[08:30] <sicness> Hi! Current  pkg r8168-dkms (8.035.00-1) has issue (kernel module can't be complied for new kernels). It fixed in new version (8.035.00-2) in ppa https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/r8168/+bug/1108068 . What should I  to do for reliase it to current version of ubuntu?
[08:30] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 1108068 in r8168 (Ubuntu) "r8168 fails to install in kernel 3.8.0-1 and 3.8.0-2 [error: expected ‘=’, ‘,’, ‘;’, ‘asm’ or ‘__attribute__’ before ‘rtl8168_init_board’]" [Undecided,Fix released]
[08:45] <tumbleweed> sicness: I'm happy to help you in #ubuntu-motu
[08:45] <infinity> Too late.
[08:45] <infinity> I'm uploading a fixed package now. :P
[08:45] <sicness> Thanks a lot! )
[08:45] <infinity> tumbleweed: But if you want to help him fill out the SRU boilerplate inthe bug so I don't have to, that would be awesome.
[08:46] <tumbleweed> infinity: even better :P
[08:46] <infinity> And uploaded.
[08:47] <sicness> It already in repo ? )
[08:47] <infinity> No, in the queue.
[08:48] <sicness> when excpect to be in repo? )
[08:48] <infinity> Actually, on second thought, given that it's a straight backport from sid and saucy, I might self-review this one.
[08:49] <tumbleweed> sicness: it gets reviewed in the upload queue, and then has to be verified in the raring-proposed archive, before it becomes available in raring-updates
[08:50] <infinity> tumbleweed: Just so I'm not completely flaunting my authority, want to give this a second set of eyes?
[08:50] <infinity> tumbleweed: http://paste.ubuntu.com/5653830/
[08:50] <sicness> How long it usually does?
[08:50] <tumbleweed> sicness: so, you should add some information to the bug, describing theverification - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#SRU_Bug_Template
[08:50] <infinity> tumbleweed: (That's a straight copy and paste from sid/saucy)
[08:50] <tumbleweed> sicness: min 7 days
[08:50] <sicness> ok, thx!
[08:51] <tumbleweed> (unless infinity waves that)
[08:51] <infinity> sicness: It usually takes a week once accepted, and review longer.  In this case, I'll probably push it through faster.
[08:51] <infinity> Cause it's hard to regress from "completely broken".
[08:52] <sicness> Where should I add some info to bug? It's not my ppa and bug
[08:53] <tumbleweed> infinity: I can verify that that's the same patch as Debian, but can't say I follow kernel API achenges :)
[08:53] <tumbleweed> anyway, it looks reasonable
[08:55] <infinity> sicness: Are you able to verify it once it's built?
[08:55] <infinity> sicness: If so, we can probably skip the template editing business.  Don't tell anyone.
[08:56] <tumbleweed> :P
[08:56] <sicness> I have this hardware and it's my bug report to debian. I tested this patch on my PC and this deb too.
[08:56] <infinity> sicness: Great.  So you can test the Ubuntu package when it builds as well. ;)
[08:57] <sicness> Of Course, how will I understand when and what I should to test?
[08:58] <sicness> This subject is new for me (I'm newble in this work :)
[08:58] <sicness> But I want to have skills in that )
[08:59] <infinity> Well, the bug has a link to the build in progress.
[08:59] <infinity> Or, I can just link you the deb.
[08:59] <infinity> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/r8168/8.035.00-1ubuntu1/+build/4568493/+files/r8168-dkms_8.035.00-1ubuntu1_all.deb
[08:59] <infinity> Yay for things that take 49 seconds to build.
[09:02] <sicness> "Error! Module version 8.035.00-NAPI for r8168.ko is not newer" How can I delete old module?
[09:03] <infinity> Oh.  You probably can't downgrade dkms modules very successfully.
[09:03] <infinity> You might need to "dpkg -P r8168-dkms" and then "dpkg -i ..." the new deb.
[09:05] <sicness> I installed patched module from souce on this PC, not from deb. And after dpkg -P r8168-dkms have the same error
[09:06] <infinity> Oh, if you installed the module without dkms, you'll need to hunt it down and delete it.
[09:06] <infinity> mofindo r8168 will give you the filename.
[09:06] <infinity> modinfo too...
[09:06] <infinity> My fingers aren't working.
[09:07]  * infinity tries to install it here and sees if it builds.
[09:08] <sicness> I'll be back :) after reinstall network card module )
[09:08] <infinity> Yup, works here.
[09:12] <sicness2> This deb works for me :)
[09:13] <sicness2> What next?
[09:16] <infinity> sicness2: In this case, that's it.  Normally, there would be a lot more paperwork and such, but in this case, a simple patch that takes it from "doesn't work at all" to "works for me", and a reasonably urgent hardware-related issue, I'm going to just release it.
[09:16] <infinity> sicness2: Still, the next time some SRU comes up that isn't this sort of urgency (and most aren't), you should talk to tumbleweed and friends in #ubuntu-motu and learn the Right Way to do things when I'm not cheating. :)
[09:17] <infinity> (Released, should be in raring-updates on mirrors in ~60 minutes or less)
[09:19] <sicness2> infinity: Thanks a lot for help! SRU is very big doc :) I don't have friends in #ubuntu-motu but I'll  get them :)
[09:19] <infinity> sicness2: I meant tumbleweed's friends, not yours. :)
[09:19] <sicness2> oh, ok )
[09:19] <infinity> sicness2: But you'll find most of the people who idle there are fairly friendly.
[09:20]  * infinity ponders a nap.
[09:22] <infinity> Riddell: Oh hai.
[09:23] <infinity> Riddell: Can you make sure that one of you or ScottK shows up to http://summit.ubuntu.com/uds-1305/meeting/21794/semiannual-release-schedule-review/
[09:23] <infinity> ScottK: ^
[09:27] <Riddell> infinity: ack
[09:27]  * infinity needs to remind all the other flavours this weekend too.
[09:28] <infinity> Though, to be fair, I suspect most don't actually need to show, since they probably don't care if we shuffle things a week one way or the other.
[09:28] <infinity> But I know Kubuntu usually cares a bit, due to alignment of upstream goings-on.
[09:29] <sicness2> infinity, what version of the pkg it will be?
[09:34] <infinity> sicness2: It's the one you just installed by hand.
[09:34] <infinity> sicness2: 8.035.00-1ubuntu1
[09:36] <sicness2> infinity, why not 8.035.00-2 ?
[09:36] <infinity> sicness2: Because that version was already built in saucy, and it also had packaging changes.
[09:37] <infinity> sicness2: SRUs should have the minimal changes required to fix the bug, nothing else.
[09:37] <sicness2> infinity, but in debian this pkg is r8168-dkms (8.035.00-2)
[09:38] <infinity> sicness2: Yes.  And it's that version in saucy too.
[09:39] <sicness2> I don't understand this logic :)
[09:39] <infinity> sicness2: Then I suggest you read that SRU wiki page that tumbleweed linked. :)
[09:39] <sicness2> ok, will read more closely :)
[09:40]  * infinity goes to bed.
[10:22] <sicness> it takes same time for refresh repos mirrors? Because in raring-updates after apt-get update still old version but "The following packages have an equal or higher version in -updates "
[10:28] <tumbleweed> sicness: yes
[10:28] <sicness> How long useally? )
[10:29] <tumbleweed> depends on the mirror. most sync 4x a day