| === andrelei_ is now known as andreleite77 | ||
| === billy_ is now known as wickedpuppy | ||
| === security is now known as megha | ||
| tcb^ll3r | cd /etc | 06:03 |
|---|---|---|
| tcb^ll3r | ls | 06:03 |
| tcb^ll3r | lol | 06:03 |
| tcb^ll3r | sry | 06:03 |
| antix | cat /etc/passwd | 06:03 |
| tcb^ll3r | what should DSHELL be in adduser.conf to deny shell access? | 06:05 |
| tcb^ll3r | i set it to /sbin/nologin , but that makes ubuntu gods angry | 06:06 |
| === sw0rdfish- is now known as sw0rdfish | ||
| === smw_ is now known as smw | ||
| === G4MBY is now known as G4MBY2 | ||
| judas | using exportfs only gives the client 'access denied' | 12:33 |
| judas | although entries in exports work fine | 12:33 |
| === acidflash__ is now known as acidflash | ||
| Rarrikins | If /tmp isn't writeable and I reboot, will I still be able to log in remotely via SSH? | 13:21 |
| Merkidemis | Can someone help me with an error? I am trying to do an apt-get update on my lucid server and get the following: W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/lucid/Release.gpg Could not connect to archive.ubuntu.com:80 (2001:67c:1360:8c01::1a). - connect (101 Network is unreachable) [IP: 2001:67c:1360:8c01::1a 80] | 13:27 |
| Merkidemis | Hello? | 13:30 |
| cfhowlett | Merkidemis, I see you ... perhaps it's SysAdmin coffeebreak? | 13:30 |
| Merkidemis | it is early on a sunday... | 13:31 |
| andol | Merkidemis: Having a broken IPv6 connectivity? | 13:31 |
| andol | Merkidemis: At least myself I have no problem talking http over ipv6 to that address. | 13:31 |
| Merkidemis | andol: probably, though I'd be fine if apt would just use IPv4 | 13:32 |
| Merkidemis | andol: I have tried changing gai.conf, commenting the ailias in modprobe.d/ailiases, adding entries to hosts to map the URL to the IPv4 address, adding lines to sysctl.conf to disable IPv6 (which results in a 97 protocol not supported error)... | 13:34 |
| Merkidemis | andol: the machine currenlty has a Link IPv6 address, but I can't ping6 anything (network unreachable error). Like I said, if I could get APT to use IPv4 I'd be happy | 13:35 |
| Merkidemis | Can someone help me with an error? I am trying to do an apt-get update on my lucid server and get the following: W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/lucid/Release.gpg Could not connect to archive.ubuntu.com:80 (2001:67c:1360:8c01::1a). - connect (101 Network is unreachable) [IP: 2001:67c:1360:8c01::1a 80] | 15:08 |
| wickedpuppy | archive.ubuntu.com is up though | 15:09 |
| wickedpuppy | I can ping | 15:09 |
| wickedpuppy | can you? | 15:09 |
| packetfrog | ./etc/network/interfaces might not be setup right | 15:11 |
| === wedgwood_away is now known as wedgwood | ||
| Merkidemis | yes, I can ping it just fine over ipv4 | 15:13 |
| Merkidemis | Here is my interfaces: | 15:13 |
| Merkidemis | auto lo | 15:13 |
| Merkidemis | iface lo inet loopback | 15:13 |
| Merkidemis | # The primary network interface | 15:13 |
| Merkidemis | auto eth0 | 15:13 |
| Merkidemis | iface eth0 inet static | 15:13 |
| Merkidemis | address 192.168.10.250 | 15:13 |
| Merkidemis | netmask 255.255.255.0 | 15:13 |
| Merkidemis | network 192.168.10.0 | 15:13 |
| Merkidemis | broadcast 192.168.10.255 | 15:13 |
| Merkidemis | gateway 192.168.10.1 | 15:13 |
| packetfrog | apt-get update 2> /tmp/keymissing; for key in $(grep "NO_PUBKEY" /tmp/keymissing |sed "s/.*NO_PUBKEY //"); do echo -e "\nProcessing key: $key"; sudo apt-key adv --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-keys $key ; done | 15:14 |
| packetfrog | then update | 15:15 |
| packetfrog | again | 15:15 |
| packetfrog | ;'/ | 15:15 |
