ppisati | moin | 07:39 |
---|---|---|
smb | wiki | 07:40 |
=== amitk is now known as amitk-afk | ||
* apw yawns | 08:17 | |
czajkowski | apw: morning to you too | 08:25 |
apw | he | 08:26 |
apw | heh | 08:26 |
ppisati | brb | 08:50 |
* ppisati -> out for an early lunch | 10:14 | |
=== amitk is now known as amitk-afk | ||
* henrix starts to think it was a bad idea to try to bring the efi patches into 3.5.y | 12:39 | |
rtg | apw, ogasawara: just pushed Ubuntu-3.8.0-19.29 w/v3.8.7 and v3.8.8. gonna build and smoke test for a few hours on various bits of kit before uploading. | 12:47 |
ogasawara | rtg: ack | 12:47 |
ogasawara | rtg: lemme know when you have a test build and I can throw it at some of the kit I have here too | 12:47 |
rtg | ogasawara, will do. that reminds me, I should update some chroots since we have a new binutils. | 12:48 |
=== amitk-afk is now known as amitk | ||
ppisati | rtg: i just sent a fix for R/master-next, and then i've another one coming today | 13:13 |
rtg | ppisati, ok | 13:13 |
* rtg reboots for kernel update | 13:15 | |
* cking can't ack patches quick enough today | 13:34 | |
* henrix -> back in 15 | 13:43 | |
=== hggdh_ is now known as hggdh | ||
ogasawara | ahh the joys of a 2yr old crashing a meeting | 14:43 |
* ogasawara back in 20 | 14:43 | |
rtg | ogasawara, I guess you were done, huh? whether you wanted to be or not. | 14:45 |
ppisati | rtg: last fix sent to the ml, with this applied, i'm done with R. | 14:54 |
rtg | ppisati, ack. good timing. | 14:54 |
ppisati | :) | 14:54 |
=== kentb is now known as kentb-afk | ||
rtg | bjf, do you remember if we have some wiki info on kernel versioning ? | 15:19 |
* rtg is too busy listening to Rush to be bothered to look for himself. | 15:20 | |
bjf | rtg, not that i know but it would be a good thing | 15:21 |
rtg | bjf, seems like we have to explain our versioning scheme every so often | 15:22 |
robher | rtg, ppisati: I've got a fix for the highbank reset issue. I'll be sending it out to lakml soon as I can write a decent commit msg. It's heavily tested to work 3 out of 3 times. | 15:23 |
rtg | robher, I thought that was the PL310_ERRATA_769419 thingy ? | 15:24 |
ppisati | rtg: that was a workaround | 15:24 |
ppisati | rtg: in case the fix didn't make for the release | 15:24 |
rtg | ppisati, well, I think we'll stick with the workaround until after release, OK ? | 15:24 |
ppisati | rtg: i'm good with it | 15:24 |
rtg | robher, you too ? | 15:25 |
robher | rtg: That's not the real problem. It just makes the issue 100% reproducible. It is still possible to hit it on reset or cpu hotplug. | 15:25 |
rtg | *sigh* - we're getting kind of close to the wire | 15:27 |
robher | Errata 769419 is the fix for that USB performance issue on Panda that Canonical spent a long time root causing. | 15:27 |
rtg | thats why it looked familiar | 15:28 |
bjf | rtg, i'm working on that version wiki "problem" | 15:34 |
rtg | huh :) imagine that. | 15:35 |
bjf | rtg, read https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/FAQ#Kernel.2BAC8-FAQ.2BAC8-GeneralVersionMeaning.What_does_a_specific_Ubuntu_kernel_version_number_mean.3F and the following 3 sections | 15:38 |
bjf | rtg, i don't think this matches your email though i believe your email is correct | 15:38 |
rtg | bjf, perhaps we could add some of that email to the section 'What differentiates the Ubuntu Kernel from the upstream Linux Kernel?' | 15:40 |
bjf | rtg, i don't think the other sections are exactly correct either since 3.0 but i can start with your suggestion | 15:42 |
* cking --> back later, car stuff to do | 15:43 | |
=== kentb-afk is now known as kentb | ||
rtg | robher, can I set CONFIG_PL310_ERRATA_769419=y after applying your patch 'ARM: highbank: fix cache flush ordering for cpu hotplug' ? | 15:53 |
ppisati | robher: ok, saw the patch | 15:53 |
rtg | ppisati, you gonna test a kernel with this patch and PL310_ERRATA_769419=y ? | 16:00 |
