[02:29] <kingsley> Where are the "boot=" and "iso-scan/filename=" kernel boot options documented?
[08:55] <brendand> henrix, what's the timescale for this to reach regression testing again: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1172023?
[08:55] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1172023 in Kernel SRU Workflow verification-testing "linux: 3.5.0-28.48 -proposed tracker" [Medium,In progress]
[08:56] <brendand> henrix, also, is precise definitely not being respun? https://bugs.launchpad.net/kernel-sru-workflow/+bug/1167436
[08:56] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1167436 in Kernel SRU Workflow certification-testing "linux: 3.2.0-41.65 -proposed tracker" [Medium,In progress]
[09:15] <apw> diwic, hey ... can you shove some 'short paragraph' for your release note, into the bug description section please
[09:15] <apw> bug #1169984
[09:15] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1169984 in Release Notes for Ubuntu "Either oops or opening device fails with -ENODEV, with HDMI audio" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1169984
[09:15] <diwic> apw, ack
[09:18] <diwic> apw, have a look and see if you think it's reasonable
[09:27] <apw> diwic, i'll get that in shortly, thanks
[09:45] <apw> diwic, great, i have applied word smithing to it and shoved it in the release notes, but that was good
[09:52] <diwic> apw, ack, thanks
[09:52] <diwic> apw, didn't know if you should mention the oops and the -enodev stuff but it seemed to technical for end-user release notes
[11:16] <apw> diwic, yeah not too techy in there, point at the bug for those who care
[12:24] <rtg> apw, https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2013-April/027860.html
[13:08] <bjf> brendand, did you test that kernel ?
[13:08] <brendand> bjf, yes. it worked. but somehow so did -proposed. voodoo magic
[13:15] <bjf> brendand, bug 1172023 is ready for you now
[13:15] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1172023 in Kernel SRU Workflow "linux: 3.5.0-28.48 -proposed tracker" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1172023
[13:48] <rtg> cking, apw: rebooting gomeisa for kernel update
[13:48] <cking> ack
[13:49] <brendand> bjf, - i meant to ask, can our testing that we did already for the 28.47 kernel remain valid?
[13:51] <brendand> bjf, also is precise clear in terms of regressions? there was one being investigated right?
[13:51] <bjf> brendand, that's like saying "we found a possible regression but we don't want to test your fix"
[13:52] <bjf> brendand, precise had the same issues as quantal and has been respun
[13:52] <bjf> brendand, bug 1172464
[13:52] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1172464 in Kernel SRU Workflow "linux: 3.2.0-41.66 -proposed tracker" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1172464
[13:53] <bjf> brendand, as far as bug 1172023, you do what you think is best
[13:53] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1172023 in Kernel SRU Workflow "linux: 3.5.0-28.48 -proposed tracker" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1172023
[13:53] <brendand> bjf, that's not what i'm saying - i'm asking for your recommendation
[13:53] <brendand> bjf, given what you know about the delta between 28.48 and 28.47
[13:54] <bjf> brendand, it's two patches. one fixes a sandybridge gpu hang. the other deals with locking in th fb driver and can show up in plymouth during boot
[13:55] <bjf> brendand, my recomendation would be that yes, you retest
[13:55] <brendand> bjf, ok - then we need an extension
[13:56] <bjf> brendand, i'm ok with that ... anytime we have a regression and spin a new kernel we assume we may not meet the 3 week schedule
[13:56] <bjf> brendand, we don't expect people to work miracles
[14:04] <rtg> chiluk, rebooting tangerine for kernel update
[14:07] <chiluk> thanks.
[14:20] <arges> anybody seeing bluetooth not working on thinkpads? i'm on a T420, doesn't even show up on rfkill list
[14:33] <bjf> brendand, bug 1172464 is ready for you and my guidance is the same there. i'm aware that you will not be able to get this all tested this week. thanks.
[14:33] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1172464 in Kernel SRU Workflow "linux: 3.2.0-41.66 -proposed tracker" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1172464
[14:38] <rtg> hmm, could be the wrong day to run phablet-flash
[15:13]  * rtg opens ubuntu-saucy repo
[15:16] <ogra_> dont put to much sauce in :P
[15:24] <ev> rsalveti: where does the source for the phablet kernel live? We've been looking at ubuntu-nexus7.git trying to pull apart bug 1167415, but that's apparently not whats on the nexus.
