[09:30] <ogra_> slangasek, reading your blog  it just struck me that we should probably have an "avoid fsck interaction" session at UDS ...  (or if we really want user interaction at that stage on a phone "touch ways to interact with plymouth")
[10:00] <ogra_> cjwatson, i'm kind of stuck with the ubuntu-touch publication ...  /srv/cdimage.ubuntu.com/scratch/ubuntu-touch/saucy/daily-preinstalled/debian-cd/armhf/ seems to have the right files and i think i got ubuntu-touch added everywhere needed
[10:00] <ogra_> but i still get a "no image found" in /srv/cdimage.ubuntu.com/log/ubuntu-touch/saucy/daily-preinstalled-20130508.log
[10:01] <ogra_> oh, and the www/ output dir is created
[10:51] <ogra_> ah, think i found the issue
[10:52]  * ogra_ tries a test build
[10:57] <cjwatson> ogra_: Looks plausible, but please keep tests passing
[10:57] <cjwatson> ogra_: (Remember to install pep8 as well)
[10:57] <ogra_> will do
[11:09] <ogra_> pep8 issue fixed
[11:09]  * ogra_ hugs vim for having such nice plugins
[12:04] <ogra_> phew, finally  publishing
[12:05] <ogra_> now there still seems to be some isotracker stuff missing
[12:05] <ogra_> and indieed the actual format will be zip in the end
[12:05] <cjwatson> does that mean you have time to fix the other tests that are still failing? :)
[12:05] <cjwatson> ./run-tests  before committing
[12:05] <ogra_> other tests ?
[12:05] <cjwatson> you must not have run the full test suite
[12:05] <ogra_> oh
[12:29] <ogra_> cjwatson, could it be that the ubuntu-touch-preview test failed before already ?
[12:35] <cjwatson> ogra_: no; 'bzr revert -r1263; ./run-tests' passes
[12:35] <ogra_> hmm, ok
[12:35] <ogra_> i have all ubuntu-touch targets fixed locally, but ubuntu-touch-preview still complains
[12:36] <cjwatson> None of the current failures seem to mention "ubuntu-touch-preview"
[12:37] <cjwatson> Ah
[12:37] <cjwatson> -                    publish_type == "preinstalled"):
[12:37] <cjwatson> +                    publish_type == "preinstalled-touch"):
[12:37] <ogra_> http://paste.ubuntu.com/5644483/
[12:37] <cjwatson> Maybe you need to split that elif block again, given that you've made them have different publish_types again
[12:38] <cjwatson> (Which wasn't the case when I consolidated that into a single elif block)
[12:38] <cjwatson> This is in lib/cdimage/tree.py around line 2140
[12:38] <ogra_> ah, k
[12:40] <ogra_> the preview ones will go away anyway as soon as we can build the android bits ourselves
[12:40] <cjwatson> Sure, but I don't believe in breaking code before its time :)
[12:42] <ogra_> heh, nah, fixing
[12:56] <ogra_> ok, all fixed it seems
[13:56] <mlankhorst> cjwatson: ooh can you accept the lts-raring stack to precise-proposed? :>
[13:58] <jpds> mlankhorst: New kernel?
[13:58] <mlankhorst> nah the xserver stack
[14:23] <mlankhorst> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+queue?queue_state=0&queue_text= :>
[14:35] <slangasek> ogra_: by all means, please register a session for it
[14:36] <ogra_> heh, i wonder why nobody thoight of it before :)
[14:48] <Riddell> I think it would be useful to have sessions reviewing lts backports and uefi for kubuntu at vUDS, who would be good to invite for those?
[14:51] <slangasek> Riddell: probably cjwatson
[14:51] <slangasek> (I would include myself, but I'm on vacation next week so unlikely to make it)
[14:52] <cjwatson> yep, feel free to invite me; perhaps somebody like mlankhorst too
[14:52] <Riddell> thanks
[16:47] <mlankhorst> Riddell: I'm not sure what you want from the reviewing lts backports though, they should just work :/
[17:03] <infinity> mlankhorst: I suspect he wants to review what needs to be done to make Kubuntu leverage said backports for 12.04.3, since he missed the boat at the last point release.
[23:51] <rtg_> infinity, please allow me to inflict linux-manta and linux-meta-manta on the rest of the world. they are currently stuck in NEW.
[23:53] <infinity> rtg_: Maybe the world isn't ready for this pain?
[23:53] <infinity> rtg_: (I'll look at 'em in a sec)
[23:54] <rtg_> infinity, thanks. in reality, I'm the only one that'll feel the pain until I let the touch folks know that they have an archive kernel to use.
[23:56] <infinity> rtg_: Is this one dangerously close to one of the other kernels, so I can cheat and look at a vaguely minimal diff?
[23:57] <rtg_> infinity, yeah, its either grouper or mako. lemme look
[23:57] <infinity> rtg_: The one that's also 3.4, I assume. :P
[23:57] <rtg_> yes
[23:57] <infinity> mako it is.
[23:58] <infinity> Thanks, I'll poke this shortly.
[23:59] <rtg_> infinity, confirmed. mako is the other 3.4 based kernel.
[23:59] <infinity> mako messes with my fingers.  I'm incapable of typing it without typing "make^Ho"