=== Logan__ is now known as Logan_
=== Nigel_ is now known as G
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha
[06:08] <Forage> Which package should I file a bug against if I'm experiencing issues with UOA. No options input fields are shown when adding/altering a non-GOA account like jabber or irc
=== ivoks_ is now known as ivoks
=== greyback is now known as greyback|lunch
[12:29] <Forage> Which package should I file a bug against if I'm experiencing issues with UOA. No options input fields are shown when adding/altering a non-GOA account like jabber or irc
[12:29] <ogra_> UOA ?
[12:30] <DanChapman> Ubuntu online accounts?
[12:32] <Forage> DanChapman: yes
[12:32] <Forage> ogra_: ^
[12:33] <ogra_> signon UI i guess
[12:33] <ogra_> (the package)
[12:33] <ogra_> that should at least reach the right team for further triaging
[12:33] <Forage> ah, ok, cool
[12:34] <DanChapman> gnome-online-accounts https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-online-accounts
[12:53] <Forage> DanChapman: GOA functions properly
[12:54] <Forage> I just filed the bug against signon-ui: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/signon-ui/+bug/1180785
[12:54] <ubot2> Ubuntu bug 1180785 in signon-ui (Ubuntu) "Empty account details/options, no input fields displayed" [Undecided,New]
[13:01] <DanChapman> Forage: Sorry didnt see you had put non-GOA.
=== greyback|lunch is now known as greyback
[13:15] <hulu> helo
[13:15] <hulu> I'm customize the 13.04 livecd,but the livecd create default live user without /etc/skel
[13:16] <hulu> why?
=== mitya57 is now known as mitya57_
=== mitya57__ is now known as mitya57
=== rbasak-test is now known as rbasak
=== mitya57 is now known as mitya57_
=== mitya57_ is now known as mitya57
=== chrisccoulson is now known as firefox-is-aweso
=== firefox-is-aweso is now known as chrisccoulson
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
=== Jordan_U_ is now known as Jordan_U
[23:12] <raks437> Hello all
[23:13] <raks437> how can I track things I have done already..
[23:13] <hggdh> raks437: not sure I understand what you are asking. Track what?
[23:15] <raks437> Bug #1028764
[23:15] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1156346 in linux (Ubuntu) "duplicate for #1028764 Atheros AR9285 Wireless on Ubuntu 12.10 is slow, unstable and has a weak signal." [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1156346
[23:16] <raks437> yes this is what i did...please tell me its correct and I m headed in the right direction..
[23:17] <raks437> i marked this bug as duplicate..
[23:17] <raks437> :)
[23:17] <raks437> I am happy to do something..but is that cool..
[23:17] <raks437> feedback please..
[23:24] <hggdh> raks437: I think you did all that was asked. You could try new upstream kernels (since you tested, 3.9 was officially released, and we probably now have a 3.10 upstream kernel as well)
[23:35] <raks437> Bug #1030568
[23:35] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1030568 in gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu) "Fn+F3 in dell studio 1555 doesn't disable charging" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1030568
[23:36] <raks437> I am new to this...my 2nd..did I do it correctly..
[23:40] <hggdh> raks437: ideally you should use ubuntu-bug to open a bug -- it will add a bit more of needed data (like Ubuntu version, and data on the package, which are missing here). Manually opening a bug should be the very last instance, and only when you *know* what to add
[23:41] <raks437> hggdh: what you said seems jargon to me..I am trying to catch up...need a little push..
[23:42] <raks437> and I am trying to learn Triaging,,,fyi..
[23:42] <raks437> I did not opened this Bug..
[23:43] <hggdh> raks437: heh, my fault :-)
[23:43] <hggdh> raks437: not bad, but we do not know what version of Ubuntu the reporter is using (and not even if gnome-settings-manager is in use)
[23:44] <raks437> yes...thats y I marked as Incomplete and hope the OP will give some more info
[23:46] <hggdh> raks437: but you still should specifically ask for the OP
[23:46] <hggdh> ´s UBuntu version and gnome-settings-daemon's version
[23:47] <raks437> can I edit my comments then ?
[23:51] <hggdh> raks437: no, you cannot edit a comment. But you can add a new one :-)
[23:51] <raks437> I am sorry but how to you check the version on gnome-settings-daemon (I am not an expert yet)
[23:52] <raks437> I guess the OP is also a beginner and would not know this
[23:52] <raks437> nothing in the man-page
[23:53] <hggdh> raks437: one way: dpkg -l gnome-settings-daemon
[23:55] <raks437> hggdh: pleasure working with you noble man