[15:24] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1167415 in touch-preview-images "android kernel ignores /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1167415
[15:25] <rtg> ev, http://phablet.ubuntu.com/gitweb?p=CyanogenMod/android_kernel_asus_grouper.git;a=summary
[15:25] <ev> thanks rtg 
[15:26] <rtg> ev, we're still working on getting an Ubuntu'ized kernel on the N7
[15:26] <ev> rtg: yeah, apw was saying
[15:27] <ev> I'll be popping in next week to see how that's going and see if it solves our core dump issue
[15:28] <rsalveti> ev: we're still using from this tree, but later we'll be switching to the one from ubuntu
[16:01] <rtg> ogasawara, we can delete the ubuntu-raring-lbm.git repo, yes ?
[16:08] <ogasawara> rtg: yep, there's nothing in there
[16:08] <rtg> ogasawara, its gone
[16:54] <jdstrand> ogasawara: hi! is https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/Dev/ABIPackages up to date?
[16:54] <rtg> glp
[16:57] <jdstrand> ogasawara: is there no linux-backports-modules package for raring?
[16:57] <rtg> jdstrand, there is not
[16:57] <rtg> only for precise
[16:58] <jdstrand> rtg: well, quantal has one, but that's fine. thanks :)
[16:58] <rtg> jdstrand, that was an oversight :)
[16:58] <jdstrand> heh
[16:58] <jdstrand> rtg: so, does https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/Dev/ABIPackages look up to date to you?
[16:58] <rtg> jdstrand, checking
[16:58] <jdstrand> rtg: (for raring)
[16:59] <rtg> jdstrand, it doesn't have the nexus kernels, but then I'm not sure it needs to.
[17:00] <jdstrand> ok, I'll wait on ogasawara 
[17:00] <jdstrand> linux-ti-omap4 seems to exist for raring as well, but it isn't listed
[17:00] <rtg> jdstrand, infinity is pocket copying ti-omap4 from Quantal
[17:01] <jdstrand> I see, ok, thanks
[17:11] <ogasawara> jdstrand: it is up to date and quite lean.  indeed there is no lbm and we agreed to pocket copy ti-omap4 from quantal but it's not getting any official security support or bug fixing in Raring
[17:12] <ogasawara> jdstrand: I didn't throw the phablet kernels there either as it's my understanding we're not officially supporting those either
[17:12] <ogasawara> jdstrand: not from a security point of view anyways
[17:12] <jdstrand> ogasawara: ok, that's cool. I like how lean it is :)
[17:12] <jdstrand> ogasawara: thanks :)
[17:29]  * rtg -> lunch
[17:49] <amitk> bjf: what is the rt email id? :)
[17:49] <wmp> hello
[17:49] <wmp> we know about 3.8.0-19 broken audio?
[17:49] <wmp> http://www.alsa-project.org/db/?f=2bac91e547bf6fa7a763e0059593731208fc8a25
[18:06] <wmp> -19 and -18
[18:07] <rtg> amitk, rt@admin.canonical.com ?
[18:07] <amitk> rtg: found it, thanks
[18:12] <wmp> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1172830 
[18:12] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1172830 in linux (Ubuntu) "3.8.0-18 and 3.8.0-19 hasn't audio" [Undecided,New]
[18:14] <backjlack> Hello.
[18:14] <backjlack> I've run into a soft lockup with precise, amd64: http://pastie.org/private/yjhhnettm9yrlr9uqgqntq
[19:51] <rtg> bryce, can you create an S-series LTS Backport PPA ?
[20:05] <Sarvatt> rtg: done
[20:05] <Sarvatt> sorry about that, thought mlankhorst did it earlier
[20:05] <rtg> Sarvatt, thanks
[20:24]  * rtg -> EOD
[20:41] <joshhunt> i saw it was reported yesterday that non-LTS releases will only be supported for 9 mths now. I interpret that to mean that USN updates for kernels will stop 9 mths after release? Can anyone confirm this?
[21:01] <bjf> joshhunt, yes, that is correct
[21:03] <joshhunt> bjf: ok thanks