[02:29] <Aaron> hello i have a question.... since my cloacks was "Timido" and now it's aaron. but i cannot use the email address for my user example aaron@ubuntu.com any hints. or tips?
[02:30] <wgrant> Aaron: Your @ubuntu.com email address is based on your Launchpad username, not your freenode cloak.
[02:30] <wgrant> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuEmail
[02:30] <Aaron> wgrant, what i want it to change it.... is it possible?
[02:30] <Aaron> i know that.... ;(
[02:30] <Aaron> thank you....
[10:26] <frankb_> hi all
[10:27] <frankb_> why is it not possible actually to upload a file which size is 175M. The maximum is set to 200M.
[10:27] <frankb_> The request is falling in timeout.
[10:29] <wgrant> frankb_: Can you try from an Internet connection with more upstream bandwidth?
[10:31] <frankb_> I was at home when i tried to upload my file and I can't do it from work
[12:48] <zyga> hi
[12:49] <zyga> is it possible to upload binary-only third party executables to launchpad (as a source package) ppa
[12:49] <zyga> the executable litsel is accompanied by this document: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/5689307/
[12:50] <zyga> it's not explicitly covered by https://help.launchpad.net/PPATermsofUse
[12:53] <zyga> I wonder if there is any similary to packages that are a part of restricted repository
[12:53] <zyga> binary drivers, ec
[12:53] <zyga> etc
[12:55] <dobey> zyga: i think it probably fails the restricted/main test, becasue it requires you to contact the author if you want to distribute via "cd/dvd or other bundles"
[12:55] <zyga> dobey: oh, good point
[12:55] <wgrant> The restriction against being sold is also problematic
[12:56] <zyga> dobey: thank you very much
[12:56] <dobey> and that
[12:56] <zyga> thanks, I think that settles it
[12:56] <wgrant> You certainly can't upload it under the PPA Terms of Use
[12:56] <zyga> right
[12:56] <dobey> you can, i guess, perhaps do what the flash package does (download it from orig source on install, rather than redistribute)
[12:56] <zyga> yes, we've considered that already
[12:57] <zyga> sadly it's not possible in the specific use case (it would not be of value for us then)
[12:57] <dobey> why is that?
[12:58] <zyga> dobey: being a part of a deb-based offline bundle that one can install and perform some testing
[13:00] <zyga> so the case gets interesting
[13:00] <zyga> apparently we're in touch with the author and got his consent to package it in a deb file
[13:00] <zyga> I wonder what kind of legal document / license would we need to obtain, in written form, to put this in a PPA
[13:01] <zyga> would the very same license, sans the bundle/sale clause work?
[13:01] <dobey> you'd need the restriction on sale, and/or cd/dvd bundling removed i'd guess
[13:01] <zyga> ok, that's a start then
[13:01] <zyga> thanks
[13:02] <wgrant> zyga: It needs to comply with http://www.ubuntu.com/project/about-ubuntu/licensing
[13:02] <wgrant> Or just open source the thing ;)
[13:02] <zyga> heh
[13:02] <zyga> I'd wish he did
[13:02] <zyga> wgrant: thanks, that will be our guideline
[13:03] <dobey> open source would be good. because then at least you could also build it on 32 bit
[16:49] <RabidCicada> Hey there fella's.  Is there a way to edit your bug submissions?...I've only found I can add more (error containing comments) rather than correcting the old one.  Am I missing something?
[16:49] <RabidCicada> my searching on launchpad help and FAQ's are not turning up any answers either
[16:53] <czajkowski> you cna edit the summary
[16:53] <czajkowski> RabidCicada: what bug in particular
[16:56] <RabidCicada> #1166211 tools/xen/install_os_domU.sh Fail with enable_service() call. <https://bugs.launchpad.net/devstack/+bug/1166211>
[16:56] <RabidCicada> I ended up adding more comments
[16:56] <RabidCicada> but it would be cleaner for me to just edit the original
[16:56] <RabidCicada> and keep it concise
[16:57] <czajkowski> RabidCicada: can you not just click the pencil icon around the bug description
[16:57] <czajkowski> that changes that
[16:57] <czajkowski> the same appears for the bug title
[16:58] <RabidCicada> ok...I can edit hte bug description but not the comments?
[16:58] <czajkowski> no not a comment
[16:58] <RabidCicada> I can edit the attachment to the comments...just not the comment body itself
[16:59] <RabidCicada> ahhh...ok....Same for attachments?...As in people are going to have to look at every comment to get the attachments I want with the main bug description?
[16:59] <RabidCicada> or do attachments appear in a unified location from different view?
[17:00] <czajkowski> thye view them from there
[17:01] <RabidCicada> to make sure I understand "they must scan all comments that happen to have attachments to get the attachment"
[17:01] <RabidCicada> so...make sure I put everything I want in the main description/comment...and don't forget stuff too many times
[17:02] <czajkowski> RabidCicada: yes exactly, ever time you comment on the bug
[17:02] <czajkowski> all that list of people down the side may get notified if they have notifications turned on
[17:02] <RabidCicada> ahh...ok.
[17:02] <RabidCicada> Thanks...relatively new...and thought it was wierd you cannot fix typos etc
[17:02] <RabidCicada> in comments