[07:41] <Snark> infinity: about https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gmp/2%3A5.0.5%2Bdfsg-2ubuntu3
[07:41] <Snark> who is the patch author (they're not documented as per DEP-3)
[07:41] <Snark> ?
[07:42] <Snark> where those patches forwarded to gmp upstream?
[07:42] <Snark> and to mpir upstream, since they're a fork and they help there too?
[09:14] <hrw> infinity: can you grab vboot-utils from NEW queue? one step closer for chromebook support ;D
[10:19] <infinity> Snark: The patch author was me, if I uploaded it.  And no, I didn't forward it upstream at the time, because it was a known binutils bug that I figured would get fixed.
[10:27] <Snark> infinity: did it get fixed? Will the patch break compilation with earlier binutils?
[10:28] <Snark> do you have a link to the binutils bug?
[10:28] <infinity> Snark: Not sure, no, and not at home right now to look.
[10:30] <Snark> ok ; when can I ping you again to know?
[10:32] <infinity> Tuesday, or try talking to SteveMcIntyre, I vaguely recall that he was looking into (or having someone look into) the binutils bug.
[10:32] <infinity> Anyhow, the patch is harmless when used with old binutils, so if you want to submit it to upstream(s), go ahead.
[10:33] <Snark> infinity: ok
[10:36] <hrw> ok, chromebook users will have to wait for 13.10
[10:45] <ogra_> hrw, why ?
[10:45] <ogra_> vboot-utils just went in
[10:46] <hrw> o. I got rejection email so though badly
[10:46] <ogra_> i see it on -changes
[10:46] <hrw> ok, so one thing less to worry
[10:46] <ogra_> :)
[10:48] <infinity> hrw: I synced it instead of taking your fake sync.
[10:48] <infinity> hrw: Should have mentioned that.
[10:48] <marvin24> janimo: I'm looking for a sponsor: https://launchpad.net/~marvin24/+archive/ppa
[10:52] <hrw> infinity: I should check debian new first
[11:11] <janimo> marvin24, ack, I do not have time ATM though and my ac100's wifi broke months ago
[11:11] <janimo> but I hope I'll get some time this week and I may be able to test then
[11:12] <ogra_> note that thursday is final freeze
[11:14] <janimo> ogra_, yes I know we are close to release. Just that I have no time for distro stuff lately and my ac100 is gathering dust :)
[11:14] <ogra_> same here
[11:16] <marvin24> next kernel will be multiarch
[11:16] <diwic> mine too! shall we setup a computing cluster of dust-collecting ac100s?
[11:16] <marvin24> so I hope no need anymore for ac100 specific kernels
[11:16] <marvin24> it's not the fault of the ac100 that it collects dust
[11:17] <janimo> marvin24, indeed, in my case the availability of more powerful and convenient linux arm machines
[11:17] <janimo> that plus ac100' hw failure
[11:17] <marvin24> my wifi and 3g modem also died in one of my machines
[11:18] <marvin24> seems to be a hw bug or so
[11:19] <marvin24> will ubuntu powered  ARM servers also use the android kernel?
[11:19]  * marvin24 hopes not
[11:20] <janimo> marvin24, no
[11:20] <janimo> mobile uses android kernels as those are the only ones that support the hw
[11:23]  * ogra_ sees janimo's mail and wonders why the maguro image should work on an ac100 
[11:24] <janimo> ogra_, he said he tested maguro
[11:24] <marvin24> maguro?
[11:24] <ogra_> oh, i see
[11:24] <janimo> marvin24, on the phone mailing list unrelated
[11:24] <ogra_> he went offtopic in his ownb thread :P
[11:24] <janimo> well, the topic is black screen and errors in logcat
[11:24] <janimo> which quite a few devices seem to share
[11:24] <janimo> incuding one I have been looking at
[11:24] <ogra_> ah
[11:25] <ogra_> well, he started with his ac100 issue ... i didnt even know he does more than ac100 and HP touchpad
[11:25] <janimo> no idea why though, maybe phablet and android 4.0 binaries not being compatible
[11:25] <ogra_> well, CM 10.1 is 4.2.2
[11:25] <ogra_> or 4.2 at least
[11:25] <janimo> I think it's only the last mail he said he also tested gnex to rule out other issues
[11:25] <janimo> 4.2.1 indeed
[11:26] <ogra_> yep ... just looked through the thread again
[11:26] <janimo> not sure what gothas there are with 4.0 binaries
[11:26] <ogra_> different toolchain/bionic ?
[11:27] <ogra_> though i know the maguro images are regulary tested in house ... so that should definitely work
[11:28] <janimo> the vendor bits need to be added manually since they are not in the tree, that can be a common reason for buildable but nonworking images
[11:28] <janimo> but let's see what he answers
[11:29] <janimo> I also cannot get nexus4 to boot now but I could previously, need to track down why, (also forgot vendor blobs at one point)
[11:30] <ogra_> well, does it work with the cdimage image ?
[11:30] <janimo> testing now :)
[11:30] <ogra_> :)
[11:31] <ogra_> these images are definitely regulary tested
[11:31] <janimo> it worked with a build I had done last week, now I did a fresh build on a different machine and this one does not work
[11:31] <ogra_> so at least the friday build should be good
[11:31] <janimo> right, I know they are supposed to wor
[11:31] <ogra_> (i doubt anyone actively tests on weekends)