=== meetingology` is now known as meetingology === izdubar is now known as MarkDude === Odenthaa is now known as Odysimus === meetingology` is now known as meetingology === Odenthaa is now known as Odysimus === izdubar is now known as MarkDude === meetingology` is now known as meetingology === blkperl_ is now known as blkperl === meetingology` is now known as meetingology === adam_g_ is now known as adam_g === shirgall is now known as Guest10813 [22:44] bkerensa: If you have not seen it yet, there is a response regarding the "Community" link on the ubuntu.com website here: http://design.canonical.com/2013/05/ubuntu-com-update/ [22:50] That helps a bit [23:05] Hi Guest10813 I just saw this on the way back to my office [23:06] bkerensa: I'm actually shirgall, I got fubar'ed by the last netsplt [23:06] Ah [23:06] was wondering [23:07] Guest10813: So the problem that led to the blog post was in fact someone from QA said they were not going to re-add it to the top [23:07] there was some flip flop occuring [23:07] bkerensa: yeah [23:07] mind you they could have done this all seamlessly and just changed the hyperlink [23:07] they have not provided a valid justification as to why that did not occur [23:08] Jono tried to say the site was not "hacky" [23:08] bkerensa: I understand the frustration [23:08] I call BS :) I do web dev [23:08] Guest10813: either way its good to see its coming back [23:08] the big concern for me is there was a immediate dive of 33% traffic loss [23:09] and any new contributors help keep things moving forward [23:09] bkerensa: well, I'm glad there was a response, although it was not as timely as I had hoped [23:10] Well, bs for sure , but, that post *matches my second* solution on my BP [23:10] Keep link in footer, and promote Community with shiny part [23:11] Even those screenshots have a *community style story* to follow as link [23:11] Im sure the metric will be tweaked to be *slightly higher than 1/3 [23:11] or more [23:12] * MarkDude considers his BP closed, and will follow directions/advice on bkerensa 's BP [23:13] * Guest10813 isn't calling it solved, was just pointing out that there's new information [23:16] Well yes [23:16] I had minimals in my BP, on purpose [23:16] Just in case of funny stuff [23:17] Deeper issue here, trust me- I was just interviewed about all of this- it will be published tomoroow early [23:17] * MarkDude is still willing to do my thing. Jono and MArk know I am gonna grandstand a bit [23:18] Nicely [23:18] * MarkDude can do his own thing as far as ideas, or even better be a Team player, and follow directions and orders [23:19] * MarkDude wants to be a Team player, and only help where needed or asked [23:19] MarkDude: Someone from Linux Pro Magazine e-mailed me.... Did you send him my way? [23:20] Nope [23:20] I guess he writes for Linux Pro, LJ and Datamation [23:20] He already knew a bit about you [23:20] I sent him to only one person [23:21] He knew some background stuff. He is fair writer. Journalist [23:21] fair meaning fair to people- not quality :D [23:21] He's not doing a hitpiece [23:22] I dont think he will break any NDAs, he has a good rep [23:22] His line of questioning was fair, and he was not looking for dirty laundry [23:22] He *did* ask about videos [23:23] He was surprised at the timeline- as far as how many Community efforts were made [23:24] * MarkDude explained the delay in time on reaction to removal of link as disbelief [23:24] :) [23:24] Should make for a good read === shirgall_ is now known as shirgall