[02:29] <bigjools> roaksoax: around?
[02:59] <roaksoax> bigjools: pong
[03:00] <bigjools> roaksoax: hi
[03:00] <bigjools> roaksoax: any opinions on this? http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~julian-edwards/maas/packaging/revision/177
[03:43] <roaksoax> bigjools: give me a sec :)
[04:17] <roaksoax> bigjools: looks good to me.I would probably use the codename though.
[04:17] <roaksoax> bigjools: but i dunno if we can do that in upstart jobs (policy)
[04:17] <roaksoax> will check with someone tomorrow
[04:32] <bigjools> roaksoax: there's no codename in os-release
[04:34] <bigjools> roaksoax: also maas-dhcp needs a dependency on the cluster controller I reckon
[05:13] <lifeless> bigjools: lsb_release -cs ?
[05:13] <bigjools> why use that when a shell script can just source /etc/os-release
[05:16] <bigjools> and, why the hell do people write desktop daemons in python
[05:28] <lifeless> lsb-release is more portable, no ?
[05:42] <bigjools> not sure it matters in an Ubuntu packaging branch
[06:00] <lifeless> ah, fair enough
[06:00] <lifeless> anyhow, you wanted the codename, which isn't in os-release :)
[06:04] <bigjools> *I* didn't want it :)