[01:23] <bjsnider> i don't understand the alias created by the fglrx package. it says "alias fglrx fglrx"
[01:23] <bjsnider> that whole section of the rules file is weird
[01:24] <bjsnider> it's using variables, but they're being filled manually, not from out-of-control stuff
[01:24] <bjsnider> i guess it would make sense if there was an alternate package with a different name than fglrx, like fglrx-updates or whatever
[01:25] <bjsnider> but those could be different packaging scripts with different code
[01:32] <bjsnider> PKG_driver      := fglrx
[01:32] <bjsnider> PKG_module      := $(shell echo "$(PKG_driver)" | sed s/\-/_/g)
[01:32] <bjsnider> don't know why that sed is in there
[01:33] <bjsnider> it yields fglrx
[01:33] <bjsnider> alias fglrx $(PKG_module)
[01:33] <bjsnider> that is alias fglrx fglrx
[04:40] <mlankhorst> morning
[08:07] <tjaalton> mlankhorst: new test branch from whot
[08:10] <mlankhorst> \o/
[08:11] <mlankhorst> oh and he fixed up the conflict correctly now, good :)
[08:12] <tjaalton> it's rebased with master I think
[08:12] <tjaalton> the branch
[08:14] <mlankhorst>     dix: always copy grabs, don't reference them
[08:14] <mlankhorst> that one should fix the issue I was facing
[08:14] <mlankhorst>     FIXME dix: remove TouchListenerGone hook
[08:14] <mlankhorst> don't know about that one, seems to be a hack
[08:18] <mlankhorst> ok let me build this on the n7
[08:23] <tjaalton> building it straight or backported to 1.13+
[08:23] <tjaalton> ?
[08:23] <mlankhorst> straight + reverts
[08:24] <tjaalton> right
[08:24] <mlankhorst> I applied the reverts first then merged it in again
[08:29] <mlankhorst> ok, nexus seems to be working now
[08:29] <mlankhorst> lets see if i can build it..
[09:14] <tjaalton> huh, unpacking ubuntu-docs seems to kill i/o on my machines
[09:23] <mlankhorst> woops, forgot to enable debug, it doesn't crash but it seems that it still fails on touch after a while
[09:23] <tjaalton> bah
[09:24] <tjaalton> thanks for testing
[09:24] <tjaalton> i've now uploaded plymouth to -proposed
[09:24] <mlankhorst> or well, right away
[09:24] <tjaalton> lightdm follows
[09:24] <mlankhorst> I'll try with --enable-debug
[09:24] <mlankhorst> \o/
[09:24] <mlankhorst> fwiw, if we have the libdrm sru verified we could upload lts-raring to precise
[09:25] <tjaalton> yeah
[09:25] <mlankhorst> it builds on i386 and amd64, I disabled build for armel/armhf since that was unsupported anyway
[09:37] <tjaalton> nice, apt-get autoremove cleans up old kernels
[09:37] <tjaalton> also, it just occurred to me that I hadn't tested the new plymouth job on my desktop at all, before now :)
[09:38] <tjaalton> 3/3 successful boots though
[09:38] <tjaalton> 4
[09:39] <tjaalton> after the tenth I'll call it a success and upload lightdm too
[09:39] <mlankhorst> yay
[09:43] <tjaalton> 10
[11:53] <mlankhorst> I guess I'll go verify libdrm works across all we care about..
[13:21] <tjaalton> mlankhorst: add your findings to the touch bug :)
[13:22] <mlankhorst> I told whot in private, he knows
[13:22] <mlankhorst> 11:43 <whot> really? that's a new instance of that bug then because it passes all the tests
[13:22] <mlankhorst> 11:43 <whot> well, all except one, which is probably what you're seeing
[13:22] <mlankhorst> 11:44 <whot> actually, that even makes sense - you triggered the bug when ungrabbing during a touch point and that's the test case I just added and it fails atm
[13:24] <mlankhorst> it was the same testcase that crashed before :-)
[13:26] <tjaalton> ah, good