[06:03] <tcb^ll3r> cd /etc
[06:03] <tcb^ll3r> ls
[06:03] <tcb^ll3r> lol
[06:03] <tcb^ll3r> sry
[06:03] <antix> cat /etc/passwd
[06:05] <tcb^ll3r> what should DSHELL be in adduser.conf to deny shell access?
[06:06] <tcb^ll3r> i set it to /sbin/nologin , but that makes ubuntu gods angry
[12:33] <judas> using exportfs only gives the client 'access denied'
[12:33] <judas> although entries in exports work fine
[13:21] <Rarrikins> If /tmp isn't writeable and I reboot, will I still be able to log in remotely via SSH?
[13:27] <Merkidemis>  Can someone help me with an error? I am trying to do an apt-get update on my lucid server and get the following: W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/lucid/Release.gpg  Could not connect to archive.ubuntu.com:80 (2001:67c:1360:8c01::1a). - connect (101 Network is unreachable) [IP: 2001:67c:1360:8c01::1a 80]
[13:30] <Merkidemis> Hello?
[13:30] <cfhowlett> Merkidemis, I see you ... perhaps it's SysAdmin coffeebreak?
[13:31] <Merkidemis> it is early on a sunday...
[13:31] <andol> Merkidemis: Having a broken IPv6 connectivity?
[13:31] <andol> Merkidemis: At least myself I have no problem talking http over ipv6 to that address.
[13:32] <Merkidemis> andol: probably, though I'd be fine if apt would just use IPv4
[13:34] <Merkidemis> andol: I have tried changing gai.conf, commenting the ailias in modprobe.d/ailiases, adding entries to hosts to map the URL to the IPv4 address, adding lines to sysctl.conf to disable IPv6 (which results in a 97 protocol not supported error)...
[13:35] <Merkidemis> andol: the machine currenlty has a Link IPv6 address, but I can't ping6 anything (network unreachable error).  Like I said, if I could get APT to use IPv4 I'd be happy
[15:08] <Merkidemis> Can someone help me with an error? I am trying to do an apt-get update on my lucid server and get the following: W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/lucid/Release.gpg  Could not connect to archive.ubuntu.com:80 (2001:67c:1360:8c01::1a). - connect (101 Network is unreachable) [IP: 2001:67c:1360:8c01::1a 80]
[15:09] <wickedpuppy> archive.ubuntu.com is up though
[15:09] <wickedpuppy> I can ping
[15:09] <wickedpuppy> can you?
[15:11] <packetfrog> ./etc/network/interfaces might not be setup right
[15:13] <Merkidemis> yes, I can ping it just fine over ipv4
[15:13] <Merkidemis> Here is my interfaces:
[15:13] <Merkidemis> auto lo
[15:13] <Merkidemis> iface lo inet loopback
[15:13] <Merkidemis> # The primary network interface
[15:13] <Merkidemis> auto eth0
[15:13] <Merkidemis> iface eth0 inet static
[15:13] <Merkidemis>         address 192.168.10.250
[15:13] <Merkidemis>         netmask 255.255.255.0
[15:13] <Merkidemis>         network 192.168.10.0
[15:13] <Merkidemis>         broadcast 192.168.10.255
[15:13] <Merkidemis>         gateway 192.168.10.1
[15:14] <packetfrog>  apt-get update 2> /tmp/keymissing; for key in $(grep "NO_PUBKEY" /tmp/keymissing |sed "s/.*NO_PUBKEY //"); do echo -e "\nProcessing key: $key"; sudo apt-key adv --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-keys $key ; done
[15:15] <packetfrog> then update
[15:15] <packetfrog> again
[15:15] <packetfrog> ;'/
[15:16] <RoyK> !pastebin
[15:17] <Merkidemis> one sec
[15:18] <RoyK> pastebin ifconfig output too
[15:18] <RoyK> seems it's trying to reach an IPv6 address and you only have IPv4 configured
[15:56] <cyberglyph> hey guys i have a old p4 1.6ghz and I want to use it to do a proxy server they said server is the best but I don't know command line any ideas or is it possible to do being Im a noob?
