[09:33] <troulouliou_dev> hi i m trying to register on launchpad but i do not receive a confirmation email and when i m trying to log in it say "Your page was stale."
[09:36] <wgrant> troulouliou_dev: That usually means that your browser isn't sending a Referer header.
[09:37] <troulouliou_dev> wgrant, ha right it is disable here thanks !!
[09:38] <troulouliou_dev> wgrant, bugtrack is mixed for ubuntu / mint ?
[09:39] <wgrant> troulouliou_dev: No, Mint is a separate project with a separate bug tracker
[09:39] <wgrant> The Ubuntu bug tracker is not for Mint bugs
[09:40] <troulouliou_dev> wgrant, ok
[10:19] <Terry_Guo> Hi, I just successfully packaged my source and uploaded them into Launchpad. They did get successfully built and published. The .org.tar.bz2 file is also uploaded. Now I made some changes to my source, what command should I use to repackage the source? I used "dpkg-buildpackage -sa -S", and then "dput ppa:/xxxx  yyy_source.change". The problem is that the .org.tar.bz2 file will be uploaded...
[10:19] <Terry_Guo> ...again. It is quite annoying. What should I do to just upload the necessary files? Thanks.
[10:19] <StevenK> Terry_Guo: -sa is the problem
[10:19] <StevenK> -sa says to include always
[10:19] <wgrant> -sa means "include the orig tarball always"
[10:19] <wgrant> The only thing it does is exactly what you're asking it to not do :)
[10:20] <Terry_Guo> So I should just use "dpkg-buildpackage -S"??
[10:20] <wgrant> Yes
[10:21] <Terry_Guo> OK. Thank you.
[10:23] <Terry_Guo> I once misunderstood that "-sa" means sign my files. How silly I am. Thank you guys.
[10:24] <StevenK> Terry_Guo: It signs by default, there are two options to stop it doing so
[10:25] <Terry_Guo> Yes. I am reading the manual again.
[14:42] <ricotz> czajkowski, hi :)
[14:43] <czajkowski> ricotz: what's up
[14:43] <ricotz> yesterday an upload of a successful build timed-out and i am fearing it will happen again with that try https://launchpad.net/~ricotz/+archive/ppa/+build/4596196
[14:44] <ricotz> czajkowski, wgrant seems to be aware of such an internal time-out
[14:44] <czajkowski> yes I read the scroll back
[14:45] <ricotz> it seems to be like that now for over half an hours
[14:45] <ricotz> and i am hoping it won't fail again
[14:46] <ricotz> czajkowski, i just wanted to point you there maybe it can be debugged somehow
[14:47] <czajkowski> ricotz: nobody is around I'm afraid right now
[14:48] <ricotz> czajkowski, no worries, thank you
[15:03] <marcoceppi> So, I updated a daily recipe, requested another build and fo this error: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/140463202/upload_466117_log.txt I'm not sure what to do at this point.
[15:03] <marcoceppi> s/fo/got
[15:19] <czajkowski> cjwatson: have you ever seen an error like marcoceppi is getting before?
[15:19] <czajkowski> cjwatson: sprry for ping but StevenK and wgrant are not on
[15:20] <marcoceppi> czajkowski: I think I figured it out, I bumped the revision in the recipe link and it seem to have accepted that
[15:21] <czajkowski> ah ok if you'd had a ppa before and deleted it and need to reupload
[15:21] <czajkowski> you need to increase the version number
[15:22] <marcoceppi> czajkowski: right, which is what these recipe things do apparently. The version was slightly cryptic but made sense after a bit more poking
[15:25] <cjwatson> czajkowski: I have very little experience with recipes, sorry
[15:26] <czajkowski> cjwatson: np thanks
[15:27] <ricotz> czajkowski, marcoceppi, the source package itself is already present and one can't upload a new *different* tarball
[15:28] <ricotz> the recipe created a new tarball, but that exactly revision was already uploaded to the target ppa and maybe even already built
[15:40] <marcoceppi> ricotz czajkowski thanks for the help/clarification
[16:15] <rockstar> losa ping?
[16:23] <rockstar> Apparently mthaddon or mew are the guys I need.
[16:23] <wedgwood> rockstar: what's that you say?
[16:23] <wedgwood> (wedgwood=mew)
[16:23] <rockstar> wedgwood, hello sir
[16:24] <rockstar> I am looking to get the mailman pickle file of of the ~openstack mailing list so we can migrate away.
[16:26] <wedgwood> rockstar: Aha. I think I can do that for you.
[16:27] <rockstar> wedgwood, the -infra team got a pickle from flacoste when he was still engineering manager, so I assume that's *way* old. :)
[16:29] <wedgwood> rockstar: I don't expect that there's anything in that file that would be considered sensitive information, but as it is a convenient list of thousands of OpenStack users' email addresses, I'd feel a bit more comfortable handing it over to one of that team's administrators
[16:30] <rockstar> wedgwood, okay. Lemme get someone to make me an administrator. :)
[16:43] <rockstar> wedgwood, the due diligence is completed and I am an admin of that team.
[16:45] <wedgwood> rockstar: OK, just sorting out some sanitization of the file.
[16:45] <rockstar> wedgwood, okay, great.
[16:59] <sebbu> hi
[16:59] <sebbu> is/will launchpad be able to crosscompile & package for other distributions/systems ?
[17:41] <wedgwood> rockstar: ok, that's in the mail
[17:41] <rockstar> wedgwood, thank you kindly!
[17:43] <wedgwood> rockstar: or so I thought...
[19:11] <marcoceppi> So, I'm back to breaking things. Trying to request a build for a recipe and I'm getting "You have exceeded today&#x27;s quota for ubuntu saucy." Is there anyway to squeak by this just one time?
[19:23] <dobey> marcoceppi: request the build as a different user
[19:23] <marcoceppi> dobey: ah, thanks. I'll have someone else on the team do that for me
[19:24] <dobey> i don't know of any other way. and i've complained about the recipe build request quota a fair bit ;)
[19:40] <sebbu> what is the current limit ?
[19:40] <sebbu> i'll soon be trying to set up automated build for at least one of my project, so i may try quite a few
[19:48] <dobey> sebbu: it's like 5 per day or something small
[19:49] <dobey> sebbu: if you want to set up a recipe, you can use "bzr dailydeb recipe.txt" to build the source package locally, and pbuilder or sbuilder to test build it in a clean chroot
[19:54] <sebbu> I don't have the same distribution @home
[19:55] <sebbu> all i have is a debian7 & a win7 ^^
[19:58] <ScottK> sebbu: The Debian debbootstrap knows about Ubuntu.  You can do it fine on a Debian system.
[19:59] <dobey> yeah. and if you use a service like s3 or whatever, you can spin up an ubuntu or debian instance to do it on as well
[20:05] <sebbu> don't have any service like s3
[22:53] <semiosis> the build time estimates are ridiculous. right after upload, said it would start building in 6 hours. an hour later, it said 7 hours.  now 7 hours since upload, says 3 hours.
[22:53] <semiosis> why even bother to have an estimate