[11:18] <hulu> who can help me with https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/casper/+bug/1179367
[11:18] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1179367 in casper (Ubuntu) "Customizing the live user skel" [Undecided,New]
[15:26] <rbasak> https://bugs.launchpad.net/~csredrat/+bugs?orderby=-date_last_updated&start=0
[15:26] <rbasak> Do folks consider this useful, or is this just creating extra triaging work?
[15:28] <TheLordOfTime> rbasak, we already talked about this yesterday
[15:28] <TheLordOfTime> bdmurray, ping
[15:29] <TheLordOfTime> rbasak, bdmurray sent them an email (he has access to see through the "private email" thing?)
[15:29] <TheLordOfTime> and i sent them an email a few days earlier via LP
[15:29] <TheLordOfTime> but so far nothing is going on.
[15:29] <TheLordOfTime> almost as if they're ignoring us or not receiving the emailsd
[15:29] <TheLordOfTime> emails*
[15:29] <TheLordOfTime> balloons, sorta ping ^
[15:29] <bdmurray> TheLordOfTime: why did rbasak send an email?  I'd said I'd do it and did
[15:30] <TheLordOfTime> bdmurray, I sent the email earlier
[15:30]  * balloons is UDS'sing
[15:30] <rbasak> I didn't do anything. I just asked here, only just now, in case someone else had a different opinion or was already taking care of it.
[15:30] <TheLordOfTime> bdmurray, rbasak is asking about what's going on
[15:30] <bdmurray> rbasak: oh, sorry I read that as rbasak and bdmurray sent them an email
[15:31] <bdmurray> I'm pondering next steps
[15:32] <rbasak> You could write a friendly explanation that these bugs aren't useful to us and create extra work, that emailing him didn't work, suggest that he contact us on the ML, and then bulk comment with that response and bulk mark his bugs as Invalid.
[15:34] <bdmurray> rbasak: do you know of a good wiki link regarding ubuntu development and sync'ing packages with debian?
[15:34] <TheLordOfTime> the question is are they RECEIVING the emails
[15:35] <TheLordOfTime> balloons brought up the point yesterday in priv it may be an unused or no-longer-working or no-longer-accessed email
[15:35] <bdmurray> fwiw its a large well known email service
[15:36] <TheLordOfTime> (hence my saying "no longer accessed")
[15:36] <TheLordOfTime> bdmurray, i take it there was no response?
[15:36] <bdmurray> additionally, I emailed them directly to avoid any misfiltering of Launchpad emails
[15:36] <TheLordOfTime> (so far)
[15:36]  * rbasak looks for something relevant
[15:40] <rbasak> bdmurray: the best I can find is the top of https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/Merging. I can't find a good explanation of the sync/merge process.
[15:45] <bdmurray> rbasak: thanks, I'll have a look and see if that might help them out
[15:53] <rbasak> bdmurray: I'm sure he doesn't really *need* all of those packages updated, so I think he's just trying to be helpful. I think explaining that we sync and merge automatically/from reports, don't specifically need a bug for every package that is out of date will help, and only want bugs for packages that are behind and of particular interest, and that filing all these extra bugs just creates extra triaging work for us may help.
[15:55] <bdmurray> rbasak: right those are the points I tried to cover in my email
[15:55] <bdmurray> and that those bugs likely won't be changelog closed so will just take up space
[15:58] <rbasak> Sounds like you're on top of it :)
[15:58] <TheLordOfTime> mhm
[16:00] <rbasak> The two of his that hit the server triage queue today were for bind 10 (filed in the bind9 source package with no bind10 package or bug in Debian) and samba 4 (filed in the samba package with a samba4 source package that already exists).
[16:12] <paco11> hola masters!
[16:13] <paco11> i have a problem with openldap 2.4.28 on ubuntu 12.04 > => bdb_idl_delete_key: c_del id failed: DB_LOCK_DEADLOCK: Locker killed to resolve a deadlock (-30994) | conn=-1 op=0: attribute "entryCSN" index delete failure
[16:13] <paco11> if anyone can help me
[16:13] <paco11> thanks!
[17:42] <hggdh> paco11: is there a bug for this?
[17:43] <paco11> how? a bug report?
