[05:27] <crass> wgrant: damn, so its impossible to switch from "rebuild sources" to "copy binaries" when copying from one ppa to another?
[05:35] <wgrant> crass: Right
[05:44] <crass> thanks for clarifying... would be nice to have a notice or help box on the copy packages page notifying the user about that
[05:46] <crass> also do you know anything about the code importer?  I'm wondering what happens when the history is changed for a git import.
[05:47] <crass> I'm guessing the revision of the last import would never change, since effectively it would be in a detached head state
[05:57] <wgrant> crass: It'll import whatever the remote history is.
[05:57] <wgrant> crass: If the head changes to something completely different, it'll import whatever history is implied by that head
[05:58] <crass> oh, sweet, that's exactly what I'd like
[06:07] <crass> is there a way to "copy binaries" and change the version?
[06:09] <wgrant> No
[06:09] <wgrant> You have to upload a new source
=== BradCrittenden is now known as bac
[11:04] <cristian_c> Hi
[11:04] <cristian_c> i'd like to change the subrscrition option for a bug report
[11:04] <cristian_c> but I can't
[11:06] <cristian_c> ok, it's incredibly changed
[11:06] <cristian_c> :O
[11:07] <cristian_c> XD
[11:09] <cristian_c> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/48267
[11:09] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 48267 in linux (Ubuntu) "No driver loaded for Realtek 8129 NIC, visible in lspci" [Medium,Confirmed]
[11:10] <cristian_c> the bug has been assigned to the user has re-opened it
[11:10] <cristian_c> How is it possible?
[11:10] <cristian_c> :O
[11:17] <tsimpson> they assigned the bug to themselves and changed the status from Invalid to Confirmed
[11:23] <cristian_c> tsimpson, ok, but the user is not a developer
[11:24] <tsimpson> cristian_c: so?
[11:24] <cristian_c> tsimpson, the bug should be assigned to a developer
[11:24] <cristian_c> :)
[11:25] <tsimpson> anyone can assign the bug to someone, and anyone can change the status
[11:26] <cristian_c> tsimpson, I know this user. I'e suggested him to re-open the report
[11:26] <cristian_c> *I've
[11:26] <cristian_c> but he doesn't know linux
[11:26] <tsimpson> then unassign them from the bug I suppose
[11:27] <cristian_c> How can I/he do?
[11:27] <cristian_c> *do/does
[11:28] <tsimpson> on the bug page, click the pencil icon next to their name under "Assigned to", and choose "Remove assignee"
[11:29] <cristian_c> tsimpson, removed, thanks
[11:29] <cristian_c> :)
[11:30] <tsimpson> no problem :)
[11:30] <cristian_c> :)
[12:25] <PrototypeX29A> hi
[12:25] <PrototypeX29A> it looks like some of the bugs i reported in launchpad are gone (not fixed, but the reports are gone)
[12:25] <PrototypeX29A> are bugs reports deleted at some point?
[12:26] <wgrant> No, they are never deleted.
[12:26] <wgrant> Do you have an example?
[12:26] <PrototypeX29A> i am looking for a series of bugs i reported or commented on related to my display going blank
[12:26] <PrototypeX29A> i can't find any of those
[12:26] <wgrant> What's your Launchpad username?
[12:27] <PrototypeX29A> the same as here
[12:28] <PrototypeX29A> "All related bugs" lists 10 bugs, but i should have reported and commented on way more
[12:28] <wgrant> That lists only open bugs by default
[12:28] <PrototypeX29A> i get it
[12:28] <wgrant> The advanced search link will let you search for all statuses, as well as duplicate bugs.
[12:29] <PrototypeX29A> thansk
[12:30] <PrototypeX29A> expired?
[12:30] <wgrant> Ubuntu closes bugs when information is requested from the reporter and the bug goes unanswered for 60 days.
[12:32] <PrototypeX29A> i never get what they want, it seemed to me they were working on it
[12:33] <PrototypeX29A> can i reopen the bug?
[12:33] <PrototypeX29A> like that one? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/740893
[12:33] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 740893 in linux (Ubuntu) "Kernel 2.6.38-7 completely dims screen on Intel GMA 4500M" [Medium,Expired]
[12:33] <wgrant> You should be able to switch the status from Expired to New
[12:36] <PrototypeX29A> i cant find where
[12:36] <wgrant> There's an edit icon next to Expired in the affects table.
[12:36] <PrototypeX29A> i am not the original reporter, though
[12:36] <PrototypeX29A> found it, thanks
[16:13] <tgm4883> I thought I remembered hearing that non-canonical PPA's could now build armhf packages, but I can't find any info on that. Am I crazy?