[00:44] <topyli> Unit193: bzshells doesn't have a written policy compatible with ours. or didn't have at the time, and they haven't notified us of any improvements
[00:58] <topyli> here is the log from the relevant meeting: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/08/14/%23ubuntu-meeting.html#t21:47
[01:05] <topyli> the discussion on mailing list: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-irc/2010-August/thread.html
[01:06] <topyli> a shellium admin later joined -ops and informed us about their improved policy
[01:47] <Unit193> topyli: Ah, thank you muchly.
[01:48] <topyli> np, thanks for being interested :)
[01:50] <Unit193> Should that be added to the ns-bans file, and should I add it to the banlist?
[01:51] <topyli> i'm not sure how blanket bans are supposed to be handle technically
[01:51] <topyli> handled even
[01:53] <topyli> i never think about practical stuff, it's not my deparment :)
[01:57] <IdleOne> Unit193: if you're not seeing abuse from that shell providers users, to me it is a non-issue.
[01:59] <Unit193> IdleOne: That's one thing I was wondering.
[02:00] <IdleOne> common sense before everything :)
[02:08] <Unit193> Eh, seemed to favor paperwork in the past.
[23:07] <hggdh> jpds: could you please take ubot2` out of #ubuntu-br? We are now running a bot that is slowly being translated (ubotu-br)
[23:22] <Unit193> hggdh: You could, in theory, use "/remove ubot2` Thanks for your help, but you've been replaced."
[23:31] <hggdh> Unit193: yes, I could, but I thought it would be nicier to tell jpds about it :-)