[15:58] <Merkidemis> packetfrog: copied the above into a bash script, ran it, then tried doing an update again. Same errors
[15:58] <patdk-lap> cyberglyph, it's easy enough, but you will have to use cli, no matter what
[15:58] <packetfrog> copy/paste to terminal and hit enter
[15:58] <patdk-lap> so might as well start learning
[15:58] <packetfrog> tell me what it says
[15:59] <packetfrog> cyberglyph, google for a tutorial "ubuntu proxy server tutorial" or whatever    read it   if you think you can, you can.
[16:01] <Merkidemis> packetfrog: trying again, one moment while it tries the connections
[16:07] <Merkidemis> packetfrog: still getting Err http://archive.ubuntu.com lucid-updates Release.gpg
[16:07] <Merkidemis>   Could not connect to archive.ubuntu.com:80 (2001:67c:1360:8c01::18). - connect (101 Network is unreachable) [IP: 2001:67c:1360:8c01::18 80]
[16:08] <qman__> cyberglyph, you will have to use the command line to set up the server software regardless if you have a GUI installed, because that's how it's done; there are no GUI tools to do it for you
[16:09] <qman__> cyberglyph, installing a GUI on the server end is therefore a waste of resources and a potential security vulnerability
[16:10] <cyberglyph> ok thats cool but i don't know command level stuff so I would be wasting my time with the server or should I try to learn a little to get up and going
[16:10] <qman__> you should try to learn, it's not that hard
[16:11] <packetfrog> cyberglyph, You dont need to learn any of it.
[16:11] <packetfrog> It is not going to make you anonymous by running a proxy server in your home network
[16:11] <qman__> there are other reasons to use proxies, such as caching/optimization and authentication
[16:12] <packetfrog> Not that he wants
[16:12] <packetfrog> or asked about anyhow
[16:12] <packetfrog> Merkidemis, You can ping that host right?
[16:13] <Merkidemis> via ipv4, yes
[16:14] <Merkidemis> packetfrog: ttl=47, average time is 140 for each ping
[16:15] <packetfrog> Do you have a firewall running?
[16:15] <Merkidemis> packetfrog: never set one up on here, let me double check the router
[16:22] <Merkidemis> packeetfrog: firewall disabled on router, iptables -L shows: Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
[16:22] <Merkidemis> target     prot opt source               destination
[16:22] <Merkidemis> Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT)
[16:22] <Merkidemis> target     prot opt source               destination
[16:22] <Merkidemis> Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT)
[16:22] <Merkidemis> target     prot opt source               destination
[16:22] <packetfrog> Is this on going? or just a new issue?
[16:23] <Merkidemis> packetfrog: new in that I haven't tried to do an update for a long time.  All my other services that I have running, namely my mediatomb server, still works just fine.
[16:29] <packetfrog> Merkidemis,  Can I PM you?
[16:29] <packetfrog> I do not feel like pastebinning
[16:30] <Merkidemis> sure thing
[17:36] <Merkidemis> packetfrog: plugging directly into the router (bypassing the switch) "fixed" the problem and allowed me to do updates
[17:56] <herman__> does anyone know how to set apache to return an https connection?
[17:58] <Merkidemis> packetfrog: and of course after the update and upgrade I can't ssh into it anymore
[17:59] <catphish> i'm having trouble with vlan traffic since a kernel upgrade, i'm seeing outgoing traffic from bond0.3 being transmitted on bond0, but incoming traffic (identified by tcpdump as vlan3) isn't being copied to bond0.3
[18:26] <catphish> is there a way to run 10.04 with a much newer kernel? there seem to be bugs in both 3.0.0-32 and 2.6.32-46
[18:32] <patdk-lap> you can run it with any kernel you want
[18:32] <patdk-lap> at some point you will hit libc issues, and other utility issues
[18:32] <patdk-lap> but it is probably going be just fine, cause 10.04 isn't that old
[18:33] <catphish> what would be the best approach? is there a ppa i can look to?
[18:33] <patdk-lap> you could
[18:33] <patdk-lap> but why bother using a ppa?
[18:33] <catphish> simplicity
[18:34] <catphish> unless there is a trivial way to compile a kernel with appropriate drivers, i haven't done it for years
[18:34] <patdk-lap> I don't understand how using a ppa is easier than not doing anything
[18:35] <patdk-lap> linux-image-server-lts-backport-maverick - Linux kernel image on Server Equipment.
[18:35] <patdk-lap> linux-image-server-lts-backport-natty - Linux kernel image on Server Equipment.
