| === mmrazik is now known as mmrazik|afk | ||
| === henrix_ is now known as henrix | ||
| === mmrazik is now known as mmrazik|afk | ||
| === doko_ is now known as doko | ||
| === highvolt1ge is now known as highvoltage | ||
| jamespage | please could rtslib be demoted back to universe | 12:36 |
|---|---|---|
| cjwatson | jamespage: done | 12:39 |
| jamespage | thanks cjwatson | 12:40 |
| jamespage | doko, tomcat7 and jenkins both fixed fyi | 13:24 |
| doko | jamespage, already accepted =) | 13:24 |
| jamespage | so I see :-) | 13:25 |
| doko | infinity, did you look at the newlib ftbfs? | 13:29 |
| jamespage | doko, that jenkins update fixes the other two jenkins-* ftbfs as well | 13:30 |
| doko | ok, will give them back later | 13:30 |
| jamespage | doko, ta | 13:31 |
| doko | jamespage, I did subscribe you for review of my ecj update | 13:33 |
| jamespage | doko, lemme take a look | 13:33 |
| doko | Riddell, ScottK: uploaded a hack for the qt-assistant-compat ftbfs. but if you want to track this down properly ... | 13:44 |
| Riddell | thanks doko | 13:44 |
| doko | Riddell, should I accept it? | 13:44 |
| Riddell | doko: tracked down pykde issue, patch added to pyqt by someone | 13:44 |
| apw | looking to sync eventstat for QA use for power testing and the like, is unseeded | 14:00 |
| === fginther` is now known as fginther | ||
| cyphermox | hi, could someone please review https://bugs.launchpad.net/autopilot-qt/+bug/1157697 ? we'd like to add a package to ship the new unit and integration tests being added to autopilot-qt, so that they can be reused | 14:39 |
| ubot2` | Launchpad bug 1157697 in autopilot-qt "[FFE] autopilot-qt lacks testing" [Critical,In progress] | 14:39 |
| dobey | can i get anyone to look at the freeze request on bug #1151621 ? | 15:06 |
| ubot2` | Launchpad bug 1151621 in Ubuntu Software Center stable-5-6 "[UIFe] TypeError when opening edit menu" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1151621 | 15:06 |
| dobey | or i need to attach a debdiff? | 15:07 |
| === stgraber_ is now known as stgraber | ||
| Ursinha | stgraber, infinity, hey guys, is our call now or in one hour or so? | 16:12 |
| stgraber | Ursinha: not sure, though I'm not supposed to be around today (day off) and will be leaving for the airport in a few minutes | 16:13 |
| stgraber | Can someone from ubuntu-release review bug 1166286? | 16:13 |
| ubot2` | Launchpad bug 1166286 in lxc (Ubuntu) "[FFe] LXC 0.9 final" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1166286 | 16:13 |
| Ursinha | stgraber, ah, safe travels :) | 16:14 |
| stgraber | I mentioned this when asking for the 0.9~rc1 FFe, final is now there and is ready for upload. If this gets approved in the next 45min I can even get this uploaded before I switch continent and become unreachable for a few days. | 16:14 |
| infinity | Ursinha: I think the later time is the right one, though it'll be cutting it close with a doctor's appointment I have, so I might end up skipping it too. | 16:18 |
| infinity | stgraber: Looks good to me, go for it. | 16:19 |
| stgraber | infinity: thanks | 16:19 |
| Ursinha | infinity, that's right, I talked to cjwatson already and pgraner won't be around as well, maybe there's no point having a call this week | 16:21 |
| Ursinha | ccccccbfuiiktniktllkncrlvuhlnvrnjgbutjvticbi | 16:21 |
| Ursinha | argh, sorry | 16:21 |
| infinity | My Portuguese is a bit weak, I'm not sure what that means. | 16:22 |
| infinity | cjwatson / slangasek: In light of pgraner getting remarried by Elvis, stgraber being on an airplane, and me being prodded by medical professionals, you may want to cancel the sync call. Or have a friendly gathering of three people. Your call. | 16:24 |
| cjwatson | Heh, we just figured we'd cancel | 16:24 |
| cjwatson | I'm mostly swearing at ghc today anyway | 16:25 |
| cjwatson | As well as a prototype that Steve asked me for, not release-relevant | 16:25 |
| cjwatson | infinity: Did you end up needing to brutalise publish-release any more at the end of last week? I didn't see any patches | 16:26 |