[17:43] <hggdh> paco11: yes. Without bug reports, there is not much that can be done
[17:44] <paco11> for the moment no. I would like to see if here someone knows this problem
[18:12] <amontero> hi all
[18:12] <amontero> in LP bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mumble/+bug/934239
[18:12] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 934239 in mumble (Ubuntu) "Mumble install does not register mumble:// URL handler with the system/firefox" [Undecided,Fix released]
[18:12] <amontero> I've updated descr to match SRU info. Anyone can help me in my first SRU (into Precise)?
[18:14] <bdmurray> somebody would need to part the patch from R to P
[18:15] <amontero> I've already submitted a merge proposal in https://code.launchpad.net/~pataquets/ubuntu/precise/mumble/mumble-bug-934239/+merge/161105
[18:17] <amontero> Looks like someone has to 'retarget' (?) the bug?
[18:17] <amontero> (from step 4 at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Procedure)
[18:19] <bdmurray> ah, okay I'd skipped over the merge proposals sorry
[18:20] <amontero> np
[18:20] <bdmurray> amontero: an update to debian/changelog would be good
[18:21] <amontero> I kind of remember the format, just a copy/paste of commit msg line, right?
[18:22] <bdmurray> amontero: dch -i in the branch should launch an editor with the changelog file
[18:22] <bdmurray> and then just copying the entry from raring should be fine
[18:22] <bdmurray> the main thing to watch out for is the version number
[18:22] <bdmurray> but that is documented in SRU wiki page you referenced
[18:26] <amontero> ops. that's in step 5 :) but pinging on IRC is needed before doing this to 'retarget'? I mean... what prevents now the SRU from moving 'as it is now'? The changelog line missing? Any other thing?
[18:28] <bdmurray> amontero: I'm double checking but it looks good to me
[18:28] <bdmurray> I did add a precise task for the bug report
[18:30] <amontero> let me check... could I've done it myself?
[18:31] <bdmurray> no
[18:32] <bdmurray> the new version of mumble should be 1.2.3-2ubuntu4.1
[18:32] <amontero> and this is why the bug went unnoticed for Precise, right? :(
[18:32] <amontero> I've also found that the merge proposal should have been into precise-proposed, right?
[18:33] <bdmurray> yes probably if there is a p-p branch
[18:34] <amontero> okay
[18:34] <amontero> ok, should I add my email in the changelog or it's meant for the maintainer/packager?
[18:34] <bdmurray> you've put together the fix so your email
[18:34] <bdmurray> and name
[18:35] <amontero> is this the same for current dev branch? Until now I only submitted the relevant patch and merge-proposed. Had been accepted, but better submit the changelog addition always from the begginning?
[18:37] <bdmurray> yes, it makes less work for the people merging the change
[18:37] <amontero> note taken :)
[18:38] <amontero> so, when it's done, just MP into precise-proposed and just wait, right? (I mean, no need to ping anyone here anymore)
[18:39] <bdmurray> there is no precise-proposed so just push to your existing branch and the mp will get refreshed
[18:39] <bdmurray> and you could ping me and I'll see about uploading it between uds work
[18:46] <amontero> thanks. but just pushing would eventually get some eyeballs to review it, right?
[18:46] <amontero> BTW. I'm at it now :)
[18:54] <bdmurray> eventually ues
[18:54] <bdmurray> er eventually yes, but I've already looked at it so might as well upload it
[18:55] <bdmurray> that seems most efficient to me
[19:01] <amontero> changelog and version bump is on the way :)
[19:02] <amontero> thanks for your help and patience. I'll ping u in a min to let u know when it's ready.
[19:19] <amontero> @bdmurray: ready for review:
[19:19] <meetingology> amontero: Error: "bdmurray:" is not a valid command.
[19:19] <amontero> https://code.launchpad.net/~pataquets/ubuntu/precise/mumble/mumble-bug-934239/+merge/161105
[19:26] <bdmurray> amontero: I'll have a look at it shortly
[19:27] <amontero> will be around, TIA. Meanwhile, I'll hunt for an old SRU candidate I did before this...
[19:47] <balloons> bdmurray, are there/were there any sessions on errors.u.c @ vUDS?
[19:49] <bdmurray> balloons: not that I know of
[19:50] <balloons> bdmurray, kk thanks. We'll probably be chatting about it at some point
[19:51] <balloons> we as in me with you and evan et la :-)
[19:51] <bdmurray> et la?
[19:51] <balloons> I'm curious about using it for quality metrics, which is not the intended use of the tool persay, but I think it could have some potential
[19:52] <balloons> http://www.thefreedictionary.com/et+al.
