=== JanC_test_ is now known as JanC_test
[10:49] <rawtaz> hi!
[10:51] <rawtaz> question: i am writing a conf for a third paty script which in turn starts a daemon. but it doesnt return a PID so i need to make a post-start script that grabs the pid. i can do that, but how should i hand the resolved PID of the final process to upstart so that it can keep track of things? should i e.g. put it in a file (pidfile maybe), and/or should i set a variable in the upstart conf, or something else?
[11:49] <rawtaz> not having very much success with this. i need to tell whatever upstart is which pid the executed process has. how can i do that?
[11:50] <rawtaz> so it tracks the right pid
[13:40] <JanC_test> rawtaz, maybe use start-stop-daemon  (you can't hand over the pid to upstart right now)
[13:41] <SpamapS> rawtaz: There are only two options. Either you make the process not "daemonize" (usually "foreground mode" in the options), or you carefully count the number of times it forks before being a daemon, and use 'expect fork' or 'expect daemon'.
[13:41] <SpamapS> rawtaz: a third option is to run the program in post-start, and in post-stop, you use the pidfile to kill it. THis means upstart does not keep track of the pid and can't do things like respawn.
[13:44] <rawtaz> JanC_test: start-stop-daemon is an ubuntu thing i believe :)
[13:44] <rawtaz> SpamapS: oh, didnt know about foreground mode, gonna check it out
[13:44] <rawtaz> SpamapS: yeah, but for some impossible-to-understand reason there's only two levels of forking supported. to me thats a big wtf but i guess it's the way it is
[13:45] <rawtaz> SpamapS: doing your third suggestion is what i ended up with, found a post on SO as well. having some trouble with it not binding correctly but that shouldnt be due to upstart :)
[13:46] <rawtaz> so i think it's okay. i guess this means upstart doesnt track the pid and have no control over the process, but thats fine i think, its not that important
[13:46] <rawtaz> thanks a lot for your help guys :)
[13:57] <SpamapS> rawtaz: np, and agreed, that is silly and they should fix it
[13:57] <SpamapS> rawtaz: or, if you feel like you might know enough C, you could of course fix it yourself :)
[13:58] <rawtaz> i could, if i did :D