=== mbarnett` is now known as mbarnett === izdubar is now known as MarkDude [06:48] slangasek: what package is submitbug in? [16:23] bkerensa: you mean 'submittodebian' or 'reportbug'? [18:33] bkerensa: pingy [18:42] slangasek: submittodebian [18:42] MarkDude: ? [18:44] * MarkDude wants to know if your BP is scheduled for UDS [18:45] * MarkDude does NOT want to interfere with your process [18:45] Whilst still reserving right to try my strategy with linking Bug#1 as well as formation language of Ub untu [18:46] If your effort does not succeed in restoring Community to header [18:46] The *if* is key there [18:47] MarkDude: Yes it is http://summit.ubuntu.com/uds-1305/meeting/21740/community-1305-ubuntu-website-planning/ [18:47] * MarkDude was advised to ping Jono , but- Im not sure that makes sense if your BP is moving along [18:47] Cool. No need for me to make extra noise [18:47] "If your effort does not succeed in restoring Community to header" [18:47] yep [18:48] Canonical has already stated they do not plan to re-add it to the header [18:48] so I do not believe it will be [18:48] Yep, heard that also [18:48] They said they will add it some other place [18:48] * MarkDude needs to be fair [18:48] allow the process to go [18:48] they said removing the community link from the top was a business decision [18:48] Then go with my process [18:48] and that they do not need to consult the community on every little thing affecting the community [18:48] Cool, and thats an albatross that will hang around their neck [18:49] * bkerensa shrugs [18:49] im over it [18:49] ;) [18:49] Albatross. [18:49] * MarkDude has proven track record of pushing for the Community. Not gonna stop now [18:49] * MarkDude will pause to let your session do it's thing. Not doing so would be rude on my part :) [18:50] And Canonical is in a position to be judged by its actions [18:50] Which is occurring at same time Fedora is pondering how to define itself [18:51] It was a stalemate. Now there is an easy- we are not that. Community link will always be there. [18:52] * MarkDude would rather win his 1 US Dollar bet tho. than to have this turn into mktg crap. [18:53] * MarkDude did want to call his BP "dont piss on my leg, AND tell me it's rain". [18:54] wanna bet 1 US Dollar the Community link is restored by mid-Summer? [18:54] eof. [18:54] :) [20:12] bkerensa: ubuntu-dev-tools [20:12] slangasek: thx [21:14] slangasek: http://i.imgur.com/4HRszJ2.png :( submittodebian hates me [21:14] always exploding ubuntu changes into patches [21:23] bkerensa: why does the screenshot claim the package version is 3.0-a9-1 instead of having an Ubuntu package version number? [21:24] (this may be the root of the problem) [21:27] slangasek: because I bzr branch debianlp:lmbench [21:27] so it should not have deb version [21:28] then I made my change to debian/control [21:28] and submittodebian [21:28] and explosion of deltas resulted [21:28] bkerensa: submittodebian is intended for submitting Ubuntu changes to Debian; an Ubuntu upload would have an Ubuntu changelog entry in debian/changelog [21:28] :( [21:29] slangasek: so is there no tool for grabbing debian source packages and making changes and then submitting patches on debian without ubuntu changes being in the equation? [21:29] Ubuntu is not going to accept these changes because we dont want to carry them [21:30] sure there is; 'bzr diff -p1 > patch'; 'reportbug' and attach the patch [21:31] slangasek: you are a genius that or I just fail [21:31] slangasek: does reportbug use the debian smtp server like submittodebian or do I have to setup some local smtp? [21:32] submittodebian is a wrapper around reportbug ;) [21:32] ah [21:32] I think you have to invoke it as 'reportbug -B debian' [21:32] hmms [21:32] I need to jot all this down so I dont forget it and bug you next cycle about it [21:32] ;)