicked on, will need to open /bws/XXXX/precise/charmid to load the details | 19:00 |
| rick_h_ | in sidebar, that's this expanded sidebar version, in fullscreen, it's the fullscreen details view | 19:01 |
| rick_h_ | where sidebar/fullscreen is XXXXX | 19:01 |
| rick_h_ | so need to get something into the CharmToken Widget to be smart about generating that url/click | 19:01 |
| hatch | yup | 19:01 |
| rick_h_ | thanks bac | 19:06 |
| rick_h_ | bac: so in testnig it out YUIDoc doesn't care about the lack of return. The methods don't return anything and rather than add more noise with the whole mutates only mess I just leave it out. | 19:10 |
| rick_h_ | at least make code-doc and make view-code-doc don't complain | 19:10 |
| bac | rick_h_: that is great news and should be shouted from some mountain top or roof | 19:10 |
| * hatch is back on track | 19:15 | |
| hatch | thanks for the patch bac | 19:15 |
| hatch | bcsaller: have a second to explain to me how relationships work from the higher level? I see the code but I'm wondering how they function inside each charm....or if this is documented somewhere I could read that instead :) | 19:20 |
| bcsaller | hatch, one min | 19:21 |
| hatch | sure | 19:24 |
| bcsaller | hatch: in hangout | 19:24 |
| bac | statik signed on at Mar 10, 2013 20:37:57 and has been idle for 594hr 59min 51s | 19:44 |
| bac | i guess i'll try email | 19:44 |
| hatch | lol | 19:47 |
| hatch | bcsaller: so that I am sure I get this right | 19:50 |
| hatch | relationships are valid if | 19:50 |
| hatch | they are the same type... | 19:50 |
| hatch | one is client, one is server | 19:50 |
| hatch | both are 'peer' | 19:50 |
| hatch | I'm not sure how peer to peer differs from 'both same type' but they are checked for separately | 19:52 |
| bcsaller | hatch: at a high level yes, there is also a notion of subordinate scoped relations which have the same basic rules but generally use an implicitly provided relation, 'juju-info' | 19:52 |
| bcsaller | hatch: with client-server, one is client, the other is server (roles) and they have the same interface type | 19:53 |
| bcsaller | hatch: with peer they are peers, they all have the same role | 19:53 |
| hatch | ahh ok | 19:53 |
| bcsaller | hatch: the special behavior around peer relations is that they are automatically joined on deploy | 19:54 |
| bcsaller | hatch: there is no explicit step needed because they are 'related to self' | 19:55 |
| bcsaller | hatch: you can see that at the bottom of juju/control/deploy.py | 19:55 |
| bcsaller | (which I don't know if we implement in our version) | 19:56 |
| hatch | doesn't look like it | 19:56 |
| bcsaller | nope | 19:56 |
| bac | hatch: did you do anything to fix jenkins or was it not a real failure? | 19:56 |
| * bac trying to get all set up with vpn, etc | 19:57 | |
| hatch | there was a lot of work done to do all this in python to throw it all away and redo in go... | 19:57 |
| rick_h_ | bac: I think my land came alnog after yours and forced a re-run? | 19:57 |
| hatch | bac: I just left it, I'll do it towards the EOD | 19:57 |
| rick_h_ | bac: but guessing as I thuoght the failure on yours was mine | 19:57 |
| hatch | rick_h_: no it complets and then does it again, it doesn't stop | 19:57 |
| rick_h_ | see, what do I know about how it's setup? nadda :) | 19:58 |
| bac | hatch: so we assume the failure was spurious/canonistack | 19:58 |
| bcsaller | hatch: we really need to fix our use-cases for this thing, we don't want to build all the juju behavior in JS I think, just get the env running | 19:58 |
| hatch | bac: I'm going to yes - there is no reason any of our changes have caused that failure | 19:58 |
| bcsaller | but it still takes alot to get just as far as we need | 19:59 |
| hatch | bcsaller: yeah - how I understood it is that we want it to 'look' like it's working as expected | 19:59 |
| hatch | so I'm sure we can forego some of the more complex checks | 20:00 |