| RoyK | !pastebin | 15:16 |
| ubottu | For posting multi-line texts into the channel, please use http://paste.ubuntu.com | To post !screenshots use http://imagebin.org/?page=add | !pastebinit to paste directly from command line | Make sure you give us the URL for your paste - see also the channel topic. | 15:16 |
| Merkidemis | one sec | 15:17 |
| RoyK | pastebin ifconfig output too | 15:18 |
| RoyK | seems it's trying to reach an IPv6 address and you only have IPv4 configured | 15:18 |
| cyberglyph | hey guys i have a old p4 1.6ghz and I want to use it to do a proxy server they said server is the best but I don't know command line any ideas or is it possible to do being Im a noob? | 15:56 |
| Merkidemis | packetfrog: copied the above into a bash script, ran it, then tried doing an update again. Same errors | 15:58 |
| patdk-lap | cyberglyph, it's easy enough, but you will have to use cli, no matter what | 15:58 |
| packetfrog | copy/paste to terminal and hit enter | 15:58 |
| patdk-lap | so might as well start learning | 15:58 |
| packetfrog | tell me what it says | 15:58 |
| packetfrog | cyberglyph, google for a tutorial "ubuntu proxy server tutorial" or whatever read it if you think you can, you can. | 15:59 |
| === security is now known as megha | ||
| Merkidemis | packetfrog: trying again, one moment while it tries the connections | 16:01 |
| Merkidemis | packetfrog: still getting Err http://archive.ubuntu.com lucid-updates Release.gpg | 16:07 |
| Merkidemis | Could not connect to archive.ubuntu.com:80 (2001:67c:1360:8c01::18). - connect (101 Network is unreachable) [IP: 2001:67c:1360:8c01::18 80] | 16:07 |
| qman__ | cyberglyph, you will have to use the command line to set up the server software regardless if you have a GUI installed, because that's how it's done; there are no GUI tools to do it for you | 16:08 |
| qman__ | cyberglyph, installing a GUI on the server end is therefore a waste of resources and a potential security vulnerability | 16:09 |
| cyberglyph | ok thats cool but i don't know command level stuff so I would be wasting my time with the server or should I try to learn a little to get up and going | 16:10 |
| qman__ | you should try to learn, it's not that hard | 16:10 |
| packetfrog | cyberglyph, You dont need to learn any of it. | 16:11 |
| packetfrog | It is not going to make you anonymous by running a proxy server in your home network | 16:11 |
| qman__ | there are other reasons to use proxies, such as caching/optimization and authentication | 16:11 |
| packetfrog | Not that he wants | 16:12 |
| packetfrog | or asked about anyhow | 16:12 |
| packetfrog | Merkidemis, You can ping that host right? | 16:12 |
| Merkidemis | via ipv4, yes | 16:13 |
| Merkidemis | packetfrog: ttl=47, average time is 140 for each ping | 16:14 |
| packetfrog | Do you have a firewall running? | 16:15 |
| Merkidemis | packetfrog: never set one up on here, let me double check the router | 16:15 |
| Merkidemis | packeetfrog: firewall disabled on router, iptables -L shows: Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) | 16:22 |
| Merkidemis | target prot opt source destination | 16:22 |
| Merkidemis | Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT) | 16:22 |
| Merkidemis | target prot opt source destination | 16:22 |
| Merkidemis | Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT) | 16:22 |
| Merkidemis | target prot opt source destination | 16:22 |
| packetfrog | Is this on going? or just a new issue? | 16:22 |
| Merkidemis | packetfrog: new in that I haven't tried to do an update for a long time. All my other services that I have running, namely my mediatomb server, still works just fine. | 16:23 |