| infinity | cjwatson: I mangled publish-image-set, didn't do anything to publish-release. | 16:27 |
| infinity | cjwatson: publish-release DOES fail in dry-run though. | 16:27 |
| cjwatson | Oh, yes, you said something about that | 16:27 |
| infinity | cjwatson: I just opted for not caring at the time, since it worked fine otherwise. | 16:28 |
| infinity | cjwatson: It tries to write out the html/htaccess bits even when dry. Probably just needs the whole thing wrapped in a big "if: nu uh", unless you want some pretty "would be doing" output. | 16:28 |
| cjwatson | Yeah, that's easily fixed | 16:29 |
| cjwatson | I've got a self.do wrapper method for that kind of thing | 16:29 |
| cjwatson | infinity: fixed, r1236 | 16:32 |
| infinity | Cheers. | 16:32 |
| doko | jamespage, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rtslib/2.1.fb27.isreally.2.1-0ubuntu1/+build/4477711 | 17:41 |
| doko | Missing build dependencies: python-simpleparse | 17:42 |
| bdmurray | .disk/info on a live cd still says Alpha fwiw | 17:50 |
| jamespage | doko, it needs demoting to universe | 17:57 |
| doko | jamespage, ahh, was already in raring, but not -proposed | 18:14 |
| === james_ is now known as Guest53945 | ||
| apw | infinity, as per our discussion i have uploaded a linux-lowlatency/linux-meta-lowlatency pair for raring | 19:58 |
| apw | thanks for keeping up queuebot :) | 20:01 |
| dobey | should i just upload something that's pending approval for UIFe in raring to proposed? | 20:34 |
| doko | UIFe? | 20:34 |
| dobey | apw: yay, maybe i can finally switch back to the lowlat kernel now :) | 20:34 |
| antarus | slangasek: is there actual documentation for these /usr/share/pam-configs and I'm jus missing it? | 20:46 |
| antarus | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PAMConfigFrameworkSpec is rather...sparse? | 20:47 |
| slangasek | antarus: that's the documentation, such as it is | 20:47 |
| slangasek | antarus: there's a need for better documentation in the package, which I haven't done yet. What's your question? | 20:47 |
| antarus | so we have...I'll call them 'complicated' pam configurations | 20:48 |
| antarus | right now they are all puppet templates, and we just do everything 'wrong' | 20:48 |
| antarus | so auth-type is sort of like 'required vs optional' ? | 20:49 |
| antarus | and what is the difference between 'auth' and 'auth-initial' ? | 20:49 |
| doko | h | 20:49 |
| antarus | just some sort of ordering? | 20:49 |
| doko | oops | 20:49 |
| antarus | slangasek: I guess one more important question; this only affects common-* right? | 20:52 |
| antarus | slangasek: is there no way to specific a per-service pam offering? | 20:53 |
| dobey | doko: sorry, yes a ui freeze exception: bug #1151621 | 20:54 |
| ubot2` | Launchpad bug 1151621 in Ubuntu Software Center stable-5-6 "[UIFe] TypeError when opening edit menu" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1151621 | 20:54 |
| slangasek | antarus: 'auth' and 'auth-initial': some modules require different behavior depending on whether they're the first password-prompting module in the stack, or not | 20:54 |
| slangasek | antarus: 'required vs optional'> not exactly; per the wiki page, it's "Primary" == find any one that is okay, vs. "Additional" == run all without regard to success of other "Additional" modules | 20:54 |
| slangasek | antarus: so for instance, if you wanted to authenticate via Unix password OR kerberos OR fingerprint reader, these would all be "primary"; if you wanted to impose additional auth requirements serially, you would use "Additional" | 20:55 |
| slangasek | antarus: and yes, this is all only for common-* - per-service pam configs are out of scope | 20:55 |
| antarus | slangasek: great, thanks for the clarification | 20:56 |
| infinity | doko: That's a pretty impressively large gdb update this late... | 21:37 |
| doko | infinity, sure, but what would it break? | 21:37 |
| infinity | gdb, presumably? :) | 21:37 |
| doko | that we can fix | 21:37 |
| doko | but it's unlikely to break anything else | 21:38 |
