=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk
=== hggdh_ is now known as hggdh
=== drr is now known as bg
=== drr is now known as bg
[09:03] <debfx> why doesn't lintian build-depends on libtest-perl-critic-perl show up on component-mismatches?
[09:11] <apachelogger> cjwatson: btw, I was talking about the wrong file... grub-pc.config is the one causing trouble
[09:18] <apachelogger> cjwatson: so, I am wondering what the right solution is. only write to debconf db if at least default/grub is present or actually check if the variables were defined before writing them? seems to me latter is what should be happening
=== shadeslayer is now known as kubot1
=== kubot1 is now known as shadeslayer
[12:38] <tkamppeter> Anyone of the SRU team here? bdmurray, RAOF_, infinity, SpamapS, slangasek, ScottK?
=== smartboyhw_ is now known as smartboyhw
[14:49] <slangasek> tkamppeter: "here" but with limited availability this week; what's up?
=== mmrazik is now known as mmrazik|afk
[15:19] <tkamppeter> slangasek, I have uploaded a CUPS SRU for bugpopd
[15:21] <tkamppeter> slangasek, I have uploaded a CUPS SRU for bug 1108719 and now I need to add also the SRU for bug 1133794 to the upload. Can you reject the current upload so that I can do a new upload with both SRUs? Thanks.
[15:21] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1108719 in cups (Ubuntu Raring) "usb crashed with SIGSEGV in opendir() -- USB ports are in BIOS disabled --> cupsd crashes every time" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1108719
[15:21] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1133794 in lubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) "Printer not detected by system-config-printer 1.3.11 in Lubuntu 13.04" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1133794
[15:22] <slangasek> tkamppeter: done
[15:24] <tkamppeter> slangasek, thanks, new package uploaded.
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha
=== seb128_ is now known as seb128
[18:38] <cjwatson> apachelogger: I don't have a complete right answer and probably won't be able to sort it out this week, but I'd like to look at it in detail when I'm not at a sprint.  Is there a bug for all this?
[19:16] <apachelogger> cjwatson: I'll file one
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk
[21:06] <Noskcaj> the upgrade testcases haven't update for 6 days
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha
[21:06] <phillw> Noskcaj: why should they? they are test cases, not ISO's
[21:07] <Noskcaj> phillw, aren't they meant to reset with every iso build?
[21:07] <phillw> Noskcaj: only if we re-write them :)
[21:07] <Noskcaj> oh, never mind then
[21:07] <cjwatson> Noskcaj: the description of those test cases says they're updated weekly
[21:08] <cjwatson> e.g. http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/270/builds/43090/testcases
[21:08] <Noskcaj> ok, ty
[21:09] <phillw> cjwatson: just while you are here, is lubuntu cron job the same time for saucy as raring?
[21:10] <phillw> 16:29 (UTC) and  01:35 (UTC) for ac100
[21:10] <cjwatson> No change.  You can look this up yourself in lp:ubuntu-cdimage etc/crontab
[21:11] <phillw> cjwatson: thanks, I'm just 'waking' up our testing page from its brief holiday :)
[21:23] <phillw> cjwatson: I can't find lp:ubuntu-cdimage etc/crontab ?
[21:26] <stgraber> phillw: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/ubuntu-cdimage/mainline/view/head:/etc/crontab
[21:27] <phillw> thanks stgraber :)