[19:53] <bdmurray> yes but you said et la
[19:54] <bdmurray> amontero: uploaded it just needs to be approved by an SRU admin
[19:57] <amontero> thanks a lot
[19:57] <amontero> now I'm at another SRU for avidemux2_gtk:
[19:57] <amontero> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+source/avidemux
[19:57] <amontero> next version bump would be 1:2.5.4-0ubuntu11.1 ?
[20:02] <amontero> (will post LP bug in a minute when I have it ready for review)
[20:15] <bdmurray> amontero: yes as that is > 0buntu11 and < 0ubuntu13 in quantal - dpkg --compare-versions might of some help
[20:22] <amontero> OK, thanks for the tip!
[20:22] <amontero> I've run:
[20:22] <amontero> $ dpkg --compare-versions 1:2.5.4-0ubuntu11.1 gt 1:2.5.4-0ubuntu11
[20:22] <amontero> $ dpkg --compare-versions 1:2.5.4-0ubuntu11.1 gt-nl 1:2.5.4-0ubuntu11
[20:22] <amontero> and both return 0, note taken :)
[20:22] <amontero> So, going for 2.5.4-0ubuntu11.1
[20:22] <amontero> (using 0ubuntu12 would conflict with quantal/later versions, right?)
[20:28] <amontero> bdmurray: MP for LP bug #1041144 is ready at https://code.launchpad.net/~pataquets/ubuntu/precise/avidemux/avidemux-bug-1041144/+merge/121341 and switched from WIP to 'needs review'
[20:28] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1041144 in avidemux (Ubuntu Precise) "avidemux2_gtk not displayed in the file properties 'Open with' tab" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1041144
[20:29] <amontero> hope it's everything OK.
[20:29] <amontero> gotta go supper now :) thank you very much for your help and patience.
[20:29] <amontero> it just needs to be targetted against precise, right?
[21:43] <paco11> hggdh: i just reported my problem on the mailing list "Locker killed to resolve a deadlock"
[22:03] <psusi> wow... I don't even know where to begin to file a bug on this, anyone got any idea?  13.04 desktop running under qemu-kvm is just totally fscked... I try to open a terminal and the prompt is in weird multi colors, and the background is weird goofy transparent, and when I exit and try to open it again, the unit launcher just sits there ignoring my clicks and not launching a new terminal
[22:09] <RoyK> seen something about the same after an upgrade
[22:09] <RoyK> :P
[22:10] <RoyK> not my main desktop, though
[22:20] <Cas> this new activity for an old bug looks a bit suspicious: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers/+bug/655832
[22:20] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 655832 in nvidia-graphics-drivers (Ubuntu) "X server 1.9.0 crashes reproducibly when a lot of gnome-terminal windows are opened on GeForce 8800 GTS/nvidia drivers/compiz with `normal' visual effects" [Medium,Fix released]
[22:25] <hggdh> psusi: I heard something about changing display setup on kvm
[22:26] <hggdh> paco11: sending to a mailing list may (probably will) not help much. We need a bug reported
[22:33] <paco11> hggdh: on Bug Squad?
[22:33] <paco11> Subscribe to the Bug Squad Mailing List?
[22:39] <bdmurray> psusi: change the video driver for the virtual machine
[22:41] <bdmurray> at least I think that'll help
[22:42] <bdmurray> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol/ubuntu-qa-tools/master/view/head:/vm-tools/vm-new#L212
[23:02] <psusi> bdmurray, what do you mean?
[23:07] <RoyK> hggdh: not very easy to change video driver when the gui doesn't show up :P
[23:14] <hggdh> RoyK: you should change in in the call to kvm...
[23:14] <bdmurray> psusi: sorry that branch wasn't helpful using vmvga works for me and raring
[23:19] <psusi> bdmurray, not sure what that branch is or what wmvga is... looking at the qemu docs, I tried -vga std instead of cirrus and it gets me higher resolution that is very slow, and still just ignores me when I click on the launcher icons... is there a bug to track this?
[23:21] <bdmurray> psusi: this is what I used --video=vmvga and I'm not sure about a bug tracking it
[23:21] <psusi> bdmurray, qemu doesn't seem to have such an option
[23:23] <bdmurray> ah, I'm using libvirt and kvm
[23:32] <psusi> isn't there a way to force it back to 2d mode?