| doko | well, maybe apport, but that will get disabled anyway for the release | 21:38 |
| doko | but look at the test results yourself | 21:39 |
| infinity | I assume the retracers also use the gdb native to the release. | 21:39 |
| infinity | Is there a PPA build? | 21:39 |
| * infinity looks in toolchain-r | 21:39 | |
| doko | toolchain-r/ppa | 21:39 |
| infinity | Alright, I'll have a poke. | 21:40 |
| infinity | If the only argument for this is aarch64, I'm not sure it's worth any risk, since you can just land it in three weeks in S instead. | 21:40 |
| doko | ohh, it's python3 too, any general goodness like dwarf4 | 21:41 |
| doko | s/any/and/ | 21:41 |
| cjwatson | Laney: Hmm, I found a bug in the GHC ARM linker, essentially in passing - could cause it to jump into space sometimes | 22:52 |
| cjwatson | Laney: I'm not going to pretend I know it's http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/7316, and will file it separately, but it will be interesting to see if it turns out to cover that | 22:53 |
| cjwatson | Laney: (there was a sign handling error in Thumb relocation) | 22:53 |
| infinity | cjwatson: Hrm. Thumb-only? That could explain the armel/armhf differences in some cases. | 23:25 |
| cjwatson | infinity: Indeed. | 23:25 |
| cjwatson | The ARM encoding of BL doesn't use a sign bit in the same way. | 23:26 |
| cjwatson | ^- Could somebody review that apt-cacher-ng, which I sponsored? Biggish customer waiting for it. | 23:26 |
| cjwatson | (And the previous state of acng appears to have sucked) | 23:26 |
| cjwatson | infinity: This isn't ARM's only problem, but I think I may have figured out ghci's woes as well; building a test package overnight to find out | 23:27 |
| infinity | cjwatson: Dude. You're a machine. | 23:27 |
| infinity | (And I'll poke that acng when LP spits out a diff) | 23:27 |
| cjwatson | The other part of the patch looks like http://paste.ubuntu.com/5690839/, and similar though a bit modified for ghc-7.6 | 23:28 |
| cjwatson | If you were to deduce that this has been a metric pain to figure out you'd be right | 23:29 |
| cjwatson | Anyway, with any luck tomorrow morning I'll be able to see if conduit now builds ... | 23:29 |
| cjwatson | If so then I just need to persuade GHC maintainers to apply patches and then it should be a few days from that to a completed transition, or good enough to remove the remaining blockers | 23:31 |
| infinity | \o/ | 23:31 |
| infinity | I suspect convincing the Debian maintainers won't be hard. :P | 23:32 |
| infinity | They take porting patches very nearly blindly. | 23:32 |
| phillw | cjwatson: please be gentle, I've just emailed you re: mini-iso / netboot. | 23:37 |
| slangasek | cjwatson: this acng patch is surprisingly large for what it purports to do? | 23:50 |
| cjwatson | I looked at it myself a while back, it's quite hard to reduce | 23:51 |
| slangasek | well, e.g.: | 23:51 |
| slangasek | +- off_t m_nRangeFrom, m_nRangeTo; | 23:51 |
| slangasek | ++ off_t m_nReqRangeFrom, m_nReqRangeTo; | 23:51 |
| cjwatson | But happy to go back to Chris to ask for further reductions if need be | 23:51 |
| cjwatson | Yeah, true, that could be reduced | 23:52 |
| slangasek | and the SetOption() API change also looks unrelated | 23:52 |
| slangasek | in fact, the only use of the new API discards the dupeCheck result | 23:53 |
| cjwatson | The reason I didn't go round myself was that the test cycle involves a bunch of laptops at a customer's site, so I was preferring the one that I knew to already have been tested | 23:54 |
| cjwatson | (The main symptom is racy) | 23:54 |
| cjwatson | But if you think it's too risky as it stands then that should take precedence | 23:55 |
| slangasek | well, it's at least more time-consuming to review than it otter be | 23:55 |
| slangasek | I'll probably finish the review & accept, but ask arges to send cleaner patches next time | 23:56 |
| * cjwatson -> bed, feel free to follow up with arges directly ... | 23:56 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!