=== idnaria is now known as idnar
[12:22] <kelkoobenoitr> hello. I have my first source package uploaded and building nicely in launchpad for precise (i386/amd64)
[12:23] <kelkoobenoitr> now i want to tell launchpad to build it for quantal
[12:25] <kelkoobenoitr> i have been told (by xnox) yesterday to add a new changelog, that should create a new dsc and then dput it.
[12:25] <kelkoobenoitr> here is what i did:
[12:26] <kelkoobenoitr> dch -v 0.3.1-3 (with the same version number as the precise version)
[12:26] <kelkoobenoitr> debuild -us -uc
[12:26] <kelkoobenoitr> debuild -S -sa
[12:27] <kelkoobenoitr> dput ppa:name/package package_0.3.1-3_source.changes
[12:27] <kelkoobenoitr> and i got this message:
[12:27] <kelkoobenoitr> Package has already been uploaded to ppa on ppa.launchpad.net
[12:27] <kelkoobenoitr> Nothing more to do for slowmovideo_0.3.1-3_source.changes
[12:28] <kelkoobenoitr> What am i doing wrong ?
[12:28] <kelkoobenoitr> or how should i tell launchpad to build my package for quantal
[12:32] <StevenK> kelkoobenoitr: The same version number will cause it to be rejected
[12:32] <kelkoobenoitr> so i should give different versions if i want to release the code for precise and quantal ?
[12:33] <kelkoobenoitr> like 0.3.1-3~precise1 and 0.3.1-3~quantal1 ?
[12:34] <StevenK> Yes
[12:35] <kelkoobenoitr> thx
[12:37] <xnox> kelkoobenoitr: also that error message was from dput arguing that it noticed a ".upload" file. You can remove it, or pass --force to dput. Then it would be uploaded to the PPA, but rejected if there is same version in the ppa already.
[12:38] <kelkoobenoitr> ok thx
=== wedgwood_away is now known as wedgwood
=== Mkaysi is now known as Ciblia
[14:09] <petrus_>  i have a poor performance on ubuntu gnome 13.04
[14:09] <petrus_> my laptop uses optimus graphics
[14:09] <petrus_> installed nvidia bumbleebee but did't reconized nvidia
=== Ciblia is now known as Mkaysi
[14:10] <czajkowski> petrus_: this isn't a support area for ubuntu
[14:10] <petrus_> ah nederlands hier
[14:10] <czajkowski> petrus_: you'll have more luck in #ubuntu
[14:10] <petrus_> oke np bye
[16:34] <mmcc`> Hi - can anyone tell me more about the status of staging.launchpad.net? It looks like it's been down for code update for a long time, maybe days.
[16:35] <mmcc`> I'm working on some software-center code that makes use of sc.staging.ubuntu.com, which talks to staging.lp, so unfortunately this is blocking me right now
[16:40] <czajkowski> mmcc`: hasn't been down for days
[16:41] <czajkowski> let me go get it poked
[16:42] <mmcc`> czajkowski: thanks! And yes, I only have evidence that it's been down for a few hours, but I was getting errors from sc.staging that I thought might have been due to this earlier. Sorry for the false alarm
[16:49] <xnox> czajkowski: is there any way for devs to reply to bad reviews in the software center?
[16:50] <czajkowski> xnox: hmm
[16:50] <czajkowski> cant you also leave feedback there
[16:50] <czajkowski> or contact the developer
[16:50] <czajkowski> davmor2: may know more
[16:50] <davmor2> meh
[16:51] <xnox> czajkowski: it's just some "John" left a bad review, and the developer want to help "John" yet there is no way to contact "John".
[16:52] <xnox> czajkowski: as far as gather. the developer already left a review / "reply to somebody elses problems", and thus can't leave yet another review.
[16:53] <davmor2> xnox: Not that I am aware of give me a second though
[16:53] <davmor2> xnox: also #software-center would be the better place as it is nothing to do with LP :)
[16:55] <xnox> davmor2: i really have no idea who/where/what the reviews are done.
[16:57] <davmor2> xnox: so NO.  About the best thing he can do is write a review for it answering but you can only write one review per app iirc
[16:58] <davmor2> xnox: he will of signed in using SSO but that doesn't mean the user has a lp account, but he might be able to look the user up on LP and see if the users LP page lists contact details
=== TRB143_ is now known as TRB143
=== deryck is now known as deryck[lunch]
[18:47] <mmcc`> hi, since it's late for c-zajkowski , can anyone else look at why staging.launchpad.net is down? Thanks!
[18:53] <davmor2> mmcc`: there is czajkowski and then there is Australia I have no idea when they are on.
[18:54] <dobey> give it a few hours
[18:54] <dobey> then they'll start popping up, like spring daisies
[18:54] <mmcc`> :D I'll keep an eye out
[18:55] <davmor2> mmcc`: However czajkowski is awesome, but don't tell her I said that!  and will let them know first thing if it isn't up by the time she is :)
[18:56] <czajkowski> mmcc`: wont be up for a while
[18:56] <czajkowski> mmcc`: https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1170440
[18:56] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1170440 in Launchpad itself "Staging Launchpad build process is trying to easy_install from internet which is blocked by egress firewall rules" [Critical,Triaged]
[18:56] <mmcc`> davmor2: your secret is safe with me
[18:56] <mmcc`> czajkowski: ah, ok. thanks - I'll keep an eye on that bug, then.
[18:57] <davmor2> mmcc`: See I told you ;)  but mums the word
=== czajkowski changed the topic of #launchpad to: Known issues: Staging.launchpad.net is currently down | Requesting ARM builds on PPAs - https://dev.launchpad.net/CommunityARMBuilds | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad
=== deryck[lunch] is now known as deryck
[22:19] <wgrant> mmcc`: Staging is back
[22:19] <mmcc`> wgrant: indeed it is! thanks for the ping :)
=== czajkowski changed the topic of #launchpad to: Known issues:-| Requesting ARM builds on PPAs - https://dev.launchpad.net/CommunityARMBuilds | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad
=== hggdh_ is now known as hggdh
=== wedgwood is now known as wedgwood_away