[01:04] <hggdh> TheLordOfTime: I am not aware of a list of packages synced from Debian; the sync process is described here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SyncRequestProcess
[01:04] <TheLordOfTime> hggdh, i wasn't looking for a list i was looking for an article about the autosyncs
[01:05] <hggdh> ah
[01:05] <TheLordOfTime> tbh i could ask in -devel what all's on the autosync
[01:05] <TheLordOfTime> they'd probably know
[01:05] <hggdh> yes
[01:05] <hggdh> but then the link above probably will help
[01:06] <hggdh> and https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Ubuntu/ForDebianDevelopers, which talks (en passant) about why sync, or merge
[01:08] <TheLordOfTime> yeah, the main one on my list is the bug filed against apt
[01:08] <TheLordOfTime> asking for a sync from debian
[01:08] <TheLordOfTime> the other flurry of bugs I haven't checked debian yet
[01:08] <TheLordOfTime> (but i betcha they don't have the latest upstream versions being requested)
[01:14] <hggdh> heh
[08:18] <sicness> Hi! Current  pkg r8168-dkms (8.035.00-1) has issue (kernel module can't be complied for new kernels). It fixed in new version (8.035.00-2) in ppa https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/r8168/+bug/1108068 . What should I  to do for reliase it to current version of ubuntu?
[08:18] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 1108068 in r8168 (Ubuntu) "r8168 fails to install in kernel 3.8.0-1 and 3.8.0-2 [error: expected ‘=’, ‘,’, ‘;’, ‘asm’ or ‘__attribute__’ before ‘rtl8168_init_board’]" [Undecided,Fix released]
[08:24] <Noskcaj> sicness, i assume you need the SRU team
[08:25] <sicness> How can I contact with them?
[08:26] <Noskcaj> hopefully some of them are here. search stable release team on the wiki for more help.
[08:27] <sicness> thx
[14:58] <sicness> In raring I have funny case: lxc is already the newest version.
[14:58] <sicness> $ lxc
[14:58] <sicness> The program 'lxc' is currently not installed. You can install it by typing:
[14:58] <sicness> sudo apt-get install lxc
[15:08] <jtaylor> probably outdated command-not-found data, there is no lxc binary
[15:10] <sicness> But how can I run lxc?
[15:12] <jtaylor> lxc-execute, lxc-start
[19:40] <matthewgall> Any bug supervisors able to take at a SRU candidate?
[20:37] <hggdh> mfisch: OK, Alberto has been accepted. Thank you for pinging me
[21:01] <TheLordOfTime> hggdh:  ping
[21:01] <TheLordOfTime> who do we bother about a user who is CONSTANTLY requesting syncs and merges for everything, while paying no attention to current bugs and stuff
[21:01] <TheLordOfTime> (they read as a possibly-spammy user at the point)
[21:26] <hggdh> TheLordOfTime: pong
[21:26] <TheLordOfTime> hggdh:  ACK
[21:26] <TheLordOfTime> hggdh:  CSRedHat is on my radar of overkill bug spamming
[21:27] <hggdh> TheLordOfTime: syn, ack
[21:27] <TheLordOfTime> namely since they've been filing bug after bug after bug after bug after...
[21:27] <hggdh> I think it is more because s/he is new to the process
[21:27] <TheLordOfTime> ... you get the idea.
[21:27] <TheLordOfTime> theyu're on the QA team you'd think someone'd teach them this
[21:27] <TheLordOfTime> i've already sniped an nginx update bug they filed, because i filed a merge request for it already
[21:27] <hggdh> we can raise it with balloons
[21:27] <TheLordOfTime> indeed.
[21:28] <TheLordOfTime> in the mean time can you give me the link to the whole documentation explaining the dev cycle
[21:28] <TheLordOfTime> and when we autosync from unstable
[21:28] <TheLordOfTime> so i can send them that in an email and reiterate that filing a crapload of bugs is not good form?
[21:32] <hggdh> just a sec
[21:33] <hggdh> TheLordOfTime: one of them (of course) is http://developer.ubuntu.com/resources/platform/documentation/
[21:33] <TheLordOfTime> bah where's the dev lifecycle schedule...
