[12:13] <nicferrier> looking for some bzr help please! I've done bzr branch location local-branch-name twice, with 2 upstream branches... but bzr branches still just shows me "*" as the sum total of branches. am I doing something wrong?
[12:13] <nicferrier> (I'm guessing "yes")
[12:50] <LarstiQ> nicferrier: recent bzr will look at colocated branches for `bzr branches` iirc
[12:50] <LarstiQ> nicferrier: what do you want `bzr branches` to do?
[12:51] <LarstiQ> nicferrier: if you're not using colocation, then `ls` might be fine
[12:51] <nicferrier> LarstiQ: thanks. I was being stupid. I was expecting co-located branches. never mind me :-)
[12:51] <LarstiQ> nicferrier: right, so I guess the two branches you made were not colocated?
[12:52] <nicferrier> LarstiQ: right.
[12:53]  * LarstiQ wonders how to branch into colocation
[13:17] <jelmer> LarstiQ: the only real way at the moment is "bzr branch URL co:local"
[15:34] <LarstiQ> jelmer: the co: is not working here for some reason
[15:35] <jelmer> LarstiQ: what version of bzr are you running?
[15:35] <jelmer> I think it only works with 2.6
[15:35] <LarstiQ> jelmer: bzr.dev
[15:43] <jelmer> LarstiQ: hmm, not sure what's happening in that case. There is a branch in your current directory?
[15:46] <LarstiQ> jelmer: I'll have to dig into the reason for the directory lookup not working, but not now
[15:46] <LarstiQ> jelmer: fwiw, the error is  'bzr: ERROR: Unsupported protocol for url "co:apart"'
[15:47] <jelmer> LarstiQ: are you sure that's bzr.dev?
[15:48] <LarstiQ> jelmer: `~/src/bzr/bzr.dev/bzr branch ~/src/bzr/bzr.dev co:apart`
[15:48] <LarstiQ> jelmer: fairly sure
[15:48] <LarstiQ> ah
[15:48] <LarstiQ> but maybe bzr.dev has a colo branch?
[15:49] <LarstiQ> nope, that's not it
[15:49] <jelmer> LarstiQ: that shouldn't matter - it would only copy the active branch anyway
[15:49] <LarstiQ> jelmer: no I mean, the bzr I'm using might be on old branch
[15:49] <jelmer> LarstiQ: I wonder if perhaps we don't do directory lookups for the second argument to zr branch'
[15:49] <LarstiQ> but I just pulled from lp:bzr
[15:49] <jelmer> LarstiQ: either way, this stuff is unfinished :-(
[15:50]  * LarstiQ nods