| packetfrog | Merkidemis, Can I PM you? | 16:29 |
| packetfrog | I do not feel like pastebinning | 16:29 |
| Merkidemis | sure thing | 16:30 |
| === wedgwood is now known as wedgwood_away | ||
| Merkidemis | packetfrog: plugging directly into the router (bypassing the switch) "fixed" the problem and allowed me to do updates | 17:36 |
| herman__ | does anyone know how to set apache to return an https connection? | 17:56 |
| Merkidemis | packetfrog: and of course after the update and upgrade I can't ssh into it anymore | 17:58 |
| catphish | i'm having trouble with vlan traffic since a kernel upgrade, i'm seeing outgoing traffic from bond0.3 being transmitted on bond0, but incoming traffic (identified by tcpdump as vlan3) isn't being copied to bond0.3 | 17:59 |
| === HelenCrowley is now known as LS-MFT | ||
| catphish | is there a way to run 10.04 with a much newer kernel? there seem to be bugs in both 3.0.0-32 and 2.6.32-46 | 18:26 |
| patdk-lap | you can run it with any kernel you want | 18:32 |
| patdk-lap | at some point you will hit libc issues, and other utility issues | 18:32 |
| patdk-lap | but it is probably going be just fine, cause 10.04 isn't that old | 18:32 |
| catphish | what would be the best approach? is there a ppa i can look to? | 18:33 |
| patdk-lap | you could | 18:33 |
| patdk-lap | but why bother using a ppa? | 18:33 |
| catphish | simplicity | 18:33 |
| catphish | unless there is a trivial way to compile a kernel with appropriate drivers, i haven't done it for years | 18:34 |
| patdk-lap | I don't understand how using a ppa is easier than not doing anything | 18:34 |
| patdk-lap | linux-image-server-lts-backport-maverick - Linux kernel image on Server Equipment. | 18:35 |
| patdk-lap | linux-image-server-lts-backport-natty - Linux kernel image on Server Equipment. | 18:35 |
| patdk-lap | linux-image-server-lts-backport-oneiric - Linux kernel image on Server Equipment. | 18:35 |
| patdk-lap | odd I couldn't locate a precise backported one | 18:36 |
| catphish | i'm not sure what versions those refer to | 18:37 |
| patdk-lap | 10.10, 11.04, 11.10 | 18:37 |
| patdk-lap | really, just ask your computer what they are | 18:38 |
| catphish | i mean kernel versions, i assume whatever currently ships with those releases | 18:38 |
| catphish | i'd really like the precise kernel | 18:38 |
| catphish | as i know that works | 18:38 |
| patdk-lap | serialy use apt-cache show | 18:38 |
| patdk-lap | heh? upgrade to precise then | 18:38 |
| patdk-lap | why bother sticking iwth 10.04? | 18:38 |
| catphish | i intend to upgrade | 18:39 |
| catphish | but in the meantime, i'm looking to avoid a couple of specific bugs | 18:39 |
| catphish | i'm sad that the bugfixes haven't been backported, but i guess they're not common enough | 18:39 |
| patdk-lap | what bugfix? | 18:40 |
| catphish | 2.6.32 has a bug that causes some systems to crash after 200 days | 18:41 |
| patdk-lap | heh? that is not very descriptive at all | 18:41 |
| patdk-lap | and I have not see nthat, with many systems running for much longer than that | 18:41 |
| catphish | only some systems are affected | 18:42 |
| catphish | unfortunately almost all of mine | 18:42 |
| catphish | i think it affects specific CPUs with virtualization enabled | 18:42 |
| patdk-lap | well, all my systems have vt enabled | 18:42 |
| patdk-lap | though I only have 1 amd system | 18:42 |
| catphish | i know it's intel specific | 18:43 |
| patdk-lap | well, there isn't anything I can do, unless you can point to this bug, or bugfix | 18:43 |
| patdk-lap | as your groping around with very general ideas, and no idea what is going on | 18:43 |
