[05:41] <slangasek> hi, is there anyone around who can explain to me how I should be preparing merges for compiz (or point me to documentation)?  I prepared a branch which bzr unhelpfully auto-proposed to the wrong branch (https://code.launchpad.net/~vorlon/compiz/lp.763148/+merge/157534); but I'm not sure which branch I should even be basing off of
[05:44] <slangasek> looks as though lp:compiz/0.9.9 has been recently updated, perhaps that's what I should be targeting?
[09:04] <smspillaz> slangasek: around ?
[09:05] <slangasek> smspillaz: ish :)
[09:05] <smspillaz> slangasek: coolio. Yeah, as stated in my comments you'll need to target lp:compiz (lp:~compiz-team/compiz/0.9.10)
[09:05] <slangasek> smspillaz: is that not where the resubmit went?
[09:06] <smspillaz> might be, I haven't had a chance to check mails recently
[09:06] <slangasek> seems to be targeted right to me in the resubmit
[09:06] <slangasek> ok
[09:06] <smspillaz> ah, looks like it has
[09:06] <smspillaz> slangasek: to be honest, I think the method name thing is not really a big deal, so I'll give it a thumbs up for now
[09:06] <slangasek> cool
[09:07] <smspillaz> slangasek: considering the fact that I'll need to probably remove MockScreenSizeChangeObject entirely and replace it with something better
[09:07] <slangasek> right :)
[09:07] <smspillaz> yeah, the code is a mess
[09:07] <smspillaz> mea culpa
[09:08] <smspillaz> slangasek: for the record, once we get your changes merged, I plan on splitting up the giant "ScreenSizeChange" test into multiple tests each with one assert only
[09:08] <smspillaz> and then probably moving test-related data into the fixtures etc
[09:09] <slangasek> sounds fine to me
[09:09] <smspillaz> I'll sub you on the review once I get on to it
[09:09] <slangasek> ok
[09:09] <smspillaz> just need to finish the first draft of this essay
[09:09] <slangasek> :-)
[12:33] <popey> smspillaz: any idea what may be causing bug 1162093
[12:33] <ubot5> bug 1162093 in Unity "Unity broken after latest update; compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in getCompPluginVTable20090315_unityshell()" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1162093
[12:33] <popey> (or additional info needed?)
[12:33] <smspillaz> ABI bump somewhere
[12:33] <popey> ahh
[12:34] <smspillaz> though I don't think anything broke the ABI anywhere
[12:34] <smspillaz> let me check
[12:34] <smspillaz> popey: btw, it could also *not* be an ABI bump, but a missing symbol
[12:34] <popey> i have a dupe of that bug which has apport stuff attached
[12:34] <smspillaz> in fact, it probably is
[12:34] <smspillaz> run compiz --replace --debug ccp &
[12:34] <popey> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1165412
[12:34] <ubot5> Error: launchpad bug 1165412 not found
[12:37] <smspillaz> popey: only thing I can think of is this one: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~compiz-team/compiz/0.9.10/revision/3639, though I'm pretty sure a revision went into unity not too long ago to remove any reference to the deprecated API
[12:37] <popey> smspillaz: http://paste.ubuntu.com/5686051
[12:37] <smspillaz> cheers
[12:37] <smspillaz> popey: okay, so not a compiz bug :)
[12:37] <smspillaz> compiz (core) - Debug: dlopen failed: /usr/lib/libunity-core-6.0.so.5: undefined symbol: unity_protocol_music_preview_pause_uri
[12:37] <popey> \o/
[12:38] <popey> Off the hook this time Spillaz!
[12:38] <smspillaz> we really need to fix the crash that obfuscates these missing symbol errors
[12:42] <smspillaz> ...
[12:42] <smspillaz> every time I look at bugs.launchpad.net/compiz/ I get really depressed
[12:48] <smspillaz> popey: okay, so something totally unrelated
[12:48] <smspillaz> popey: there is this really weird thing I noticed the other day, and I have no idea why it happens
[12:48] <smspillaz> popey: but say if you have compiz loaded with just "move" "resize" "composite" "opengl" "decor"
[12:49] <smspillaz> if you use compizconfig to only enable those plugins with the gsettings backend
[12:49] <smspillaz> window movement is like noticably more jittery than it is with the ini backend
[12:49] <smspillaz> its /really/ weird
[12:49] <smspillaz> completely same settings on both
[12:49] <smspillaz> I have no idea why that happens
[12:49] <popey> that makes no sense
[12:49] <smspillaz> I know right?
[12:49] <smspillaz> we don't even touch gsettings at runtime
[12:50] <smspillaz> (unless we're reading from a gsettings key)
[12:50] <smspillaz> however, we cache all that stuff inside of compiz until it changes
[12:51] <smspillaz> popey: I was wondering, if you have the time, can you maybe confirm this? I have the feeling that my mind is playing tricks on me
[12:51] <smspillaz> ... or now that I've told you your mind will play tricks too ..
[12:51] <smspillaz> ..... maybe do a double blind test with someone else
[12:52] <popey> sure
[12:52] <popey> can you ping me a mail with the steps I need to do and I'll certainly try it on my nvidia and intel boxes
[12:52] <smspillaz> there needs to be a way to set breakpoints in gdb for like "break whenever we go inside libgio"
[12:52] <smspillaz> sure
[12:58] <popey> back to gnome shell till this is fixed for me ☹
[17:56] <slangasek> smspillaz: so do you know what the process would be for getting these changes cherry-picked to 0.9.9 for raring?
=== thomi_ is now known as thomi
[21:53] <popey> slangasek: bergma would be the person whose list you need to add it to I believe.
[22:07] <slangasek> popey: no such nick / launchpad account?
[22:19] <popey> slangasek: typo, sorry, https://launchpad.net/~bregma
[22:20] <slangasek> bregma: ping
[22:20] <slangasek> popey: ok :)