[00:00] <cjwatson> bdmurray: Yes - you might want to specify an explicit version for safety
[00:00] <cjwatson> Er, but wasn't that successfully validated?
[00:01] <bdmurray> cjwatson: no, the bug has the details
[00:01] <cjwatson> I couldn't work it out from the bug :)
[00:01] <cjwatson> But then it's 1am and I should be packing ...
[00:01] <bdmurray> well the verification of the latest package version was successful for raring
[00:01] <cjwatson> Anyway, remove-package is strictly more like remove-publication
[00:31] <infinity> bdmurray: There was/is no reason to remove it if you were replacing it with a new version anyway.
[00:31] <infinity> bdmurray: There can't be more than one publication for the same source in a pocket, after all.
[00:48] <bdmurray> infinity: Thanks, I came to that conclusion myself
[00:49] <infinity> bdmurray: Kay. ;)
[11:53] <ogra_> can someone force the latest ubuntu-touch-meta throough britney please (it uses PPAs and britney cant auto-migrate it frrom proposed to the archive)
[12:39] <ogra_> thanks !
[13:36] <bladernr`> Morning all, just a quick question... can anyone tell me how long Hardy will stay in the Archives until it's cleared out? I've got a friend who wants to grab a copy of hte hardy packages for his stuff at home and I wasn't sure if Hardy was deleted from the archives yet or not, nor how long it will be there
[13:40] <stgraber> bladernr`: I'm not sure how long we'll be keeping hardy on archive.u.c, but once it's gone, it'll show up on old-releases.ubuntu.com so you can just grab the packages from there
[13:41] <bladernr`> stgraber: oh, awesome.  Thanks
[13:41] <ogra_> i think it already is on old-releases ... they will live for some time in parallel
[13:42] <ogra_> should be safe to switch
[13:42] <stgraber> ogra_: it's not on http://old-releases.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/
[13:42] <ogra_> the frontpage lists it on http://old.releases.ubuntu.com/
[13:42] <ogra_> oh, only for images
[14:09] <ScottK> infinity: Any objection to waiving the 7 day wait on nginx since it's such a trivial fix for a serious bug?  It's verified now.
[14:11] <stgraber> ScottK: I'm pretty sure I saw infinity suggest doing just that yesterday on IRC
[14:12] <stgraber> 18:39 < TheLordOfTime> infinity:  any way to skip -proposed for Raring on this?
[14:12] <stgraber> 18:39 < TheLordOfTime> (or did you upload directly to -updates)
[14:12] <stgraber> 18:39 < infinity> TheLordOfTime: Skip, no.  But I can expedite the SRU once it's been built and verified.
[14:25] <ScottK> stgraber: Thanks.
[14:28] <ScottK> OK.  Done.