[18:35] <patdk-lap> linux-image-server-lts-backport-oneiric - Linux kernel image on Server Equipment.
[18:36] <patdk-lap> odd I couldn't locate a precise backported one
[18:37] <catphish> i'm not sure what versions those refer to
[18:37] <patdk-lap> 10.10, 11.04, 11.10
[18:38] <patdk-lap> really, just ask your computer what they are
[18:38] <catphish> i mean kernel versions, i assume whatever currently ships with those releases
[18:38] <catphish> i'd really like the precise kernel
[18:38] <catphish> as i know that works
[18:38] <patdk-lap> serialy use apt-cache show
[18:38] <patdk-lap> heh? upgrade to precise then
[18:38] <patdk-lap> why bother sticking iwth 10.04?
[18:39] <catphish> i intend to upgrade
[18:39] <catphish> but in the meantime, i'm looking to avoid a couple of specific bugs
[18:39] <catphish> i'm sad that the bugfixes haven't been backported, but i guess they're not common enough
[18:40] <patdk-lap> what bugfix?
[18:41] <catphish> 2.6.32 has a bug that causes some systems to crash after 200 days
[18:41] <patdk-lap> heh? that is not very descriptive at all
[18:41] <patdk-lap> and I have not see nthat, with many systems running for much longer than that
[18:42] <catphish> only some systems are affected
[18:42] <catphish> unfortunately almost all of mine
[18:42] <catphish> i think it affects specific CPUs with virtualization enabled
[18:42] <patdk-lap> well, all my systems have vt enabled
[18:42] <patdk-lap> though I only have 1 amd system
[18:43] <catphish> i know it's intel specific
[18:43] <patdk-lap> well, there isn't anything I can do, unless you can point to this bug, or bugfix
[18:43] <patdk-lap> as your groping around with very general ideas, and no idea what is going on
[18:44] <catphish> patdk-lap: i don't understand, are you an ubuntu maintainer?
[18:44] <patdk-lap> define that
[18:44] <catphish> ok, well since you seem to care, the bug is described in detail here: http://www.novell.com/support/kb/doc.php?id=7009834
[18:45] <catphish> not sure what version it as fixed in the upstream kernel
[18:46] <catphish> upgrading to linux-image-server-lts-backport-oneiric fixes it, but also introduces broken vlan support on my NICs, i could try linux-image-server-lts-backport-natty, i'll just need to verify that it contains the fix for the crash
[18:47] <patdk-lap> hmm, tsc unstable, that seems to be an issue
[18:47] <patdk-lap> I don't have any system with that
[18:48] <catphish> not sure if it's also this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/805341
[18:48] <catphish> seems more specific
[18:49] <patdk-lap> same issue
[18:50] <patdk-lap> This was fixed in Lucid already in: 2.6.32.50
[18:50] <patdk-lap> According to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/902317
[18:50] <catphish> that thread claims that its fixed in lucid
[18:51] <patdk-lap> hmm. 2.6.32.38
[18:51] <patdk-lap> 2.6.32-38 ubuntu kernel version
[18:52] <catphish> well my issue occurs in vmlinuz-2.6.32-46-generic
[18:52] <patdk-lap> but what is your issue?
[18:52] <patdk-lap> you have a panic?
[18:52] <patdk-lap> so we can be sure it's the *same* issue?
