[08:17] <glavkos> hi
[08:19] <glavkos> I tried to upload a *.po file
[08:19] <glavkos> for a translation
[08:19] <glavkos> and I get a message for Referer header
[08:19] <glavkos> ?
[08:21] <glavkos> ok
[08:21] <glavkos> I will try to set that
[08:21] <glavkos> bye
[09:10] <balboah> I seem to be getting 404's when trying to update packages? Err http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main Sources: 404 Not Found
[09:11] <SpamapS> OOPS-dbe02577acd38a4c622511ef398966b6
[09:11] <SpamapS> I've had the same update fail 6 times in a row now with a timeout
[09:11] <SpamapS> just trying to update 1 bug status
[09:11] <SpamapS> halp?
[09:20] <mgz> SpamapS: maybe bug 1076512
[09:21] <mgz> what bug were you have issues with updating?
[09:22] <mgz> ah, yeah, almost certainly that issue
[09:22] <mgz> bug 1179008
[09:22] <mgz> has some impressive project links
[09:28] <SpamapS> Yeah
[09:28] <SpamapS> that really shouldn't do whatever weird join it is doing
[09:29] <SpamapS> I don't care one lick about the status in python-heatclient .. I want to update the status for tripleo :-P
[09:31] <mgz> to what, just so I can try?
[09:31] <SpamapS> mgz: Fix Released
[09:32] <mgz> yeah, that's not going to get done within a five second timeout...
[09:34] <SpamapS> mgz: I don't know anything about LP's database, but shouldn't it should be updating a single column in a single row of a single table?
[09:34] <SpamapS> Or is the answer "because storm" ?
[09:36] <wgrant> It's nothing to do with Storm
[09:36] <wgrant> It's probably "because bug heat"
[09:36] <wgrant> Let's see
[09:36] <wgrant> Waiting for SSO..
[09:37] <mgz> seems subscription related to my untrained eye
[09:37] <wgrant> Oh, that one, yeah
[09:37] <wgrant> SpamapS: Notifications
[09:38] <mgz> 1s on two notification queries, 1s on subscription lookup
[09:38] <wgrant> SSO, are you alive...
[09:38] <wgrant> can't actually see the OOPS yet
[09:38] <mgz> yeah, was sloooow today for whatever reason
[09:38] <wgrant> But if it's the one I think it is then it's because OpenStack has hundreds of structural subscribers
[09:38] <SpamapS> ah, seems like notifications are one of those things ripe for async... :-P
[09:38] <wgrant> Yes, it's on my roadmap for the next 6 months
[09:38] <wgrant> But time.
[09:38] <SpamapS> wgrant: yeah that makes sense
[09:39] <wgrant> I know exactly how I'm going to do it, but there's a lot of other things that also need doing :(
[09:48] <SpamapS> wgrant: indeed, nice to see Critical count below 100 though. :)
[09:50] <wgrant> We're getting there :)
[16:02] <SpamapS> wgrant: FYI, I removed bug 1179008 from tripleo .. so it won't be a good test case for you later. ;)
[16:24] <shorty40hands>  please help im having trouble with the signing of the COC both in command line and in the COC app assistant freezes on page 4 if anyone can help me through this please shoot me a pm. ty
[17:23] <shorty40hands>  please help im having trouble with the signing of the COC both in command line and in the COC app assistant freezes on page 4 if anyone can help me through this please shoot me a pm. ty
[17:27] <dobey> shorty40hands: i think you need to ask in #ubuntu maybe. that doesn't seem like an issue or question about launchpad itself
[17:45] <shorty40hands> i was told by ubuntu admin to ask it here lol
[17:47] <shorty40hands> it seems no one can come to a conclusion on forums for this issue catch 22
[17:48] <shorty40hands> my keys are all approved and verified
[17:49] <shorty40hands> the fingerprints are copied
[18:02] <dobey> shorty40hands: state exactly what the problem is then. gpg won't sign the file? or what?
[18:21] <shorty40hands> the exact problem is my key is verified as well the fingerprint ive downloaded the coc file and i run the command line as directed now when it comes up inside the terminal  it brings up all the info except for the fact it acts like i already entered my passphrase  but i havent so it wont complete the action so i downloaded the coc app and i get to the 4th step even with the info in there it wont let me go to the next screen
[18:22] <shorty40hands> and ive tried a new key same result
[18:32] <shorty40hands> is there a way to force it to ask for the passphrase?
