[15:24] <joao> hi, can i install ubuntu on 3g Nexus 7 already?
[15:25] <ogra_> sure
[15:25] <joao> i am asking because the last time i tried it was unsupported
[15:27] <ogra_> that must have been quite a while ago then
[15:28] <joao> hm about 2 months ago
[15:29] <ogra_> well, it has been supported 2 months ago
[15:29] <darkfader> joao: did your question also include "does 3g *work"?
[15:29] <ogra_> i dont think anyone has touched that image in several months
[15:30] <ogra_> (and i definitely fixed the installer issues that made installs impossible around december)
[15:30] <joao> darkfader: no, i merely want to use ubuntu. no need for 3g. However i wasnt able to install it when i tried, it sayed unsupported device "nakasig" (i think)
[15:30] <ogra_> oh, you talk about ubuntu touch
[15:31] <ogra_> better go to the #ubuntu-touch channel :)
[15:31]  * ogra_ was thinking you talk about the nexus7 desktop image 
[15:32] <joao> hm ok, maybe i'm mixing things up. There are two ways of having ubuntu on my nexus?
[15:32] <ogra_> there is ubuntu touch ...  and there is a desktop image which isnt touch optimized
[15:33] <ogra_> the desktop image definitely doesnt care about crazy names like nakasig
[15:33] <ogra_> touch does, but you can just force the grouper image to be used
[15:33] <ogra_> which is essentially the same
[15:34] <joao> hum ok, thanks that answered my question
[15:34] <joao> questions, actually
[15:47] <plars> ogra_: I've got two nexus7's in the lab that seem to always hang on reboot, not sure if it's on the way down or the way back up at the moment, but I can't ssh after I reboot over ssh
[15:47] <plars> ogra_: have you seen anything like that?
[15:48] <ogra_> only for devices that are out of power
[15:48] <ogra_> they actually can go into a reboot loop in the bootloader
[16:04] <plars> ogra_: no, it's plugged into a wall wart
[16:04] <plars> ogra_: and someone in the lab says it appears to be on, and has the right ip address, trying to see if they can look at it further
[16:23] <dannf> infinity, ogra_: i added two patches to #1170515 - only difference is that one keeps highbank as a recognizable subflavour, other continues to drop it
[16:25] <ogra_> dannf, well, i personally dont care either way buut would like it consistent
[16:25] <dannf> ogra_: both are self-consistent imo. as i explained in the comment, the only reason i didn't drop highbank from f-k .deb is for upgrades
[16:26] <dannf> ogra_: but i can see reasons for wanting to keep that support in f-k too (backporting, perhaps switching libd-i back to recognizing highbank as highbank)
[16:27] <dannf> but both should function the same for raring
[16:30] <infinity> dannf: I prefer the first patch.
[16:30] <infinity> dannf: There's no reason for the second, IMO.
[16:31] <dannf> wfm
[16:31]  * dannf just covering bases :)
[16:31] <infinity> Also, way to get in just under the line. :P
[16:31] <infinity> dannf: f-k isn't built into d-i, right, it fetches the udeb on the fly?
[16:32] <dannf> infinity: correct
[16:32] <dannf> and that's the problem here, d-i doesn't see generic listed in Packages.gz for f-k-i
[16:32] <ogra_> bug #1170515
[16:32] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1170515 in flash-kernel (Ubuntu) "flash-kernel-installer: not installable on generic" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1170515
[16:32] <ogra_> thats the one, right ?
[16:33] <infinity> Right.
[16:33] <infinity> Uploading now.
[16:33] <infinity> For S, we'll fiddle all this crap a bit harder, but this works for now.
[16:33] <infinity> I didn't want to mangle s/omap/generic/ all over this late in the cycle.
[16:34] <ogra_> infinity, so which patch did you take ? the one that keeps it
[16:34] <infinity> ogra_: Hrm?  The one that does s/highbank/generic/ in the subarch list.
[16:35] <ogra_> hmm, k
[16:35]  * ogra_ would have liked it to be consistent ... but whtever
[16:35] <infinity> It is.  There's no highbank flavour anymore.
[16:35] <ogra_> oh
[16:35] <ogra_> ok
[16:35] <ogra_> wrong angle here :)
[16:36] <ogra_> then i'm happy :)