bjf | rtg, i didn't change much from your email ... https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/FAQ/GeneralUbuntuDelta | 16:03 |
rtg | bjf, looks good. thanks. | 16:04 |
ppisati | rtg: ok, patch sent as a followup | 16:15 |
rtg | ppisati, I repushed master-next. have a look to make sure I have it correct | 16:16 |
ppisati | rtg: yes it is | 16:17 |
wolfgang8741 | I was asked to test an upstream version for 3.9-rc7, but no amd64 build is listed in the directory. Are the mainline kernel building of 3.9-rc7 complete (http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v3.9-rc7-raring/)? I saw the release announcement saying the building is complete (https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2013-April/027614.html), but not all architectures display on the site. | 16:29 |
rtg | apw, ^^ | 16:31 |
bjf | psivaa, all kernels are through verification. i know you folks are going to be pretty busy next week so if you wanted to get a jump on them you can | 16:46 |
psivaa | bjf: ok, thanks for the info. one of our servers is down. will get going once that comes up | 16:46 |
* ppisati -> out for the usual routine | 17:11 | |
ppisati | back later | 17:11 |
* rtg -> lunch | 17:27 | |
apw | wolfgang8741, if there are no binaries for an arch it likely did not complete | 17:49 |
apw | kamal, it is all your fault :) | 17:53 |
apw | rtg, it is the new module dependancies checker | 17:53 |
rtg | apw, which is why mainline isn't building ? | 17:54 |
apw | it is aborting the amd64 build | 17:54 |
apw | rtg yes | 17:54 |
rtg | apw, why are you building an extras package ? | 17:54 |
apw | WARNING: /home/apw/COD/linux/debian/linux-image-3.9.0-030900rc7-generic/lib/modules/3.9.0-030900rc7-generic/kernel/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/e1000e.ko needs unknown symbol ptp_clock_index | 17:54 |
apw | WARNING: /home/apw/COD/linux/debian/linux-image-3.9.0-030900rc7-generic/lib/modules/3.9.0-030900rc7-generic/kernel/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/e1000e.ko needs unknown symbol ptp_clock_register | 17:54 |
apw | WARNING: /home/apw/COD/linux/debian/linux-image-3.9.0-030900rc7-generic/lib/modules/3.9.0-030900rc7-generic/kernel/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/e1000e.ko needs unknown symbol ptp_clock_unregister | 17:54 |
apw | EE: Unresolved module dependencies in base package! | 17:54 |
apw | make: *** [install-generic] Error 1 | 17:54 |
apw | rtg, it builds wahtever the primary would build, which is split in that release | 17:55 |
kamal | apw: my fault? what'd I do!? | 17:55 |
rtg | apw, the LTS kernels only build one package. maybe mainline should do the same ? | 17:55 |
apw | i suspect i need to find this new check and wack it in mainline builds | 17:57 |
apw | rtg, yeah i think i can just wack do_extras_package=false | 17:57 |
apw | and be happy | 17:57 |
apw | kamal, wasn't this your doing: | 17:58 |
apw | EE: Unresolved module dependencies in base package! | 17:58 |
rtg | apw, I think that was an smb patch, not kamal. | 17:58 |
kamal | apw: I don't think so -- I'm not the droid you're looking for | 17:58 |
apw | kamal, :) | 17:58 |
kamal | apw: but hey, thanks for thinking of me, man! ;-) | 17:58 |
apw | kamal, i always do ... always do | 18:02 |
wolfgang8741 | apw, thanks knew something might have broke | 18:04 |
rtg | ogasawara, uploaded raring. I'm outta here to recycle some HW. | 19:00 |
ogasawara | rtg: ack, thanks | 19:01 |
* rtg -> EOD | 19:01 | |
smallfoot- | Linux 3.8.8 released today | 20:02 |
=== mathor is now known as crhrabal | ||
jsalisbury | bjf: File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/launchpadlib/launchpad.py", line 28, | 20:18 |
jsalisbury | in <module> | 20:18 |
jsalisbury | from lazr.uri import URI | 20:18 |
jsalisbury | ImportError: No module named uri | 20:18 |
bjf | jsalisbury, http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/5716959/ | 20:19 |
=== hggdh_ is now known as hggdh | ||
=== kentb is now known as kentb-out |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!