[00:17] ::workspace-bugs:: [1168578] Date & Time in Systemsettings doesn't saves settings changes @ https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1168578 (by BakLAN) [00:17] Launchpad bug 1168578 in kde-workspace (Ubuntu) "Date & Time in Systemsettings doesn't saves settings changes" [Undecided,New] === clay_doh is now known as claydoh [06:53] anyone around? [06:54] shadeslayer why? [06:54] any objections to uploading a new grantlee to kubuntu-backports? [06:55] shadeslayer: As long as users can use it without critical bugs then no:P [06:56] ovidiu-florin: has been using it [06:59] * shadeslayer uploads === smartboyhw_ is now known as smartboyhw === Adityab_ is now known as Adityab [08:30] Good morning [10:00] :/ [10:00] I'm getting lockups in plasma-desktop [10:01] shadeslayer, ;/ [10:49] i left my laptop running all night [10:50] now process called kded4 uses 1.3 GB memory [10:50] any idea why? [11:03] :S [11:03] soee: how you're measuring it? [11:03] poor design [11:03] that's why [11:04] Tm_T, looking at system monitor [11:05] just killed the bastard, system hangs for few seconds than it start to work again, but monochrome icons are gone :D [11:05] soee: res or virt? [11:05] in here while this desktop session has been going for a week it's still eating ~30 MiB res [11:06] res ? [11:11] back [11:11] my net crashed [11:14] soee_: residential memory, even that isn't telling the actual memory usage but if you are going to stare some number it should be that (RSS or RES usually AFAIK) [11:14] this might or might not explain something http://emilics.com/blog/article/mconsumption.html [11:14] ok thank you === mck182 is now known as mck182|afk [11:59] Hiyas all [12:57] Anyone uses Calligra Plan and want to be the maintainer? [12:57] Plan? [12:58] Tm_T, yep. [12:58] aah, that kind of app, never used [12:59] * smartboyhw is troubling over some FFe/sync problems. [13:08] shadeslayer, you here? [13:09] yes [13:10] shadeslayer, https://launchpad.net/debian/+source/arandr/0.1.7.1-1 shows the latest version in unstable is 0.1.7.1-1 but the Debian website shows it is 0.1.6-1. [13:10] Which one is correct!? [13:10] mmmm [13:11] shadeslayer, mmm indeed. [13:11] http://packages.qa.debian.org/a/arandr.html [13:11] I need this new version to fix a bug. [13:11] Accepted 0.1.7.1-1 in unstable (low) [13:11] eeeh. Thanks. [13:12] shadeslayer, I am wondering would it need an FFe. [13:12] shadeslayer, look at http://paste.ubuntu.com/5704407/ and try to determine. [13:12] whut [13:12] FFe? [13:13] shadeslayer, yep. [13:13] I'm not sure would it invoke an FFe when I am needing to fix a bug. [13:13] dunno, but I see translation changes, not sure if those qualify as violating the ui freeze [13:13] gray area for me [13:14] smartboyhw: best to do an SRU instead [13:14] ScottK, Riddell any advice? [13:14] we're 3 weeks from release [13:14] shadeslayer, it is in this releaes. [13:14] *release. [13:16] ask in #ubuntu-release ? [13:17] shadeslayer, no one replied. [13:17] So I asked you:P [13:17] be patient? [13:17] shadeslayer, I know. [13:17] Just wanting some advice from a dev first. [13:18] shadeslayer, I do have a simplier solution :P [13:18] Maybe I shall use that then. [13:18] ? [13:18] my advise is to SRU it [13:19] shadeslayer, why? [13:19] too late in the release cycle to sync [13:19] we're only a couple of weeks away from release [13:19] shadeslayer, I have a patch here:P [13:19] A simple patch that fixes it. [13:19] doesn't matter? [13:19] we're frozen [13:19] shadeslayer, ......... [13:20] shadeslayer, that patch ONLY fixes that bug. I would want the bug to get killed so people can have good experience. IIRC that bug causes the package unlaunchable. [13:21] mmmm [13:21] mmmm [13:21] I'm not a release manager, I can't make the call [13:21] * smartboyhw suddenly finds a dup. [13:21] but if I was, I'd go for SRU [13:21] shadeslayer, I will have to SRU to precise + quantal + raring then. (NOT GOOD) [13:22] so? [13:22] if it's a minimal patch, how is that an issue? [13:22] either way, different people will have different approaches ;) [13:25] shadeslayer, that package is seeded though (by Ubuntu Studio)... [13:25] hm [13:26] That changes things [13:26] if it's included on an default flavor [13:26] and it's completely unlaunchable [13:26] shadeslayer, yep. [13:26] then it makes sense to get an exception [13:26] or drop package from seed :P [13:27] shadeslayer, uh:P [13:27] I might just put the patch in debian/patches and get it uploaded. [13:27] this also makes me doubt upstream practices of releasing things :P [13:28] if they did not test if things even start before releasing .... [13:28] shadeslayer, :P [13:47] Damn it turns out I can't actually find the patch. [13:47] * smartboyhw needs to go into the repos. [13:52] Crap shadeslayer can't find the patch [13:52] That patch is NOT a patch:( [13:52] * smartboyhw is totally fake-ed by the website [13:54] Or rather, the patch is broken down into pieces, and I don't know how to work with git. [13:55] Hmm we wouldn't do libmygpo-qt update right? [15:14] yofel: around? [15:15] ever seen a rejection email like this : http://paste.ubuntu.com/5704982 [15:16] :O [15:20] though it did say : debuild -S -sd did say : dpkg-source: warning: diff `kde-baseapps-4.10.2/debian/patches/4.10.patch' patches file kde-baseapps-4.10.2/plasma/applets/folderview/iconview.cpp twice [15:20] when debuild -S -sd was running [16:10] shadeslayer: advice on what? [16:10] uhm, is this wrt http://paste.ubuntu.com/5704982 ? [16:11] or smartboyhw's question [16:11] Riddell: Eh too late, just filed an FFe. [16:17] Riddell: ever seen something like this http://paste.ubuntu.com/5704982 [16:43] shadeslayer: nope, best as wgrant [16:55] shadeslayer: never seen that [17:07] ::workspace-bugs:: [1168694] A dummy login screen is displayed upon idle @ https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1168694 (by Joonas Saarinen) [17:07] Launchpad bug 1168694 in kde-workspace (Ubuntu) "A dummy login screen is displayed upon idle" [Undecided,New]