[18:38] <dobey> ok, that has nothing to do with launchpad. gpg --sign-detached file, will ask for the passphrase if you haven't entered it, and aren't using an agent
[18:39] <dobey> i don't know anyone in #ubuntu would have told you to come here to ask about that. but #ubuntu is the general help channel for ubuntu
[18:43] <shorty40hands> i asked there and they told me its a question for here i dont know i just know that coc wont give me the option to enter the passphrase  and as far as agent are you refrencing  what decrypts the email that shows me the message to copy and paste?
[18:44] <dobey> i'm referring to the gnome-keyring or gpg-agent, as you can have the keyring remember the passphrase and gpg will automatically use that, rather than prompting
[18:45] <arosales> I am looking at https://launchpad.net/+apidoc/beta.html#specification but I don't see a clear way to get blueprint dependency tree information from the API, is this exposed?
[18:45] <shorty40hands> ok so i need to make the keyring not remember so it will prompt
[18:46] <arosales> when dep trees get large they become unreadable so I was looking for an alternative method to get this information.
[18:46] <dobey> so if it's not prompting, you either are doing that, or have some other problem with gpg. but it's not a launchpad issue. i don't know what the "coc app" is that you keep referring to, either.
[18:47] <shorty40hands> coc signing assistant
[18:47] <shorty40hands> is the app
[18:47] <dobey> shorty40hands: yes, i don't know what it is
[18:47] <dobey> i have never heard of it or seen anything about it
[18:47] <shorty40hands> its in software manager and several forums point to it
[18:48] <dobey> shorty40hands: so for problems with it, you should probably ask whoever wrote it about your problem, or file a bug against it
[18:48] <shorty40hands> ok thanks for the help
[18:50] <dobey> arosales: i don't think there is any way to really manage blueprints via the api
[18:50] <arosales> dobey, ok. Any suggestion on getting at the dependency tree information in a different manner?
[18:52] <dobey> arosales: what does "dependency tree information" mean with regards to specs exactly?
[18:53] <dobey> blueprints don't have dependencies
[18:54] <arosales> dobey, sorry I am talking about building a dependency tree in launchpad blueprints via the "Add Dependency" link
[18:54] <arosales> dobey, for example the Dependency Tree in https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/topic-raring-servercloud-overview
[18:55] <arosales> is quite on readable and I can't zoom in on it since it is not a svg
[18:55] <dobey> arosales: i don't see an "Add dependency" link there
[18:55] <arosales> dobey, may be cause you don't have a access to edit Ubuntu BPs.
[18:56] <arosales> dobey, but if you look at a blueprint of a project that you are a driver for or maintainer you should see the link.
[18:56] <dobey> arosales: i don't see it on blueprints for projects i own either
[18:57] <arosales> dobey, are you the driver or maintainer for the project?
[18:57] <arosales> owning is not sufficient in this context, I think
[18:57] <dobey> yes
[18:57] <arosales> dobey, and you don't see "Add Dependency" link?
[18:58] <dobey> oh, i see it now. it's at the bottom and rather inconsequential
[18:59] <dobey> i don't think there is any other reasonable way to get that information though.
[18:59] <arosales> btw, https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/topic-raring-servercloud-overview should load for any viewer to see an example of an unwieldy dep tree
[18:59] <arosales> dobey, ah ok :-/
[18:59] <arosales> dobey, thanks for the reply
[19:00] <dobey> there's basically no api for blueprints; only thing you can do is link a branch, really
[19:06] <arosales> dobey, ok. Thanks for the information.
[22:16] <iBelieve> Is there any way to search for bugs that were either reported by or assigned to a certain user? I basically need a way to OR (not AND) field.assignee and field.bug_reporter. I'm trying to come up with a URL to show bugs involving a user (fixing bug #1086825)
[22:55] <dobey> iBelieve: you want a URL on launchpad? or you're using the API?
[22:56] <iBelieve> dobey, I'm going to open a web page, so I need to end up with a URL. But I am using the Python Launchpad API, so I could use that too.
[22:57] <dobey> iBelieve: https://bugs.launchpad.net/~/ shows all related bugs by default.
[22:58] <dobey> subscribed, reported, assigned, etc…
[22:58] <dobey> if you want ONLY the assigned/reported bugs, you'll have to do 2 searches with the API, and combine the set, i think
[23:02] <iBelieve> dobey, would having to do 2 searches also apply to bugs in a certain package also?
[23:03] <dobey> iBelieve: yes
[23:03] <dobey> the searchBugs() method is the same across the board i think. only difference is what you get if you don't pass any arguments to refine the search
[23:08] <dobey> anyway, i'm back to being away now