[18:52] <catphish> no, it's a slowdown
[18:52] <catphish> it leaves hosts pingable, but useless
[18:52] <patdk-lap> well, different issue is different
[18:53] <catphish> ok
[18:53] <catphish> i'll have to look harder for related bugs them
[18:53] <catphish> *then
[18:55] <catphish> just looking for logs now
[18:57] <catphish> all i see in the logs is a lot of blocked processes
[18:57] <catphish> eg. INFO: task cron:1709 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
[18:58] <catphish> i do have constant_tsc and nonstop_tsc
[18:59] <dream_> hello how do i fix server 10.04 lts, system broke while trying to upgrade
[18:59] <dream_> server cd with fix option didnt work for me as i couldnt choose right options as i didnt want my partition to be destroyed
[19:00] <catphish> another question might be why bnx2+bridge+vlan is broken in 3.0.0-32-generic, but that's not somewhere i'm focusing
[19:07] <catphish> patdk-lap: thanks for all your help, i believe i was mistaken, and the bug has now been patched in linux-image-2.6.32-38-server on lucid
[19:08] <Patrickdk> if your system remains up, but slow, it's not that bug
[19:08] <Patrickdk> it's something else
[19:08] <catphish> (assuming my bug is the same, which i'm convinced it is)
[19:08] <catphish> oh, perhaps i'm mistaken then
[19:08] <catphish> :(
[19:09] <catphish> same cpu flags, same timeframe
[19:09] <Patrickdk> yes, that tsc thing might be affecting other things also
[19:09] <Patrickdk> and that might still need to be fixed
[19:09] <catphish> the ubuntu bug mentions "BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 17163091968s"
[19:09] <catphish> that doesn't sound like a panic
[19:10] <Patrickdk> the suse one was a panic
[19:10] <catphish> it was, but the ubuntu one is a soft lockup
[19:10] <Patrickdk> that softlockup would be it just noticing the time jump
[19:10] <Patrickdk> it didn't really lockup
[19:11] <catphish> "Other problems caused by this overflow include task scheduler unfairness. softlockups ('stuck for 61s!') are observed in 210~220 days after reboot but I've not yet succeeded to explain the logic."
[19:11] <catphish> can't be sure but it certainly all seems related
[19:13] <catphish> my dsl has slowed to such a crawl i can't work any more
[19:13] <catphish> i will most likely upgrade everything to 2.6.32-46 and plan a proper 12.04 migration within the next 200 days in case
[19:13] <catphish> thanks again for your help Patrickdk
[19:14] <Patrickdk> too hard to backup and do a test upgrade?
[19:14] <Patrickdk> my upgrades from lucid to precise have gone extreemly well
[19:15] <catphish> i prefer reinstall and data restore
[19:15] <catphish> but that's fine
[19:16] <dream_> how do i reinstall 10.04 without losing data and w/o repartitioning?
[19:16] <dream_> my system broke
[19:16] <catphish> the installer should let you do that, but i'd be worried about my data in doing so
[19:17] <catphish> just mark the root partition as the root partition and select not to format it
[19:18] <dream_> it asks for partitioning always which will result in losing data :(
[19:18] <Patrickdk> no it does not
[19:18] <catphish> it asks for partition information, but doesn't make you change anything
[19:19] <dream_> so if i try to upgrade it keeps all info on HD?
[19:21] <dream_> burnt the new version
[19:21] <dream_> lemme try with that
[20:56] <zastaph> I think this is more an ubuntu issue than vagrant so i'll ask for advice here: https://github.com/mitchellh/vagrant/issues/289
[20:56] <zastaph> i tried the 2 lowest suggestions, but they didnt help.. it still fails on apt-get -y upgrade with Errors were encountered while processing: grub-pc
[20:57] <zastaph> because it wants to do package configuration which is not easy from vagrant
[21:02] <KatyPerryX420> #freenode said try  here so here's what's going on ok so i just have installed the hybrid irc server for ubuntu 12.04 thru ssh and i need help setting my message of the day and conniction info it's running on a remote server
[21:04] <KatyPerryX420> brb just pm me
[21:37] <KatyPerryX420> so how would i go about what i need to do
[21:38] <packetfrog> what ircd software?
[21:43] <KatyPerryX420> uh hybrid irc and i need to set up a hybserv to talk to the hybrid irc
[21:43] <KatyPerryX420> not much command line exp in linux as i mainly just use windows 7
[21:44] <packetfrog> http://www.the-tech-tutorial.com/?p=709
[21:44] <packetfrog> live long and prosper.
[22:05] <Merkidemis> packetfrog: so, if I change the static ip from 192.168.1.250 to 192.168.1.25 everything is fine, and it can be on the switch.  I do so love networking....
[22:06] <packetfrog> LOL
[22:06] <packetfrog> Nice! At least you got it done..
[22:07]  * packetfrog claps
[22:08] <KatyPerryX420> packetfrog: i've looked at that tut and another one and i'm just not catching on
[22:13] <packetfrog> KatyPerryX420, Then you should likely find something else to do with your time. pretty straight forward... :p
[22:13] <packetfrog> or hire a sysadmin to do it for you
[22:13] <packetfrog> :P
[22:18] <nigelb> Hi! Is there an easy way to get the ip address of my lxc container?
[22:37] <zastaph> I don't know how many times i've visited ubuntuforums.org with a post that said [SOLVED] and didn't find the solution :)