[21:34] <TheLordOfTime> there it is...;
[21:34] <TheLordOfTime> hggdh:  i'm collecting the links, i"m going to poke balloons about this eventually, perhaps suggest an educational course in "The Development Lifecycle" for everyone
[21:35] <hggdh> TheLordOfTime: another https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/KnowledgeBase
[21:35] <hggdh> TheLordOfTime: might be a good one for a developer week
[21:35] <TheLordOfTime> indeed
[21:35] <TheLordOfTime> although it should be mandatory reading for the QA team :p
[21:36] <TheLordOfTime> s/reading/reading or attendance/
[21:36] <TheLordOfTime> also the announcer bot's dead
[21:36] <TheLordOfTime> for -bugs-announce
[21:38] <TheLordOfTime> hggdh:  know when the next developer week is?
[21:43] <hggdh> TheLordOfTime: should be two or three weeks after UDS
[21:53] <juliusvonkohout> anyone out there?
[21:53] <TheLordOfTime> juliusvonkohout:  we're alive
[21:53] <TheLordOfTime> sorta.
[21:53] <juliusvonkohout> ive got a question related to old bugs in general
[21:53] <TheLordOfTime> feel free to ask it.
[21:53] <juliusvonkohout> for example bugs filed against ubuntu releases which are not supported anymore
[21:54] <TheLordOfTime> what's your question.
[21:54] <juliusvonkohout> shall i set them to invalid if noone replied for years?
[21:54] <TheLordOfTime> which bugs?
[21:54] <juliusvonkohout> i think that would clean up launchpad a lot
[21:54] <TheLordOfTime> hggdh:  wouldn't Won'tFix be a better status for those if they're EOL releases?
[21:55] <hggdh> generically, no, a bug does not cease being a bug just because nobody replied to it
[21:55] <TheLordOfTime> ... yeah true, sorry i'm tired today xD
[21:55] <hggdh> a bug on a EOL release can be closed wontfix for the EOL-ed release
[21:55] <TheLordOfTime> a bug doesn't cease to be a bug if there's no reply, but if it still exists in a later release it's still a bug.
[21:56] <TheLordOfTime> although for the specific release in question, let's use Natty as an example, we can Won't Fix that
[21:56] <hggdh> but, if there are other releases affected (and still not EOL-ed), they keep on
[21:56] <TheLordOfTime> (we being bug control)
[21:56] <TheLordOfTime> yep.
[21:56] <TheLordOfTime> ... whoops spam in another channel i run... :/
[21:57] <hggdh> juliusvonkohout: does this help?
[21:58] <juliusvonkohout> yes i think so.
[21:58] <hggdh> cool :-)
[21:58] <TheLordOfTime> ... this reminds me...
[21:58] <TheLordOfTime> note to self: Sift through php5 bugs and see which have already been fixed, then Fix Released them and comment with the changelog...
[21:58]  * hggdh goes grab the coffee, in an insane attempt to keep up
[21:58] <TheLordOfTime> hggdh:  bring me some while you're at it.
[21:58] <TheLordOfTime> :P
[22:00] <hggdh> TheLordOfTime: I will drink this one thinking of you :-)
[22:00] <TheLordOfTime> awesome
[22:00] <hggdh> oh, there's also some spekulatius
[22:00]  * TheLordOfTime brews a triple shot of espresso
[22:01]  * hggdh is now on a quest to bring up *both* self *and* self's sugar levels
[22:04] <thematthewgall> Any bug supervisor here happy to look at an SRU nomination?
[22:04] <TheLordOfTime> thematthewgall:  hm?
[22:04] <thematthewgall> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/whois/+bug/1176924
[22:04] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 1176924 in whois (Ubuntu) "whois does not recognise .pw TLD" [Undecided,Fix released]
[22:05]  * TheLordOfTime defers that to hggdh
[22:08] <hggdh> thematthewgall: I have targeted it for Precise
[22:08] <thematthewgall> Much obliged :)
[22:09] <TheLordOfTime> whee selfdestruct mode activated.
[22:09] <TheLordOfTime> everybody got guested everywhere xD