| hatch | but I am pretty sure we want to check to make sure the relation stuff works properly | 20:00 |
| bcsaller | hatch: yeah, its one of the main things we draw | 20:01 |
| hatch | bcsaller: mind taking a look in topology/relation.js and let me know if I am seeing this wrong...It looks like we only support server and client connections in the GUI? 625-631 and 659-665 | 20:10 |
| bcsaller | hatch: peer relations are not ambiguous which is what that method is checking | 20:19 |
| bcsaller | hatch: we dont' draw peer relations though as they would look like an arrow pointing back to self or a ring or something. | 20:20 |
| hatch | well sure but that's the only method which actually calls add_relation | 20:26 |
| hatch | so right now the gui doesn't actually check the charm to see if it's a server or client | 20:26 |
| hatch | it just says "you're a client, and you're a server" | 20:27 |
| bac | hatch: i'm trying to setup my vpn to the qa lab. you know the drill, right? | 20:27 |
| hatch | bac: umm mine was a little different because I'm using 12.10 | 20:28 |
| hatch | so I coudln't follow the guide | 20:28 |
| bac | hatch: that's what i'm using | 20:28 |
| hatch | oh ok, lemme boot up my laptop | 20:28 |
| bac | hatch: well, real, quick, once you have network-manager set up, how do you get it to open the vpn connection? | 20:29 |
| hatch | click the network symbol in the top right | 20:29 |
| bac | if i double-click on it, then it just opens the edit configuration dialog | 20:29 |
| bac | top right of what? | 20:30 |
| hatch | nope single click on the thing that looks like a cell phone signal strength (with my icon set) then go down to 'VPN Connections' | 20:30 |
| hatch | in the very top right of the screen | 20:30 |
| bac | ok, i was trying w/in the nm | 20:30 |
| hatch | then that will open up another menu that has whatever you called the vpn connection | 20:30 |
| hatch | do you see it? | 20:31 |
| hatch | honestly my configuration is so messed up I don't think I'll ever be able to upgrade to 13.04 without something exploding :D | 20:32 |
| hatch | this was also installed with wubi 3 years ago and without wubi in 13.04 I'm not sure I'll actually be able to upgrade anyways | 20:32 |
| bac | hatch: cool, i'm in | 20:33 |
| hatch | right on | 20:35 |
| hatch | plz don't delete our jenkins configuration :) | 20:35 |
| hatch | LG Optimus G at my cell provider is $0 on a 3 year contract....or $499 on a two year...lol | 20:45 |
| hatch | bcsaller: I need the mysql equiv to test/data/wordpress-charmdata.json any idea how I would generate that? | 20:49 |
| bcsaller | hatch: http://jujucharms.com/charms/precise/mysql has everything | 20:51 |
| bcsaller | hatch: under the repo link you can find the interfaces in metadata.yaml (same as for any charm) but they are also spelled out on the website | 20:52 |
| hatch | ok so that json file was manually created? | 20:53 |
| hatch | must be, I can't find any file which has all of this information in it | 20:57 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: what file are you looking for? | 20:58 |
| hatch | well I need to deploy mysql along side wordpress in the in memory environment tests | 20:58 |
| hatch | so I am guessing I need the mysql version of test/data/wordpress-charmdata.json | 20:58 |
| rick_h_ | k, let me look what api endpoint that is on charmworld | 20:59 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: http://jujucharms.com/charms/precise/mysql/json | 21:00 |
| hatch | oh lol it was that easy eh | 21:00 |
| hatch | :) | 21:00 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: and that's called from the model.load() using the 'charmstore' store | 21:01 |
| hatch | kewl | 21:11 |
| hatch | pro...gress | 21:12 |
| hatch | bcsaller: reviewing | 22:12 |
| bcsaller | hatch: thanks :) | 22:12 |
| hatch | review done | 22:40 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!