[10:28] <tjaalton> how come we have a bug report about nvidia-319?
[10:29] <mlankhorst> because people are insane
[10:29] <ricotz> tjaalton, probably someone using xedgers
[10:30] <tjaalton> ok, where do I throw it then?
[10:30] <tjaalton> in the 'invalid' bin?
[10:32] <ricotz> tjaalton, probably a misconfigured optimus setup
[10:32] <ricotz> tjaalton, so i guess unsupported/invalid then
[10:35] <tjaalton> yeah, closed
[11:37] <tseliot> ricotz: I have packaged the nvidia-modprobe tool which nvidia-319 requires. Is it already in edgers? Shall I upload it there?
[11:38] <ricotz> tseliot, hi, it isnt in edgers, feel free to upload it there with a matching version suffix
[11:39] <tseliot> ricotz: ok, good
[11:40] <ricotz> tseliot, i hope it is debsrc3?
[11:40] <ricotz> nvidia-settings should be transformed to it too, so the original upstream bz2 tarball can be used
[11:41] <tseliot> ricotz: yep, the file says 3.0 (quilt)
[11:41] <ricotz> good :)
[11:41] <tseliot> ricotz: yes, I can do that too
[15:35] <bjsnider> tjaalton, it was reported on a package called nvidia-319?
[15:42] <ricotz> bjsnider, xedgers contains those
[15:45] <bjsnider> ricotz, you said above that it wasn't in edgers
[15:45] <bjsnider> or did you just mean the modprobe thing?
[15:46] <ricotz> bjsnider, i mean the nvidia-319 package
[15:52] <tjaalton> bjsnider: it mentioned nvidia-319
[15:52] <tjaalton> against xorg
[16:11] <mlankhorst> and with that horrible hack posted on the switching stack bug, I declare EOD
[18:33] <tjaalton> omg, bug 1170074
[18:33] <ubottu> bug 1170074 in mesa (Ubuntu) "April 17 Mesa update introduced regressions" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1170074
[18:34] <tjaalton> a game doesn't work on nouveau
[18:36] <tjaalton> updated the headline
[18:38] <mlankhorst> meh ill look tomorrow
[18:38] <mlankhorst> finally something interesting nouveau wise ;D
[18:42] <smallfoot-> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/1170074
[18:42] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1170074 in mesa (Ubuntu) "mesa 9.1 regressed Tibia on nouveau" [Undecided,New]
[18:42] <smallfoot-> April 17 Mesa update introduced regressions
[18:43] <tjaalton> ha, updated the headline already ;)
[18:43] <smallfoot-> I am on a GeForce 8600 using nouvoue driver, Tibia worked yesterday, today it doesn't
[18:43] <smallfoot-> ah, I see
[18:43] <smallfoot-> yeah, I don't know if its just on nouvoue or on across the board of all Mesa
[18:44] <mlankhorst> is there a demo or something?
[18:44] <smallfoot-> yes
[18:44] <smallfoot-> http://static.tibia.com/download/tibia985.tgz
[18:44] <smallfoot-> around 25 mb
[18:44] <tjaalton> url on the bug
[18:44] <smallfoot-> it segfaults on startup
[18:44] <smallfoot-> commercial proprietary game by CipSoft GmbH, german company, the executable is clean
[18:45] <tjaalton> pastebin the segfault?
[18:45] <mlankhorst> It's eod, but I'll look at it first thing in the morning..
[18:45] <smallfoot-> the segfault is just "Segmentation fault", nothing more
[18:45] <smallfoot-> eod?
[18:45] <smallfoot-> end of day? oh, I see
[18:45] <tjaalton> here it just complains about libGL.so.1
[18:46] <smallfoot-> oh sorry, I forgot to mention that
[18:46] <smallfoot-> if you're on ubuntu 64, you might need to install ia32libs
[18:46] <tjaalton> k
[18:46] <smallfoot-> as the tibia binary is 32-bit only
[18:47] <mlankhorst> tjaalton: dont you dare ;P
[18:47] <tjaalton> heh
[18:53] <tjaalton> works fine on intel anyway
[18:54] <mlankhorst> good!
[18:54] <mlankhorst> I was afraid I'd have to break into your home and leave your toilet seat up, then you'd get in trouble with your significant other, bahahha
[18:57] <tjaalton> she's not around
[18:57] <tjaalton> :)
[18:57] <tjaalton> kids are, but asleep by now
[18:57] <tjaalton> apitrace doesn't seem to work
[18:58] <tjaalton> so I'll just skip and let you deal with it tomorrow
[19:02] <smallfoot-> so its nouvoue specific, possibly nv50 specific
[19:04] <bryce> smallfoot-, can you run `gdb Tibia`, then `bt full` and paste the output of that into the bug?
[19:04] <smallfoot-> Okay
[19:04] <smallfoot-> "No stack."
[19:04] <smallfoot-> :(
[19:06] <bryce> smallfoot-, ah sorry, do `run`, then let it crash, and then do `bt full`
[19:06] <smallfoot-> oh
[19:10] <smallfoot-> http://paste.ubuntu.com/5716784/
[19:12] <bryce> smallfoot-, thanks that's helpful.  Mind a few more steps to gather some extra data?
