/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2013/04/13/#kubuntu-devel.txt

kubotu::workspace-bugs:: [1168578] Date & Time in Systemsettings doesn't saves settings changes @ https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1168578 (by BakLAN)00:17
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1168578 in kde-workspace (Ubuntu) "Date & Time in Systemsettings doesn't saves settings changes" [Undecided,New]00:17
=== clay_doh is now known as claydoh
shadeslayeranyone around?06:53
smartboyhwshadeslayer why?06:54
shadeslayerany objections to uploading a new grantlee to kubuntu-backports?06:54
smartboyhwshadeslayer: As long as users can use it without critical bugs then no:P06:55
shadeslayerovidiu-florin: has been using it06:56
* shadeslayer uploads06:59
=== smartboyhw_ is now known as smartboyhw
=== Adityab_ is now known as Adityab
lordievaderGood morning08:30
shadeslayer:/10:00
shadeslayerI'm getting lockups in plasma-desktop10:00
smartboyhwshadeslayer, ;/10:01
soeei left my laptop running all night10:49
soeenow process called kded4 uses 1.3 GB memory10:50
soeeany idea why?10:50
shadeslayer:S11:03
Tm_Tsoee: how you're measuring it?11:03
shadeslayerpoor design 11:03
shadeslayerthat's why11:03
soeeTm_T, looking at system monitor11:04
soeejust killed the bastard, system hangs for few seconds than it start to work again, but monochrome icons are gone :D11:05
Tm_Tsoee: res or virt?11:05
Tm_Tin here while this desktop session has been going for a week it's still eating ~30 MiB res11:05
soeeres ?11:06
soee_back11:11
soee_my net crashed11:11
Tm_Tsoee_: residential memory, even that isn't telling the actual memory usage but if you are going to stare some number it should be that (RSS or RES usually AFAIK)11:14
Tm_Tthis might or might not explain something http://emilics.com/blog/article/mconsumption.html11:14
soee_ok thank you11:14
=== mck182 is now known as mck182|afk
BluesKajHiyas all11:59
smartboyhwAnyone uses Calligra Plan and want to be the maintainer?12:57
Tm_TPlan?12:57
smartboyhwTm_T, yep.12:58
Tm_Taah, that kind of app, never used12:58
* smartboyhw is troubling over some FFe/sync problems.12:59
smartboyhwshadeslayer, you here?13:08
shadeslayeryes13:09
smartboyhwshadeslayer, https://launchpad.net/debian/+source/arandr/0.1.7.1-1 shows the latest version in unstable is 0.1.7.1-1 but the Debian website shows it is 0.1.6-1.13:10
smartboyhwWhich one is correct!?13:10
shadeslayermmmm13:10
smartboyhwshadeslayer, mmm indeed.13:11
shadeslayerhttp://packages.qa.debian.org/a/arandr.html13:11
smartboyhwI need this new version to fix a bug.13:11
shadeslayer Accepted 0.1.7.1-1 in unstable (low)13:11
smartboyhweeeh. Thanks.13:11
smartboyhwshadeslayer, I am wondering would it need an FFe.13:12
smartboyhwshadeslayer, look at http://paste.ubuntu.com/5704407/ and try to determine.13:12
shadeslayerwhut13:12
shadeslayerFFe?13:12
smartboyhwshadeslayer, yep.13:13
smartboyhwI'm not sure would it invoke an FFe when I am needing to fix a bug.13:13
shadeslayerdunno, but I see translation changes, not sure if those qualify as violating the ui freeze13:13
shadeslayergray area for me13:13
shadeslayersmartboyhw: best to do an SRU instead13:14
smartboyhwScottK, Riddell any advice?13:14
shadeslayerwe're 3 weeks from release13:14
smartboyhwshadeslayer, it is in this releaes.13:14
smartboyhw*release.13:14
shadeslayerask in #ubuntu-release ?13:16
smartboyhwshadeslayer, no one replied.13:17
smartboyhwSo I asked you:P13:17
shadeslayerbe patient?13:17
