=== chuck_ is now known as zul [02:29] Where are the "boot=" and "iso-scan/filename=" kernel boot options documented? === BruceMa is now known as BruceMa_afk === smb` is now known as smb [08:55] henrix, what's the timescale for this to reach regression testing again: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1172023? [08:55] Launchpad bug 1172023 in Kernel SRU Workflow verification-testing "linux: 3.5.0-28.48 -proposed tracker" [Medium,In progress] [08:56] henrix, also, is precise definitely not being respun? https://bugs.launchpad.net/kernel-sru-workflow/+bug/1167436 [08:56] Launchpad bug 1167436 in Kernel SRU Workflow certification-testing "linux: 3.2.0-41.65 -proposed tracker" [Medium,In progress] [09:15] diwic, hey ... can you shove some 'short paragraph' for your release note, into the bug description section please [09:15] bug #1169984 [09:15] Launchpad bug 1169984 in Release Notes for Ubuntu "Either oops or opening device fails with -ENODEV, with HDMI audio" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1169984 [09:15] apw, ack [09:18] apw, have a look and see if you think it's reasonable [09:27] diwic, i'll get that in shortly, thanks [09:45] diwic, great, i have applied word smithing to it and shoved it in the release notes, but that was good [09:52] apw, ack, thanks [09:52] apw, didn't know if you should mention the oops and the -enodev stuff but it seemed to technical for end-user release notes [11:16] diwic, yeah not too techy in there, point at the bug for those who care === e11bits_ is now known as e11bits [12:24] apw, https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2013-April/027860.html [13:08] brendand, did you test that kernel ? [13:08] bjf, yes. it worked. but somehow so did -proposed. voodoo magic [13:15] brendand, bug 1172023 is ready for you now [13:15] Launchpad bug 1172023 in Kernel SRU Workflow "linux: 3.5.0-28.48 -proposed tracker" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1172023 [13:48] cking, apw: rebooting gomeisa for kernel update [13:48] ack [13:49] bjf, - i meant to ask, can our testing that we did already for the 28.47 kernel remain valid? [13:51] bjf, also is precise clear in terms of regressions? there was one being investigated right? [13:51] brendand, that's like saying "we found a possible regression but we don't want to test your fix" [13:52] brendand, precise had the same issues as quantal and has been respun [13:52] brendand, bug 1172464 [13:52] Launchpad bug 1172464 in Kernel SRU Workflow "linux: 3.2.0-41.66 -proposed tracker" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1172464 [13:53] brendand, as far as bug 1172023, you do what you think is best [13:53] Launchpad bug 1172023 in Kernel SRU Workflow "linux: 3.5.0-28.48 -proposed tracker" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1172023 [13:53] bjf, that's not what i'm saying - i'm asking for your recommendation [13:53] bjf, given what you know about the delta between 28.48 and 28.47 [13:54] brendand, it's two patches. one fixes a sandybridge gpu hang. the other deals with locking in th fb driver and can show up in plymouth during boot [13:55] brendand, my recomendation would be that yes, you retest [13:55] bjf, ok - then we need an extension [13:56] brendand, i'm ok with that ... anytime we have a regression and spin a new kernel we assume we may not meet the 3 week schedule [13:56] brendand, we don't expect people to work miracles [14:04] chiluk, rebooting tangerine for kernel update [14:07] thanks. [14:20] anybody seeing bluetooth not working on thinkpads? i'm on a T420, doesn't even show up on rfkill list [14:33] brendand, bug 1172464 is ready for you and my guidance is the same there. i'm aware that you will not be able to get this all tested this week. thanks. [14:33] Launchpad bug 1172464 in Kernel SRU Workflow "linux: 3.2.0-41.66 -proposed tracker" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1172464 [14:38] hmm, could be the wrong day to run phablet-flash [15:13] * rtg opens ubuntu-saucy repo [15:16] dont put to much sauce in :P [15:24] rsalveti: where does the source for the phablet kernel live? We've been looking at ubuntu-nexus7.git trying to pull apart bug 1167415, but that's apparently not whats on the nexus. [15:24] Launchpad bug 1167415 in touch-preview-images "android kernel ignores /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1167415 [15:25] ev, http://phablet.ubuntu.com/gitweb?p=CyanogenMod/android_kernel_asus_grouper.git;a=summary [15:25] thanks rtg [15:26] ev, we're still working on getting an Ubuntu'ized kernel on the N7 [15:26] rtg: yeah, apw was saying [15:27] I'll be popping in next week to see how that's going and see if it solves our core dump issue [15:28] ev: we're still using from this tree, but later we'll be switching to the one from ubuntu [16:01] ogasawara, we can delete the ubuntu-raring-lbm.git repo, yes ? [16:08] rtg: yep, there's nothing in there [16:08] ogasawara, its gone [16:54] ogasawara: hi! is https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/Dev/ABIPackages up to date? [16:54] glp [16:57] ogasawara: is there no linux-backports-modules package for raring? [16:57] jdstrand, there is not [16:57] only for precise [16:58] rtg: well, quantal has one, but that's fine. thanks :) [16:58] jdstrand, that was an oversight :) [16:58] heh [16:58] rtg: so, does https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/Dev/ABIPackages look up to date to you? [16:58] jdstrand, checking [16:58] rtg: (for raring) [16:59] jdstrand, it doesn't have the nexus kernels, but then I'm not sure it needs to. [17:00] ok, I'll wait on ogasawara [17:00] linux-ti-omap4 seems to exist for raring as well, but it isn't listed [17:00] jdstrand, infinity is pocket copying ti-omap4 from Quantal [17:01] I see, ok, thanks [17:11] jdstrand: it is up to date and quite lean. indeed there is no lbm and we agreed to pocket copy ti-omap4 from quantal but it's not getting any official security support or bug fixing in Raring [17:12] jdstrand: I didn't throw the phablet kernels there either as it's my understanding we're not officially supporting those either [17:12] jdstrand: not from a security point of view anyways [17:12] ogasawara: ok, that's cool. I like how lean it is :) [17:12] ogasawara: thanks :) [17:29] * rtg -> lunch [17:49] bjf: what is the rt email id? :) [17:49] hello [17:49] we know about 3.8.0-19 broken audio? [17:49] http://www.alsa-project.org/db/?f=2bac91e547bf6fa7a763e0059593731208fc8a25 [18:06] -19 and -18 [18:07] amitk, rt@admin.canonical.com ? [18:07] rtg: found it, thanks [18:12] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1172830 [18:12] Launchpad bug 1172830 in linux (Ubuntu) "3.8.0-18 and 3.8.0-19 hasn't audio" [Undecided,New] [18:14] Hello. [18:14] I've run into a soft lockup with precise, amd64: http://pastie.org/private/yjhhnettm9yrlr9uqgqntq === Edgan_ is now known as Edgan === kamal is now known as Guest67034 [19:51] bryce, can you create an S-series LTS Backport PPA ? [20:05] rtg: done [20:05] sorry about that, thought mlankhorst did it earlier [20:05] Sarvatt, thanks [20:24] * rtg -> EOD [20:41] i saw it was reported yesterday that non-LTS releases will only be supported for 9 mths now. I interpret that to mean that USN updates for kernels will stop 9 mths after release? Can anyone confirm this? [21:01] joshhunt, yes, that is correct [21:03] bjf: ok thanks === stgraber_ is now known as stgraber === dduffey_afk is now known as dduffey === lilstevie_ is now known as lilstevie