[01:06] <hallyn> is there a library to do things like btrfs subvolume list from c code (without defining and using the ioctls myself)?
[02:06] <hallyn> woohoo, found it
[03:25] <RAOF> hallyn: Oooh, what is it?
[03:26] <hallyn> RAOF: well to detect subvolume, just (st.st_ino == 256) && S_ISDIR(st.st_mode)
[03:26] <hallyn> detecting valid fs and creating subvolume snapshots, i'm using ioctls for, but it's not too bad.
[03:28] <RAOF> Ah, ok. That's less interesting than actually finding a library to do that.
[03:28] <RAOF> :)
[03:29] <hallyn> oh yeah.  which is unfortunate, as i'm having to copy struct definitions from btrfs-tools source into my program
[03:29] <hallyn> a btrfs-dev pkg would be nice
[10:18]  * ppisati -> workout (back later)
[11:36]  * henrix -> lunch
[12:46]  * rtg fixes quantal build problem. some doofus forgot to getabi after last startnewrelease
[12:48] <rtg> (which was me)
[14:01] <brendand> sconklin, hi
[14:02] <sconklin> brendand: what's up?
[14:02] <brendand> sconklin, understand you're chasing some regressions?
[14:03] <sconklin> brendand: yes
[14:03] <brendand> sconklin, we've got a system that won't boot with the -proposed kernel
[14:04] <brendand> sconklin, however my understanding is that the regressions you're looking at occur with the -updates kernel
[14:04] <bjf> brendand, P or Q ?
[14:05] <brendand> bjf, ours is in P, with 3.2 kernel
[14:06] <brendand> bjf, we're raising a bug right now
[14:06] <bjf> brendand, http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~bradf/lp1169380/upstream-01/  try that kernel
[14:13] <brendand> bjf, as a side note, this system booted fine with -updates. possibility we're looking at an entirely different problem
[14:17] <bjf> brendand, yup, a test will help tell us
[15:21] <bjf> brendand, how did that kernel test go?
[15:25] <brendand> bjf, in progress
[15:50] <jodh> anyone have thoughts on what might be causing bug 1172322? I'm pretty sure it isn't upstart.
[15:50] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1172322 in linux (Ubuntu) "kernel panic on boot" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1172322
[15:52] <rtg> jodh, can you get the whole trace ? I think the important part scrolled off the top.
[15:53] <jodh> rtg - it's gone I'm afraid - I had to get the machine online asap. sorry.
[15:54] <rtg> jodh, not much we can do until its a bit more repeatable
[15:54] <jodh> rtg: ack.
[16:11] <jsalisbury> infinity, do you happen to know who could look at this .deb to get it renamed?  bug 1172065
[16:11] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1172065 in linux (Ubuntu) "12.04.2 incorrect file name signed efi amd6.deb" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1172065
[16:16] <infinity> jsalisbury: Have you verified this?
[16:17] <jsalisbury> infinity, not yet
[16:17] <infinity> jsalisbury: Colin's looking now. :P
[16:17] <jsalisbury> infinity, cool, thanks
[17:11]  * ppisati -> EOD
[17:17] <Bhavesh__> hello.....I would like to know that what is the system call number for listen and bind in Ubuntu 32bit kernel?
[17:19] <Bhavesh__> can anybody help in system call?
[17:29]  * rtg -> lunch
[17:42]  * henrix -> EOD
[19:59] <rtg> bjf, I'm confused about 'fbcon: fix locking harder' for Quantal. From the bug reports it seems all of the feedback was using 3.2 (Precise)
[20:01] <bjf> rtg, yes, the subject line was wrong and was for Precise and not Quantal
[20:01] <bjf> rtg, the Quantal change went in yesterday
[20:02] <bjf> rtg, it was a different bug #
[20:02] <rtg> bjf, ah, I'm dyslexic
[20:02] <bjf> rtg, i didn't help
[20:03]  * rtg -> EOD