| catphish | patdk-lap: i don't understand, are you an ubuntu maintainer? | 18:44 |
| patdk-lap | define that | 18:44 |
| catphish | ok, well since you seem to care, the bug is described in detail here: http://www.novell.com/support/kb/doc.php?id=7009834 | 18:44 |
| catphish | not sure what version it as fixed in the upstream kernel | 18:45 |
| catphish | upgrading to linux-image-server-lts-backport-oneiric fixes it, but also introduces broken vlan support on my NICs, i could try linux-image-server-lts-backport-natty, i'll just need to verify that it contains the fix for the crash | 18:46 |
| patdk-lap | hmm, tsc unstable, that seems to be an issue | 18:47 |
| patdk-lap | I don't have any system with that | 18:47 |
| catphish | not sure if it's also this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/805341 | 18:48 |
| uvirtbot | Launchpad bug 805341 in linux "sched clock overflows in 208 days (i386 and amd64)" [Undecided,Fix released] | 18:48 |
| catphish | seems more specific | 18:48 |
| patdk-lap | same issue | 18:49 |
| patdk-lap | This was fixed in Lucid already in: 2.6.32.50 | 18:50 |
| patdk-lap | According to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/902317 | 18:50 |
| uvirtbot | Launchpad bug 902317 in linux "Lucid update to 2.6.32.50 stable release" [Undecided,Fix released] | 18:50 |
| catphish | that thread claims that its fixed in lucid | 18:50 |
| patdk-lap | hmm. 2.6.32.38 | 18:51 |
| patdk-lap | 2.6.32-38 ubuntu kernel version | 18:51 |
| catphish | well my issue occurs in vmlinuz-2.6.32-46-generic | 18:52 |
| patdk-lap | but what is your issue? | 18:52 |
| patdk-lap | you have a panic? | 18:52 |
| patdk-lap | so we can be sure it's the *same* issue? | 18:52 |
| catphish | no, it's a slowdown | 18:52 |
| catphish | it leaves hosts pingable, but useless | 18:52 |
| patdk-lap | well, different issue is different | 18:52 |
| catphish | ok | 18:53 |
| catphish | i'll have to look harder for related bugs them | 18:53 |
| catphish | *then | 18:53 |
| catphish | just looking for logs now | 18:55 |
| catphish | all i see in the logs is a lot of blocked processes | 18:57 |
| catphish | eg. INFO: task cron:1709 blocked for more than 120 seconds. | 18:57 |
| catphish | i do have constant_tsc and nonstop_tsc | 18:58 |
| dream_ | hello how do i fix server 10.04 lts, system broke while trying to upgrade | 18:59 |
| dream_ | server cd with fix option didnt work for me as i couldnt choose right options as i didnt want my partition to be destroyed | 18:59 |
| catphish | another question might be why bnx2+bridge+vlan is broken in 3.0.0-32-generic, but that's not somewhere i'm focusing | 19:00 |
| catphish | patdk-lap: thanks for all your help, i believe i was mistaken, and the bug has now been patched in linux-image-2.6.32-38-server on lucid | 19:07 |
| Patrickdk | if your system remains up, but slow, it's not that bug | 19:08 |
| Patrickdk | it's something else | 19:08 |
| catphish | (assuming my bug is the same, which i'm convinced it is) | 19:08 |
| catphish | oh, perhaps i'm mistaken then | 19:08 |
| catphish | :( | 19:08 |
| catphish | same cpu flags, same timeframe | 19:09 |
| Patrickdk | yes, that tsc thing might be affecting other things also | 19:09 |
| Patrickdk | and that might still need to be fixed | 19:09 |
| catphish | the ubuntu bug mentions "BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 17163091968s" | 19:09 |
| catphish | that doesn't sound like a panic | 19:09 |
| Patrickdk | the suse one was a panic | 19:10 |
| catphish | it was, but the ubuntu one is a soft lockup | 19:10 |
| Patrickdk | that softlockup would be it just noticing the time jump | 19:10 |
