=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha
=== tasdomas is now known as tasdomas_afk
=== tasdomas_afk is now known as tasdomas
=== tasdomas is now known as tasdomas_afk
=== hggdh_ is now known as hggdh
[02:52] <ScottK> TheLordOfTime: Unless they're paying you, you can (and should) tell them to buzz off.
[05:46] <stub> StevenK: Didn't I review this yesterday?
[05:47] <StevenK> stub: Yes. There was some unpleasantness with pipes.
[05:47] <wgrant> And the column name has changed, hasn't it?
[05:48] <StevenK> I don't think that has been pushed
[05:51] <StevenK> It's pushing now
=== bigjools_ is now known as bigjools
=== tasdomas_afk is now known as tasdomas
=== jamesh_ is now known as jamesh
=== broder_ is now known as broder
=== tasdomas is now known as tasdomas_afk
[08:57] <apw> wgrant, StevenK, I am right in thinking that PPU rights (via a package set) should bring nomination rights for the full list of included packages
=== tsimpson_ is now known as tsimpson
=== cyphermox_ is now known as cyphermox
=== tasdomas_afk is now known as tasdomas
=== tasdomas is now known as tasdomas_afk
=== tasdomas_afk is now known as tasdomas
[16:53] <bjf> i have PPU rights for linux-* (kernels) and can accept nominations for relevant bugs/tasks. however, i don't seem to be able to accept nominations for linux-lowlatency or linux-armadaxp and I can't figure out how to make LP tell me why that is
=== jtaylor_ is now known as jtaylor
=== tasdomas is now known as tasdomas_afk
=== tasdomas_afk is now known as tasdomas
[18:36] <Delemas> Any idea why dget in Ubuntu raring is reporting launchpad.net's SSL cert as untrusted?
[18:57] <Delemas> Never mind. Turned out all was needed was a c_rehash...
=== wedgwoodz is now known as wedgwood_away
=== tasdomas is now known as tasdomas_afk
=== wedgwood_away is now known as wedgwood
=== tasdomas_afk is now known as tasdomas
=== tasdomas is now known as tasdomas_afk
[21:48] <ScottK> micahg: ^^^ can you answer bjf's question.
[22:14] <bjf> StevenK, or wgrant can you help me with my question? ^^
[22:15] <bjf> Ursinha, can you help me? ^^
[22:16] <bjf> Ursinha, sorry, just realized your long gone for today.
[22:22] <wgrant> bjf: Do you have an example of a nomination that you can't approve?
[22:22] <bjf> wgrant, looking
[22:23] <bjf> wgrant bug 1177492
[22:23] <ubot5> bug 1177492 in Kernel SRU Workflow "linux-lowlatency: <version to be filled> -proposed tracker" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1177492
[22:25] <stgraber> bjf: linux-lowlatency doesn't exist in precise
[22:26] <stgraber> so it's not in your packageset which means you're not an uploader which IIRC means that LP won't let you accept nomination unless you're in the driver team
[22:27] <bjf> stgraber, ok, maybe that's a bad example (you are correct about it not in precise).. let me look for another
[22:29] <wgrant> There was a bug that prevented packageset (not PPU) privs from working on bugs, but that was fixed long ago.
[22:31] <bjf> stgraber, wgrant ok, ignore me for now (i can't find a good example right now).
[22:31] <stgraber> bjf: if you do, ping me, it's likely because the packagesets aren't in sync (they can't really be), so I need to manually add the new source and then it should work for you
[22:31] <bjf> stgraber, wgrant you've made me question what I was seeing (which is not a bad thing).
[22:32] <bjf> stgraber, ack, thanks
=== wedgwood is now known as wedgwood_away