smartboyhwshadeslayer, I know.13:17
smartboyhwJust wanting some advice from a dev first.13:17
smartboyhwshadeslayer, I do have a simplier solution :P13:18
smartboyhwMaybe I shall use that then.13:18
shadeslayer?13:18
shadeslayermy advise is to SRU it13:18
smartboyhwshadeslayer, why?13:19
shadeslayertoo late in the release cycle to sync13:19
shadeslayerwe're only a couple of weeks away from release13:19
smartboyhwshadeslayer, I have a patch here:P13:19
smartboyhwA simple patch that fixes it.13:19
shadeslayerdoesn't matter?13:19
shadeslayerwe're frozen13:19
smartboyhwshadeslayer, .........13:19
smartboyhwshadeslayer, that patch ONLY fixes that bug. I would want the bug to get killed so people can have good experience. IIRC that bug causes the package unlaunchable.13:20
shadeslayermmmm13:21
smartboyhwmmmm13:21
shadeslayerI'm not a release manager, I can't make the call13:21
* smartboyhw suddenly finds a dup.13:21
shadeslayerbut if I was, I'd go for SRU13:21
smartboyhwshadeslayer, I will have to SRU to precise + quantal + raring then. (NOT GOOD)13:21
shadeslayerso?13:22
shadeslayerif it's a minimal patch, how is that an issue?13:22
shadeslayereither way, different people will have different approaches ;)13:22
smartboyhwshadeslayer, that package is seeded though (by Ubuntu Studio)...13:25
shadeslayerhm13:25
shadeslayerThat changes things13:26
shadeslayerif it's included on an default flavor13:26
shadeslayerand it's completely unlaunchable13:26
smartboyhwshadeslayer, yep.13:26
shadeslayerthen it makes sense to get an exception13:26
shadeslayeror drop package from seed :P13:26
smartboyhwshadeslayer, uh:P 13:27
smartboyhwI might just put the patch in debian/patches and get it uploaded.13:27
shadeslayerthis also makes me doubt upstream practices of releasing things :P13:27
shadeslayerif they did not test if things even start before releasing ....13:28
smartboyhwshadeslayer, :P13:28
smartboyhwDamn it turns out I can't actually find the patch.13:47
* smartboyhw needs to go into the repos.13:47
smartboyhwCrap shadeslayer can't find the patch 13:52
smartboyhwThat patch is NOT a patch:(13:52
* smartboyhw is totally fake-ed by the website13:52
smartboyhwOr rather, the patch is broken down into pieces, and I don't know how to work with git.13:54
smartboyhwHmm we wouldn't do libmygpo-qt update right?13:55
shadeslayeryofel: around?15:14
shadeslayerever seen a rejection email like this : http://paste.ubuntu.com/570498215:15
smartboyhw:O15:16
shadeslayerthough it did say : debuild -S -sd did say : dpkg-source: warning: diff `kde-baseapps-4.10.2/debian/patches/4.10.patch' patches file kde-baseapps-4.10.2/plasma/applets/folderview/iconview.cpp twice15:20
shadeslayerwhen debuild -S -sd was running15:20
Riddellshadeslayer: advice on what?16:10
shadeslayeruhm, is this wrt http://paste.ubuntu.com/5704982 ?16:10
shadeslayeror smartboyhw's question16:11
smartboyhwRiddell: Eh too late, just filed an FFe.16:11
shadeslayerRiddell: ever seen something like this http://paste.ubuntu.com/570498216:17
Riddellshadeslayer: nope, best as wgrant 16:43
yofelshadeslayer: never seen that16:55
kubotu::workspace-bugs:: [1168694] A dummy login screen is displayed upon idle @ https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1168694 (by Joonas Saarinen)17:07
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1168694 in kde-workspace (Ubuntu) "A dummy login screen is displayed upon idle" [Undecided,New]17:07

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!