[19:12] <smallfoot-> sure
[19:14] <bryce> smallfoot-, apt-get install libgl1-mesa-dri:i386 xserver-xorg-core-dbg 
[19:14] <bryce> smallfoot-, then repeat the procedure (gdb Tibia, run, then bt full)
[19:14] <bryce> er wait
[19:15] <bryce> smallfoot-, apt-get install libgl1-mesa-dri-dbg:i386 xserver-xorg-core-dbg 
[19:15] <bryce> smallfoot-, then repeat the procedure (gdb Tibia, run, then bt full)
[19:15] <mlankhorst> don't you need libgl1-mesa-glx-dbg:i386 too?
[19:16] <bryce> couldn't hurt, but looks like most symbols are in the dri pkg
[19:17] <smallfoot-> should i get libgl1-mesa-glx-dbg:i386 too?
[19:17] <bryce> smallfoot-, sure, why not.  
[19:17] <bryce> the more -dbg's the merrier
[19:17] <bryce> :-)
[19:17] <smallfoot-> ok :)
[19:17] <bryce> bbiab (lunch)
[19:21] <smallfoot-> http://paste.ubuntu.com/5716822/ -- backtrace with debug libraries
[19:54] <bryce> smallfoot-, perfect, thanks
[19:54] <smallfoot-> :)
[19:59] <bryce>          tmp = 0x4 <Address 0x4 out of bounds>
[20:00] <smallfoot-> *clueless*
[20:00] <smallfoot-> hmm adress out of bounds sounds bad :s
[20:03] <bryce> yup
[20:04] <bryce> question is why it's set to '4'
[20:05] <bryce> (memory addresses usually look like 0x88e6e08)
[20:08] <mlankhorst> no, my mesa bug, and I'll look at it tomorrow :'(
[20:14] <bryce> fine :-)
[20:26] <bryce> tjaalton, mesa 9.1.1 changes not pushed to git?
[20:27] <tjaalton> bryce: still on ubuntu+1
[20:27] <bryce> mlankhorst:
[20:27] <bryce>   * Add some more patches to fix image copy regressions on nouveau.
[20:27] <bryce> ^ would help to list what patches were added, for grepping purposes.
[20:28] <mlankhorst> I thought I just lazily copied them to debian/patches/series
[20:28] <tjaalton> the four patches on series
[20:28] <tjaalton> oh hell
[20:28] <tjaalton> it still has the patches from anholt commented out :D
[20:29] <tjaalton> shouldn't be there at all
[20:29] <mlankhorst> [Supermassive fail (instant)]
[20:29] <bryce> seems there's some cruft too... patch 116 not in series, and there's two 118's
[20:30] <mlankhorst> second one needs to be removed
[20:30] <mlankhorst> merge failure
[20:30] <mlankhorst> 116 was kept for historical reasons, can be dropped
[20:30] <tjaalton> I don't have those here
[20:30] <tjaalton> so probably local cruft?
[20:31] <smallfoot-> new minor X.org Server was released today, it contains security fix
[20:32] <mlankhorst> yeah and unless you plug in usb devices and chvt, you won't hit it..
[20:32] <bryce> tjaalton, ah was looking at the wrong branch
[20:32] <smallfoot-> Ubuntu has updated their X.org Server?
[20:32] <bryce> seem to be cleaned up on ubuntu+1.  just need to merge that to ubuntu.
[20:33] <mlankhorst> I don't know, but it makes me want to look for more vulnerabilities in xserver, to get sru's done faster..
[20:34] <tjaalton> bryce: yes, actually the other way around, then push the result as ubuntu
[20:34] <tjaalton> with additional force
[20:34] <tjaalton> if needed
[20:38] <tjaalton> actually, easiest is to just add the changelog entry and force push it then as ubuntu
[20:38] <tjaalton> merging old upstream there ends up in misery
[20:39] <tjaalton> nevermind, old 'merge -s ours' trick worked
[20:41] <tjaalton> pushing it
[20:41] <tjaalton> there
[20:42] <tjaalton> now pull, and use the ubuntu branch for changes
[20:45] <Prf_Jakob> Hmm so I tried the beta2 CD on my MacBookPro5.1, in the past I have allways needed to use nomodeset but the X server at least start in the installer now it doesn't start :-/
[20:48] <tjaalton> does it work without nomodeset?
[20:48] <Prf_Jakob> nope, nouveau fails to set the mode
[20:49] <mlankhorst> it would be nice if you come up with those things before it's so close to release ;P
[20:49] <Prf_Jakob> haha :p
[20:49] <Prf_Jakob> the nouveau thing is a old bug.
[20:49] <Prf_Jakob> happens on 12.10
[20:50] <Prf_Jakob> actually looks like I lied, X doesn't start on the 12.10 installer either.
[20:50] <Prf_Jakob> Which is weird because I'm pretty sure I installed it via the gui...
[20:54] <Prf_Jakob> okay got X to work by installing nvidia-current
[20:59] <bjsnider> Prf_Jakob, what nvidia chip does the crackbook have?
[21:01] <Prf_Jakob> its a 9400GT/9600GT combo
[21:01] <bjsnider> surprised there's  nouveau issue on that
[21:01] <Prf_Jakob> http://www.everymac.com/systems/apple/macbook/specs/macbook-core-2-duo-2.4-aluminum-13-late-2008-unibody-specs.html
[21:01] <Prf_Jakob> ops no
[21:04] <bjsnider> isn't the 5.1 newer than 2008?
[21:04] <Prf_Jakob> http://everymac.com/systems/apple/macbook_pro/specs/macbook-pro-core-2-duo-2.8-aluminum-15-late-2008-unibody-specs.html
[21:04] <Prf_Jakob> nope
[21:04] <Prf_Jakob> I think there is a 2009 model as well
[21:04] <Prf_Jakob> ^ thats what I got anyways