[01:04] TheLordOfTime: I am not aware of a list of packages synced from Debian; the sync process is described here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SyncRequestProcess [01:04] hggdh, i wasn't looking for a list i was looking for an article about the autosyncs [01:05] ah [01:05] tbh i could ask in -devel what all's on the autosync [01:05] they'd probably know [01:05] yes [01:05] but then the link above probably will help [01:06] and https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Ubuntu/ForDebianDevelopers, which talks (en passant) about why sync, or merge [01:08] yeah, the main one on my list is the bug filed against apt [01:08] asking for a sync from debian [01:08] the other flurry of bugs I haven't checked debian yet [01:08] (but i betcha they don't have the latest upstream versions being requested) [01:14] heh === neunon_ is now known as neunon === nhandler_ is now known as nhandler === mfisch` is now known as mfisch === maxb_ is now known as Guest5273 === Jikai is now known as Jikan === nightwis- is now known as nightwish === G4MBY2 is now known as PaulW2U === nightwish is now known as wrayan [08:18] Hi! Current pkg r8168-dkms (8.035.00-1) has issue (kernel module can't be complied for new kernels). It fixed in new version (8.035.00-2) in ppa https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/r8168/+bug/1108068 . What should I to do for reliase it to current version of ubuntu? [08:18] Launchpad bug 1108068 in r8168 (Ubuntu) "r8168 fails to install in kernel 3.8.0-1 and 3.8.0-2 [error: expected ‘=’, ‘,’, ‘;’, ‘asm’ or ‘__attribute__’ before ‘rtl8168_init_board’]" [Undecided,Fix released] [08:24] sicness, i assume you need the SRU team [08:25] How can I contact with them? [08:26] hopefully some of them are here. search stable release team on the wiki for more help. [08:27] thx === ivoks_ is now known as ivoks === UbuPhillup_ is now known as UbuPhillup [14:58] In raring I have funny case: lxc is already the newest version. [14:58] $ lxc [14:58] The program 'lxc' is currently not installed. You can install it by typing: [14:58] sudo apt-get install lxc [15:08] probably outdated command-not-found data, there is no lxc binary [15:10] But how can I run lxc? [15:12] lxc-execute, lxc-start === neunon_ is now known as neunon === stokachu_ is now known as stokachu === meetingology` is now known as meetingology === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha === yofel is now known as Guest92253 === shadeslayer_ is now known as Guest46636 === Guest46636 is now known as shadeslayer === Guest92253 is now known as yofel_ [19:40] Any bug supervisors able to take at a SRU candidate? === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk === meetingology` is now known as meetingology [20:37] mfisch: OK, Alberto has been accepted. Thank you for pinging me [21:01] hggdh: ping [21:01] who do we bother about a user who is CONSTANTLY requesting syncs and merges for everything, while paying no attention to current bugs and stuff [21:01] (they read as a possibly-spammy user at the point) === negronjl` is now known as negronjl [21:26] TheLordOfTime: pong [21:26] hggdh: ACK [21:26] hggdh: CSRedHat is on my radar of overkill bug spamming [21:27] TheLordOfTime: syn, ack [21:27] namely since they've been filing bug after bug after bug after bug after... [21:27] I think it is more because s/he is new to the process [21:27] ... you get the idea. [21:27] theyu're on the QA team you'd think someone'd teach them this [21:27] i've already sniped an nginx update bug they filed, because i filed a merge request for it already [21:27] we can raise it with balloons [21:27] indeed. [21:28] in the mean time can you give me the link to the whole documentation explaining the dev cycle [21:28] and when we autosync from unstable [21:28] so i can send them that in an email and reiterate that filing a crapload of bugs is not good form? [21:32] just a sec [21:33] TheLordOfTime: one of them (of course) is http://developer.ubuntu.com/resources/platform/documentation/ [21:33] bah where's the dev lifecycle schedule... [21:34] there it is...; [21:34] hggdh: i'm collecting the links, i"m going to poke balloons about this eventually, perhaps suggest an educational course in "The Development Lifecycle" for everyone [21:35] TheLordOfTime: another https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/KnowledgeBase [21:35] TheLordOfTime: might be a good one for a developer week [21:35] indeed [21:35] although it should be mandatory reading for the QA team :p [21:36] s/reading/reading or attendance/ [21:36] also the announcer bot's dead [21:36] for -bugs-announce [21:38] hggdh: know when the next developer week is? [21:43] TheLordOfTime: should be two or three weeks after UDS [21:53] anyone out there? [21:53] juliusvonkohout: we're alive [21:53] sorta. [21:53] ive got a question related to old bugs in general [21:53] feel free to ask it. [21:53] for example bugs filed against ubuntu releases which are not supported anymore [21:54] what's your question. [21:54] shall i set them to invalid if noone replied for years? [21:54] which bugs? [21:54] i think that would clean up launchpad a lot [21:54] hggdh: wouldn't Won'tFix be a better status for those if they're EOL releases? [21:55] generically, no, a bug does not cease being a bug just because nobody replied to it [21:55] ... yeah true, sorry i'm tired today xD [21:55] a bug on a EOL release can be closed wontfix for the EOL-ed release [21:55] a bug doesn't cease to be a bug if there's no reply, but if it still exists in a later release it's still a bug. [21:56] although for the specific release in question, let's use Natty as an example, we can Won't Fix that [21:56] but, if there are other releases affected (and still not EOL-ed), they keep on [21:56] (we being bug control) [21:56] yep. [21:56] ... whoops spam in another channel i run... :/ [21:57] juliusvonkohout: does this help? [21:58] yes i think so. [21:58] cool :-) [21:58] ... this reminds me... [21:58] note to self: Sift through php5 bugs and see which have already been fixed, then Fix Released them and comment with the changelog... [21:58] * hggdh goes grab the coffee, in an insane attempt to keep up [21:58] hggdh: bring me some while you're at it. [21:58] :P [22:00] TheLordOfTime: I will drink this one thinking of you :-) [22:00] awesome [22:00] oh, there's also some spekulatius [22:00] * TheLordOfTime brews a triple shot of espresso [22:01] * hggdh is now on a quest to bring up *both* self *and* self's sugar levels [22:04] Any bug supervisor here happy to look at an SRU nomination? [22:04] thematthewgall: hm? [22:04] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/whois/+bug/1176924 [22:04] Launchpad bug 1176924 in whois (Ubuntu) "whois does not recognise .pw TLD" [Undecided,Fix released] [22:05] * TheLordOfTime defers that to hggdh [22:08] thematthewgall: I have targeted it for Precise === yofel is now known as Guest73575 === wgrant is now known as Guest43647 === jrib is now known as Guest49957 === PaulW2U is now known as Guest86675 [22:08] Much obliged :) [22:09] whee selfdestruct mode activated. [22:09] everybody got guested everywhere xD === Guest86675 is now known as PaulW2U === mchro- is now known as mchro === kees_ is now known as kees === Guest73575 is now known as yofel_ === yofel_ is now known as yofel === cheako is now known as Guest13659 === meetingology` is now known as meetingology === mchro- is now known as mchro === yofel_ is now known as yofel === emma_ is now known as emma === RoyK^ is now known as RoyK