[06:10] <crass> is there currently a way to use the build farm to make arm builds?
[06:11] <czajkowski> crass: yes see the topic
[06:12] <crass> so it can't be done with the recipe feature? I'd like to have daily snapshot builds
[06:13] <czajkowski> crass: 10 builds a week only.
[06:13] <wgrant> It works fine with recipes, but you still have to operate within the build limits.
[06:14] <crass> what if I make a recipe run on repo commits and there are more than 10 commits a week?
[06:15] <crass> will the 11th just be silently ignored? or do I get penalized/
[06:16] <wgrant> PPAs which regularly violate the limits will have their ARM builds revoked.
[06:18] <crass> ok, good to know
[09:19] <crass> I'm using dh_auto_configure to build my package, but its not building anything
[09:19] <crass> it works locally, thisis the buildlog: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/139916930/buildlog_ubuntu-raring-i386.megatools_1.9.92~crass~precise1%2Bgit20130515%2Br54-0~r5~pread~crass~raring1_UPLOADING.txt.gz
[09:19] <crass> anyideas? I'm starting to run out
[09:20] <wgrant> crass: How have you tested it locally?
[09:20] <wgrant> You need to test in a clean environment, usually pbuilder or sbuild.
[09:21] <crass> right, its not been in a clean env... :/
[09:37] <mpt> Is there any way to get a list of bug reports that someone has changed recently? +commentedbugs doesn't show status changes, for example
[09:37] <mpt> (and neither does ~person/+bugs)
[09:38] <wgrant> mpt: No
[09:38] <czajkowski> mpt: not that I know of I know when I find a spammer I go to their LP page and open up all the bugs they've been on and review them or review a chunk of them
[09:38] <mpt> czajkowski, that's what I mean, there doesn't seem to be a list of "all the bugs they've been on"
[09:38] <wgrant> You can't tell all bugs that were touched
[09:38] <wgrant> Just commented
[09:39] <mpt> ok
[09:40] <mpt> A non-subscriber just marked a bug I was subscribed to as fixed with no explanation, and I was wondering if they'd done that to any bug reports I'm not subscribed to. :-)
[09:43] <mpt> (Now wishing we'd implemented that timeline feature of "Here's what this person did recently across Launchpad")
[09:43] <czajkowski> mpt: ah so you're going to code that feature then :)
[09:43] <czajkowski> great :)
[09:44] <mpt> czajkowski, yeah, I'll do it on Friday afternoon
[09:44] <czajkowski> mpt: excellent I'll bring you cake then!
[10:44] <mpt> czajkowski, anyway: Ernest gomboš <https://launchpad.net/~ernestgombos> marked bug 273049, bug 309829, and bug 549217 all as fixed for apparently no reason. I've switched them back. I don't know what your threshold is for warning/disabling users.
[10:44] <ubot5`> bug 273049 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "update-manager should guest an estimative of upgrade size to prevent running out of free disk" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/273049
[10:44] <ubot5`> bug 309829 in Ubuntu "MMC.EXE-DCD22666.pf" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/309829
[10:44] <ubot5`> bug 549217 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "security updates not installed daily as configured" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/549217
[10:45] <mpt> Those are the only bug reports he's touched this month.
[10:46] <czajkowski> I've a low threshhold
[10:46] <czajkowski> :)
[10:47] <mpt> And he's been a Launchpad member only since last month.
[10:47] <czajkowski> fixed :)
[10:47] <czajkowski> thank you
[11:00] <crass> I've never been able to tell from the build log what a missing dependency has been: eg. https://launchpadlibrarian.net/139922347/buildlog.txt.gz
[11:00] <crass> does it even say there?
[11:29] <geser> crass: "Depends: libwxgtk2.9-dev which is a virtual package." Are you sure about that package name as even the current Ubuntu development version has only libwxgtk2.8-dev
[11:32] <crass> geser: thanks for looking, its in the ppa: https://launchpad.net/~crass/+archive/dng4ps2
[11:37] <crass> geser: but I think you're right in that libwxgtk2.9-dev is the problem
[11:40] <geser> crass: you got a race condition: wxwidget2.9 for raring got published in your PPA 3 minutes after the recipe tried building
[11:43] <crass> wow, good catch, let me try again
[11:58] <crass> saucy hasnot libwx packages?
[11:59] <geser> sure it has but only 2.8 currently
[12:01] <crass> yeah, that's expected. I was asking because http://packages.ubuntu.com find nothingwhen searching for libwx in saucy. but it looks like they haven't updated for saucy (but you can search in it??) because it shows no packages for saucy
[12:49] <dpm> czajkowski, wgrant, StevenK, could any of you remove the "Dr. Geo" project from the https://launchpad.net/ubuntu-translations-project project group?
[12:50] <czajkowski> hmmm
[12:50] <czajkowski> let me havea look
[12:50] <czajkowski> never removed one from a project group before
[12:50] <czajkowski> dpm: should it not be there?
[12:51] <StevenK> czajkowski: +edit and drop the Part of
[12:51] <StevenK> It will still exist, but be dropped from the group
[12:51] <dpm> czajkowski, exactly. It's not related to the project in any way. I assume the project maintainer added it as "part of" by mistake
[12:52] <czajkowski> StevenK: I dont haev permission on https://launchpad.net/ubuntu-translations-project/+edit
[12:52] <StevenK> czajkowski: Webops it up, then
[12:52] <czajkowski> StevenK: wilko cheers
[12:52] <StevenK> Or dpm can :-)
[12:53]  * dpm has a look
[12:54] <StevenK> dpm: No, as in you could ask webops, but czajkowski has beaten you.
[12:54] <dpm> StevenK, czajkowski, there are no settings related to child projects in https://launchpad.net/ubuntu-translations-project/+edit - I think that is a setting in the child project instead?
[12:54] <dpm> StevenK, ah, gotcha ;)
[14:14] <hachre> hi guys, is there a dedicated soyuz channel?
[14:14] <hachre> im having a question about a PPA weirdness that I'm experiencing
[14:14] <hachre> I have deleted packages and the used space went down after about 10 minutes as expected, however it still shows 500 MB used for 0 binary packages
[14:15] <hachre> is there some way I can manually clean that up?
[20:02] <dobey> is there any way to pin recipes to the ubuntu devel branch (lp:ubuntu/foo)? i have some recipes which were using that, but once the alias was moved over to saucy, they all are set to lp:ubuntu/raring/foo now, and i want them to always use the development alias