| Patrickdk | it didn't really lockup | 19:10 |
| catphish | "Other problems caused by this overflow include task scheduler unfairness. softlockups ('stuck for 61s!') are observed in 210~220 days after reboot but I've not yet succeeded to explain the logic." | 19:11 |
| catphish | can't be sure but it certainly all seems related | 19:11 |
| catphish | my dsl has slowed to such a crawl i can't work any more | 19:13 |
| catphish | i will most likely upgrade everything to 2.6.32-46 and plan a proper 12.04 migration within the next 200 days in case | 19:13 |
| catphish | thanks again for your help Patrickdk | 19:13 |
| Patrickdk | too hard to backup and do a test upgrade? | 19:14 |
| Patrickdk | my upgrades from lucid to precise have gone extreemly well | 19:14 |
| catphish | i prefer reinstall and data restore | 19:15 |
| catphish | but that's fine | 19:15 |
| dream_ | how do i reinstall 10.04 without losing data and w/o repartitioning? | 19:16 |
| dream_ | my system broke | 19:16 |
| catphish | the installer should let you do that, but i'd be worried about my data in doing so | 19:16 |
| catphish | just mark the root partition as the root partition and select not to format it | 19:17 |
| dream_ | it asks for partitioning always which will result in losing data :( | 19:18 |
| Patrickdk | no it does not | 19:18 |
| catphish | it asks for partition information, but doesn't make you change anything | 19:18 |
| dream_ | so if i try to upgrade it keeps all info on HD? | 19:19 |
| dream_ | burnt the new version | 19:21 |
| dream_ | lemme try with that | 19:21 |
| zastaph | I think this is more an ubuntu issue than vagrant so i'll ask for advice here: https://github.com/mitchellh/vagrant/issues/289 | 20:56 |
| zastaph | i tried the 2 lowest suggestions, but they didnt help.. it still fails on apt-get -y upgrade with Errors were encountered while processing: grub-pc | 20:56 |
| zastaph | because it wants to do package configuration which is not easy from vagrant | 20:57 |
| KatyPerryX420 | #freenode said try here so here's what's going on ok so i just have installed the hybrid irc server for ubuntu 12.04 thru ssh and i need help setting my message of the day and conniction info it's running on a remote server | 21:02 |
| KatyPerryX420 | brb just pm me | 21:04 |
| KatyPerryX420 | so how would i go about what i need to do | 21:37 |
| packetfrog | what ircd software? | 21:38 |
| KatyPerryX420 | uh hybrid irc and i need to set up a hybserv to talk to the hybrid irc | 21:43 |
| KatyPerryX420 | not much command line exp in linux as i mainly just use windows 7 | 21:43 |
| packetfrog | http://www.the-tech-tutorial.com/?p=709 | 21:44 |
| packetfrog | live long and prosper. | 21:44 |
| Merkidemis | packetfrog: so, if I change the static ip from 192.168.1.250 to 192.168.1.25 everything is fine, and it can be on the switch. I do so love networking.... | 22:05 |
| packetfrog | LOL | 22:06 |
| packetfrog | Nice! At least you got it done.. | 22:06 |
| * packetfrog claps | 22:07 | |
| KatyPerryX420 | packetfrog: i've looked at that tut and another one and i'm just not catching on | 22:08 |
| packetfrog | KatyPerryX420, Then you should likely find something else to do with your time. pretty straight forward... :p | 22:13 |
| packetfrog | or hire a sysadmin to do it for you | 22:13 |
| packetfrog | :P | 22:13 |
| nigelb | Hi! Is there an easy way to get the ip address of my lxc container? | 22:18 |
| zastaph | I don't know how many times i've visited ubuntuforums.org with a post that said [SOLVED] and didn't find the solution :) | 22:37 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!